Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Top Biden administration officials worked with the National Archives to develop Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump involving the former president’s alleged mishandling of classified material, according to recently unsealed court documents in the case pending in southern Florida.
...
The new disclosures indicate the Department of Justice was in touch with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) during much of 2021, undermining the DOJ’s claims that it became involved in the matter only after the Archives sent it a criminal referral on February 9, 2022, based on the findings of records with “classified markings” in 15 boxes of materials Trump gave to the Archives a month prior.
...
Trump’s lawyers first filed the heavily redacted material in a January motion, under a standing protective order issued by the court to initially conceal potentially sensitive information. His team then asked U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over the matter in southern Florida, to remove many of those redactions based on her review.
A protracted battle ensued as Smith fought to keep large portions of the motion and accompanying exhibits from the public. Smith told Cannon that disclosing the material would jeopardize the investigation and expose potential witnesses and government employees to "significant and immediate risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment."
You know who is harassed? Me - with this nonsense.
Judge Cannon ordered the doc to be unredacted.
I have linked to both the redacted version, AND the unredacted version of the document so we can play along at home.
The above is pages 6-7 - which is an example of how the DOJ (Jonathan Su) and NARA (Gary Stern) were discussing the case before Team Trump was notified - which Stern called atypical (highlighted above).
Nary a TDS sufferer will change his/her opinion. This revelation means nothing to them (even though it certainly DOES to any rational person).
Well, the thing is, these revelations look like something on a surface level, but often turn out to be nothing when dug into, beyond the grabby headlines.
Having said that, I appreciate the OP actually linking the docs and if there’s something there by all means it should be brought to the light.
I see these are more accusations by Julie Kelly, who has already been found to be loose with facts in the other thread.
Nary a TDS sufferer will change his/her opinion. This revelation means nothing to them (even though it certainly DOES to any rational person).
Well said. Time and time again the Left has shown us that they do not care about Facts. They operate on Feelings alone. They might not even know why but they Hate Trump.
Top Biden administration officials worked with the National Archives to develop Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump involving the former president’s alleged mishandling of classified material, according to recently unsealed court documents in the case pending in southern Florida.
...
The new disclosures indicate the Department of Justice was in touch with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) during much of 2021, undermining the DOJ’s claims that it became involved in the matter only after the Archives sent it a criminal referral on February 9, 2022, based on the findings of records with “classified markings” in 15 boxes of materials Trump gave to the Archives a month prior.
...
Trump’s lawyers first filed the heavily redacted material in a January motion, under a standing protective order issued by the court to initially conceal potentially sensitive information. His team then asked U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over the matter in southern Florida, to remove many of those redactions based on her review.
A protracted battle ensued as Smith fought to keep large portions of the motion and accompanying exhibits from the public. Smith told Cannon that disclosing the material would jeopardize the investigation and expose potential witnesses and government employees to "significant and immediate risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment."
You know who is harassed? Me - with this nonsense.
Judge Cannon ordered the doc to be unredacted.
I have linked to both the redacted version, AND the unredacted version of the document so we can play along at home.
The above is pages 6-7 - which is an example of how the DOJ (Jonathan Su) and NARA (Gary Stern) were discussing the case before Team Trump was notified - which Stern called atypical (highlighted above).
shouldn't multiple people be going to jail over this?
Status:
"I Choose Freedom Over Democracy!"
(set 12 days ago)
Location: Crooked Pennsylvania
1,343 posts, read 671,959 times
Reputation: 2288
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga
shouldn't multiple people be going to jail over this?
As some of the resident scum would say, "Where is the evidence?"..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
