City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 15.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Lake Eola Charter School (6.6 miles): | 98 |
| Jackson Heights Middle School (10.3 miles): | 70 |
| Endeavor Elementary School (18.8 miles): | 61 |
| Sanford Middle School (12.2 miles): | 55 |
| Zellwood Elementary School (16.0 miles): | 46 |
| Eagles Nest Elementary School (10.3 miles): | 35 |
| Meadowbrook Middle School (6.9 miles): | 20 |
| Summit Charter School: | 15 |
Summit Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Orange County: | 44 |
| Maitland: | 41 |
| Summit Charter School: | 15 |
1
Hester Gable
Sep 9, 2010 @ 12:12 pm
Is this a school for badly handicapped children or a school for children with some learning dissabilities?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 48
School number: 54
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 599-4004
Principal: Steve Palmer
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 22
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 53% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 92% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 632 |
| State average from 79 schools: | 530 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 577 |
| State average from 74 schools: | 556 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 512 |
| State average from 73 schools: | 537 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 72 schools: | 45% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 43% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 192
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 7% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (95%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 168
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1477 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1629 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1290 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 235 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 25% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1456 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 250 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 23% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1602 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 250 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 237 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1266 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1610 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 82% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1754 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1225 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 206 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 20% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1443 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 220 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1681 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 38% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1314 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 302 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1578 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1817 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1378 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%| Here: | 251 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1506 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1582 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%| Here: | 246 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%| Here: | 229 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1269 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 72%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1501 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1241 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%| Here: | 209 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1486 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 231 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1622 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%| Here: | 251 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 10| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1311 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1277 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%| Here: | 233 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1489 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1644 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%| Here: | 239 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1235 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1483 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 306 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1270 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 216 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1487 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%| Here: | 231 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1601 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%| Here: | 246 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 21 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 617 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 47 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 664 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 78 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 101 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 623 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 21 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 34 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 644 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 32 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 641 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 22 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%| Here: | 282 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 68%| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 221 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 675 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%| Here: | 197 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 904 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%| Here: | 204 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 929 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 110| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 819 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1124 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%| Here: | 216 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1072 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 234| Here: | 838 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1295 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%| Here: | 236 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1305 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 156| Here: | 1149 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1444 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 247 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1460 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 206| Here: | 1255 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1484 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%| Here: | 226 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1532 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 204| Here: | 1328 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%| Here: | 191 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%| Here: | 205 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 841 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%| Here: | 201 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1001 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%| Here: | 196 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1018 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 122| Here: | 896 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1072 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 96%| Here: | 207 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1049 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 45| Here: | 1004 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1161 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%| Here: | 191 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1184 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 33| Here: | 1151 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1456 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 224 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1482 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 283| Here: | 1199 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1612 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%| Here: | 249 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1640 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 285| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1354 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 10| Here: | 564 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 6
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 6
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 7
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 16| Here: | 587 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 6
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 21| Here: | 610 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 19| Here: | 620 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 35| Here: | 647 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 21| Here: | 640 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 11| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 558 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 5
Operations (max 11): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 16| SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 577 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 5
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 16| Here: | 600 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 5
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 21| Here: | 624 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 34| Here: | 648 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 28| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 22
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 91%| Here: | 169 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 5%
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 27
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 78%| Here: | 202 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 11%| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 41%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 26%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.