Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay. Few women look best with heavy makeup, her younger self would've looked good fresh-faced, and at this point heavy makeup on her would be a bothersome farce that wouldn't convince anyone she's in her Baywatch years. I like her internal transformation more, but that's not about fashion.
I think she looks better now than she did when she was younger. That is not saying that she wouldn't have looked better 30 years ago if she had decided to forego the makeup then.
But then, I have always preferred a more natural look. (Mary Ann vs. Ginger, and Jan Smither vs. Loni Anderson)
56? Of course, it's a professional photoshoot but she looks fine. Natural beauty is natural beauty and you are either beautiful, or no plaster and paint will fix it. I mean, there are men that like painted faces, but that's until the first wash.
A side shot, covered by a hat, shining like a greased biscuit - that is natural 56 after all the assistance?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.