Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-16-2019, 05:45 AM
 
2,646 posts, read 1,847,522 times
Reputation: 3107

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Moron. pelosi said "NOT 1 DOLLAR" and WE got OVER 1 BILLION dollars.
Bi-Partisan, negotiating and adults compromised on the bill; something your president seems to know nothing about. His "my way or the highway," tactics he used in his corrupt business deals may not always work for the dude. And who are "WE"? Are you part of his administration?

Trump said in his speech in the rose garden, that he did not need to do the wall quickly, apparently he needs to tear our country apart, so he can campaign and take us down the stupid road, again. I hope he is not going to take the need for decent military housing, infrastructure, money from more important issues away from Americans.

Having a president and commander in chief, who is for his own ego is getting ridiculous and ever so tiring.

Is he trying to pad his pockets, somehow, with "our," money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2019, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
We are only talking about about several YARDS or property.
So, they are building just few yards of wall here and there? What's the point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,220,852 times
Reputation: 8537
Check out the owners of the LLC, who get the contracts. Trump, Cabinet and their family will be benefiting from this thing. It's the only reason he does anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 05:54 AM
 
7,982 posts, read 4,291,201 times
Reputation: 6744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riley. View Post
Please let go of this meme. You know very well what he meant by that comment.
He meant Mexico will pay for it, and American taxpayers will not have to cough up any of their hard-earned money.

You can see it here:


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zfxBs5y5eIo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riley. View Post
Please let go of this meme. You know very well what he meant by that comment.
You mean he meant the opposite of what he actually said.

"Mexico will pay for the wall" can only mean what is says.

But instead of Mexico paying for it, Trump is grabbing unauthorized American taxpayer money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:09 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,970 posts, read 9,664,852 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Trump stood in the Rose Garden and stated he didn't need to declare a national emergency.

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/st...94433187651586

Now it is either a national emergency or it is not.

Which is it?
Not
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:16 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,970 posts, read 9,664,852 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
You mean he meant the opposite of what he actually said.

"Mexico will pay for the wall" can only mean what is says.

But instead of Mexico paying for it, Trump is grabbing unauthorized American taxpayer money.
Thank you Finn_Jarber
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:22 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
DONALD TRUMP NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION SLAMMED BY CONSERVATIVE GROUPS: ‘ERODES’ 200 YEARS OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...icized-1333700

Not only are progressives and Democrats lamenting the decision, but a collection of right-leaning business groups and think tanks—generally aligned with the Republican Party—have also joined the chorus warning Trump’s declaration could set a dangerous precedent for American politics.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul warned the declaration is likely unconstitutional, Maine Senator Susan Collins said the move would be a “mistake,” and Michigan Representative Justin Amashsaid the president was “attempting to circumvent the constitution” over a “non-emergency.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,320 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"It may be fine with you that your southern neighbors have their property seized by the Federal government"


Oh, please STOP with wild exaggerations.


We are only talking about about several YARDS or property.


People EVERY DAY face eminent domain to build new road, bridges buildings, etc.
It’s more than seven yards, it’s access roads, detention centers and construction. Do you recall the eminent domain for the pipeline a few years ago right there in Texas,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2019, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Central IL
20,722 posts, read 16,386,025 times
Reputation: 50380
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanAdventurer View Post
Possibly. And I still don't really get the gist of why Democrats think better border security with Mexico is a bad idea in the first place. (I can speculate but...) But I mean how are they really standing there with a straight face trying to sell this to the country as some big fight they need to win against the President so that...the border can remain less secure? Why would anybody be for that? It's a perfect example of how ridiculous American politics has become.
Because you and they are single-mindedly (and simple mindedly) associating a big bad physical medieval wall with the only way to make our borders "secure".

I guess you have never heard that 90% of drugs come in via "ports of entry"? Those are places where we LET people in, on purpose! Maybe we can beef up detection methods and add staffing? How will a bigger or better wall help THERE? ...and that's just one way to add security without it being a WALL. Simple thinking gives simple answers...not good ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top