Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When it came out I would have liked to have bought this car but it was out of my price range at the time. Two things about the car I didn’t like were the name and the CVT. It looked good both inside and out. The interior felt upscale in build quality and materials. The base engine was fine but there was no more powerful uplevel engine. It handled well for a family sedan. Rear seat room was lacking for adults. One advantage it had over some of its competitors is it had available a manual transmission for more driving fun. Now if only it had a more powerful engine option it could have been really fun especially with the available AWD model.
Location: Butler County Ohio and Winters in Florida
929 posts, read 2,722,327 times
Reputation: 635
I know this is an older thread, but I have seen a few of these Kizashi s pop up used lately.
Good looking cars.
On a similar note, my son loves his 2012 SX4 suv, it has over 50k and 100% trouble free.
Suzuki cars sold in North America were all made by Daewoo or other plants in South Korea.
As I stated in other places - for North America - Mazda or Mitsubishi should market the Suzuki Jimny.
Nope.
The Suzuki Swift and it’s other ‘badging’ in the U.S. and other parts of North America (various Chevrolet/Geo, Pontiac, etc. models over the generations) weren’t assembled in South Korea.
Yes, Suzuki had cars and SUV's made in Canada. And there there is Jimmy McGill's Suzuki Esteem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.