City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 40.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Chiles Middle School (16.2 miles): | 83 |
| Tuskawilla Middle School (18.7 miles): | 67 |
| Lyman High School (17.6 miles): | 56 |
| Rosenwald Center School (18.9 miles): | 46 |
| Heritage Middle School: | 40 |
| Deland Middle School (10.8 miles): | 36 |
| Middle Dd School (8.6 miles): | 29 |
| Scps Consequence Unit School (9.4 miles): | 3 |
| Three Springs Of Daytona School (17.0 miles): | 0 |
Heritage Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Volusia County: | 42 |
| Deltona: | 40 |
| Heritage Middle School: | 40 |
1
angelica rojas
Jun 8, 2011 @ 8:20 pm
I was wondering when does the heritage middle school report card comes out for us to pick up or for them to mail because there was not any news about "when the report card was going to come out".
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 64
School number: 7771
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 328-1308
Principal: Carolyn Carbonell
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 28
Senate District: 7
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 562 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1233 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1233 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 415
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1129
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 626 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 626 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 586
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 586
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 408 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 408 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 149
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 748 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 748 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 241
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 674
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 571 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1287 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 429
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1164
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 686 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 686 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 240
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 636
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 633
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 390 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 697 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 697 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 231
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 614
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 610
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 525 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 50% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1398 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1399 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 441
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1222
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 786 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 786 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 249
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 399 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 398 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 331
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 330
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 701 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 702 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 223
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 527 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1448 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1447 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 839 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 838 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 381 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 681 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 680 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 69% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 428 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1404 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1403 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 838 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 838 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 678 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 677 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 226 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 407 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1714 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1849 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1895 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1695 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1824 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1887 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 318 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1791 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1901 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1659 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1802 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1898 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 458
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1659 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 302 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1803 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1868 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1806 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1864 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 477 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 666 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 59 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 450 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 686 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 462 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 690 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 468
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 298 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1679 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1690 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 46| Here: | 1644 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1798 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1803 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 95| Here: | 1709 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1855 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1864 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1630 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1638 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -4| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1785 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1790 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 105| Here: | 1685 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1873 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 315 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1883 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 122| HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1761 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 491
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 64| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 458
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 678 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 491
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 66| Here: | 690 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 491
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 458
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 685 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 491
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 72| Here: | 702 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 486
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 285 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.