Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Some of those phrases go way back. I remember my mother saying something cost an arm and a leg" when I was a little kid in the 60s and thinking it was funny.
This Senator Refused To Vote On This Bill for This Reason.
Young People Flocking to This City.
Also, vague headlines that tempt you to click, just to find out what the heck they're talking about, e.g.:
Fox News: Major city welcomes 28 migrants bused from Texas, many plan to travel to other states, officials say what "major city"? You have to click to find out.
Actually, Fox News does this as a matter of course. I've noticed Wall Street Journal would just go ahead and name the city in the title.
To be fair, Fox and other "free" news websites are ad supported and need the page views. WSJ is paywalled so can afford to act more like a traditional newspaper.
This Senator Refused To Vote On This Bill for This Reason.
Young People Flocking to This City.
Also, vague headlines that tempt you to click, just to find out what the heck they're talking about, e.g.:
Fox News: Major city welcomes 28 migrants bused from Texas, many plan to travel to other states, officials say what "major city"? You have to click to find out.
Actually, Fox News does this as a matter of course. I've noticed Wall Street Journal would just go ahead and name the city in the title.
To be fair, Fox and other "free" news websites are ad supported and need the page views. WSJ is paywalled so can afford to act more like a traditional newspaper.
Here's another example:
Fox News: "Jury reaches verdict in Kevin Spacey sex assault trial"
Wall Street Journal: "Spacey Found Not Liable in Sexual-Misconduct Case"
See what I'm talking about? One makes you click through to find out WHAT the verdict is. The other simply states the verdict (and even takes up less space).
I remember that. And "gaslighting" shouldn't mean anything other than what it meant back in the 1940s, when the George Kukor film came out (which was apparently based on a 1938 play).
Agree, rewatched the film recently; excellent. Also read a few articles regarding why "gaslighting" is "trendy." True, language evolves, though even the psychology world is concerned current use of word has strayed beyond the serious intentional psychological manipulation causing a person to question reality. Understand how current events, media, etc. influence how people are using the word so will be interesting to see if it's a mere trend... Remember "social engineering?"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.