City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Plato South K-8 Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pinellas County: | 51 |
| Largo: | 46 |
| Plato South K-8 Charter School: | 5 |
1
Dan Raposa
Jul 19, 2015 @ 2:14 pm
If I live in 33771, is this the only school my 9 year old can get a bus to?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 7381
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Principal: Christine R Erp
Regular charter school.
School Web Address: http://mnorland.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 79 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 386 |
| State average from 79 schools: | 530 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 78 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 80 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 725 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 725 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 626
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 627
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 684 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 684 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 597
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 513 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 445
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 446
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 50% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 401 |
| State average from 74 schools: | 556 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 74 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 763 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 759 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 655
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 656
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 722 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 718 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 622
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 463 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 416
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 16% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 374 |
| State average from 73 schools: | 537 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 72 schools: | 45% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 73 schools: | 43% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 959 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 935 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 802
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 785
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 899 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 875 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 750
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 592 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 509
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 496
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 368 |
| State average from 66 schools: | 534 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 44% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 66 schools: | 49% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1157 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1145 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1104 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1091 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 572 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (91%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 6% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 82% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 289 |
| State average from 62 schools: | 413 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 44% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1359 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1323 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1282 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1249 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 715 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 699 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (92%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 166
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 77% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 286 |
| State average from 55 schools: | 395 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 45% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 55 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1774 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 285 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1767 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 5% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1846 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1921 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1787 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1772 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 28%| Here: | 271 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 282 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1854 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 282 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1917 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 63%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 371
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1717 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1795 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 30%| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 276 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1799 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1913 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 63%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 436 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 674 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 42 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 468 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 699 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 57 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 514
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%| Here: | 274 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1745 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1756 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 31| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1725 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1749 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 25%| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1747 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -13| Here: | 1760 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1805 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1816 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1743 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1880 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 57%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1881 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 54| Here: | 1827 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 583
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 50| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 519
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 42| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 576
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 55| PLATO SOUTH K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL: | 693 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 518
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 44| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 554
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%| Here: | 261 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.