Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Danforth J H School in Wimberley, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84
Address
 200 TEXAN BLVD
Wimberley, TX 78676
Telephone
(512) 847-2181
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.wimberleyisd.net
City-data.com school rating
84
Students
532
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
36.7
Free lunch eligible students
115
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
16
School district
WIMBERLEY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MT VALLEY EL (9.9 miles):

86
Danforth J H School:

84
WIMBERLEY H S (0.2 miles):

79
MT VALLEY MIDDLE (11.1 miles):

79
JACOB'S WELL EL (0.6 miles):

71
KATHERINE ANNE PORTER SCHOOL (0.4 miles):

69
CANYON LAKE H S (7.3 miles):

61
TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL (10.4 miles):

18
PATHFINDER CAMP (10.7 miles):

4
Danforth J H School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Hays County:

53
Wimberley:

76
Danforth J H School:

84

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 532
Enrollment in 2015: 479
Enrollment in 2014: 507
Enrollment in 2013: 520
Enrollment in 2012: 472
Enrollment in 2011: 479
Enrollment in 2010: 481
Enrollment in 2009: 489
Enrollment in 2008: 470
Enrollment in 2007: 476
Enrollment in 2006: 503
Enrollment in 2005: 458
Enrollment in 2004: 446
Enrollment in 2003: 441
Enrollment in 2002: 429
Enrollment in 2001: 425
Enrollment in 2000: 412
Enrollment in 1999: 396

Danforth J H School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students206160166532
Female students1038791281
Male students1037375251
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - 12
Asian students3148
Hispanic students473536118
Black students12 - 3
White students153118121392
Two or More Races students1449

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 206
7th grade enrollment: 160
8th grade enrollment: 166

Danforth J H School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 281 (52.8%)
School:

52.8%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 251 (47.2%)
Here:

47.2%
State:

50.1%

Danforth J H School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 8 (1.5%)
Here:

1.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 118 (22.2%)
School:

22.2%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 3 (0.6%)
School:

0.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 392 (73.7%)
Here:

73.7%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (1.7%)
Here:

1.7%
State:

2.1%

Danforth J H School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 131 (24.6%)
School:

24.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 115 (21.6%)
Here:

21.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 16 (3.0%)
School:

3.0%
State:

6.2%

Danforth J H School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 36.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Danforth J H School:

14.5
Texas:

15.6

Danforth J H School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,932,654
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 35.2 (Salary Expenditures: $1,658,562)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $95,641)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $40,451)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $138,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $246,564
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,104,482
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,794,231
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $131,799)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $40,451)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $138,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $560,001

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic19
  • Asian2
  • White2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 23 (male: 13, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
  • White: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all female)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • White43
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 52 (male: 33, female: 19)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 43 (male: 26, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian2
  • White49
  • Multirace2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 63 (male: 31, female: 32)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 49 (male: 29, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Danforth J H School:

118.4
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 3,456 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,801
  • Males4,756
  • Females4,848
  • Hispanic4,765
  • White4,797
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,801
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 86
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 87

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.6 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.7 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.6 (93%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 84%

16%
84%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,756, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 77%)
23%
77%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,848, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,765, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,797, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,710
  • Males1,703
  • Females1,717
  • Hispanic1,677
  • White1,725
Math Average Scale Score:

1,710
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 197
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 197

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 34%

9%
27%
30%
34%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,703, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 32%)
9%
31%
28%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 35%)
9%
23%
33%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 25%)
13%
34%
29%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 143, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 37%)
7%
24%
32%
37%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,625
  • Males1,608
  • Females1,642
  • Hispanic1,596
  • White1,638
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,625
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 197
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 197

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

20%
28%
24%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 21%)
24%
27%
28%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 36%)
16%
28%
20%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
29%
27%
23%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 143, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 32%)
16%
27%
25%
32%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,697
  • Males1,715
  • Females1,680
  • Hispanic1,659
  • White1,712
  • Multirace1,714
Math Average Scale Score:

1,697
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 201
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 202

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

17%
33%
23%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 34%)
13%
35%
18%
34%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 103, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 20%)
20%
31%
29%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 27%)
32%
27%
14%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,712, Tested: 148, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 28%)
12%
35%
25%
28%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,714, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 17%)
33%
50%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,695
  • Males1,688
  • Females1,701
  • Hispanic1,649
  • White1,710
  • Multirace1,744
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,695
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 200
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 202

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

19%
22%
20%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 39%)
20%
23%
18%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 103, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 40%)
17%
20%
23%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,649, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 30%)
27%
28%
15%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 147, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 43%)
15%
20%
22%
43%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,744, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,941
  • Males3,852
  • Females4,024
  • Hispanic3,784
  • White3,985
  • Multirace4,495
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,941
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 202
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 202

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.2 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.7 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

18%
33%
33%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,852, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 12%)
23%
36%
29%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,024, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 19%)
13%
30%
38%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,784, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 9%)
27%
32%
32%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,985, Tested: 149, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 17%)
15%
33%
35%
17%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,495, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
17%
16%
17%
50%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,741
  • Males1,733
  • Females1,750
  • Hispanic1,690
  • White1,761
Math Average Scale Score:

1,741
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 225
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 227

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.8 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.1 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

12%
27%
39%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,733, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 20%)
13%
29%
38%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,750, Tested: 112, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 23%)
12%
24%
41%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,690, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 9%)
19%
38%
34%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,761, Tested: 157, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 26%)
9%
23%
42%
26%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,745
  • Males1,726
  • Females1,764
  • Hispanic1,705
  • White1,762
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,745
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 225
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 227

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.2 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

10%
26%
20%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,726, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 34%)
11%
31%
24%
34%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,764, Tested: 112, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 54%)
9%
20%
17%
54%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,705, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 31%)
16%
36%
17%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,762, Tested: 157, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 50%)
8%
21%
21%
50%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,215
  • Males4,180
  • Females4,250
  • Hispanic3,972
  • White4,316
Science Average Scale Score:

4,215
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 223
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 225

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

14%
17%
29%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,180, Tested: 112, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 38%)
14%
18%
30%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,250, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 41%)
14%
16%
29%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,972, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 22%)
24%
29%
25%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,316, Tested: 155, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 47%)
11%
12%
30%
47%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,832
  • Males3,819
  • Females3,844
  • Hispanic3,649
  • White3,900
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,832
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 224
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 225

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.4 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

30%
30%
17%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,819, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 27%)
29%
31%
13%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,844, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
32%
28%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,649, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 17%)
45%
34%
4%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,900, Tested: 156, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 27%)
26%
28%
19%
27%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • White5
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 7 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Danforth J H School:

13.2
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Danforth J H School:

3.8
Texas:

7.2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Wimberley, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Wimberley main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Danforth J H School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents