City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Terrace Community Middle School (17.7 miles): | 92 |
| Coleman Middle School (16.4 miles): | 73 |
| Jennings Middle School (16.0 miles): | 53 |
| Pivot Charter School: | 46 |
| Stewart Middle Magnet School (15.6 miles): | 40 |
| Burnett Middle School (14.1 miles): | 27 |
| Middle -Plant City Area School (14.2 miles): | 16 |
| Lavoy Exceptional Center School (17.7 miles): | 3 |
Pivot Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Hillsborough County: | 42 |
| Riverview: | 43 |
| Pivot Charter School: | 46 |
1
Coleen Jackson
Mar 22, 2012 @ 9:09 am
Do you charge tuition to attend your school? Do you have morning and afternoon sessions?
2
megan
Mar 26, 2012 @ 1:13 pm
Where did this information come from? The Pivot Charter School in Riverview does not match any of this data
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
School number: 4211
School type: Senior High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Principal: Jayna Gaskell
Regular charter school.
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 503 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 53% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 473 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 473 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 416
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 416
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 276
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 276
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 141 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 136 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 532 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 134 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 422 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 373
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 374
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 165
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 533 |
| State average from 122 schools: | 535 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 126 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 61% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 374
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 37% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 63% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 555 |
| State average from 63 schools: | 461 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 446 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 253 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 253 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 82% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 57% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 399 |
| State average from 62 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 48% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 56% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Making Math Gains
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 59% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 401 |
| State average from 53 schools: | 362 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 51% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1324 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1523 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1597 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1406 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1529 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1350 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1603 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1590 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1408 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1594 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1619 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 144
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1372 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1560 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 316 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1596 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 301 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1410 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1498 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 159 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 628 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 57 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 114 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 647 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 144 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 666 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 72 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 117
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%| Here: | 312 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1310 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1554 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1566 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 149| Here: | 1417 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1624 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1624 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 104| Here: | 1520 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1363 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 314 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1495 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1503 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 151| Here: | 1352 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1678 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1679 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 179| Here: | 1500 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| Here: | 625 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 151
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 60| Here: | 641 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 663 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 628 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 149
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| Here: | 651 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| PIVOT CHARTER SCHOOL: | 666 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 151
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%| Here: | 310 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 72%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.