Violence Against Women Act of 2013 passed the Senate 78-22 and GOP refuses to renew (house of representatives, illegal)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The six highest ranking Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee all voted against it:
– Grassley
– Hatch
– Graham
– Cornyn
– Lee
– Cruz
Quote:
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has not called for a vote on a full authorization of the the bill, despite calls to do so, including from 46 members of his own party, as well as Democratic leaders and more than 50 attorneys general.
GOP will let it expire end of September, focus on their effort to push Kavanaugh into the highest judicial office.
The six highest ranking Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee all voted against it:
– Grassley
– Hatch
– Graham
– Cornyn
– Lee
– Cruz
GOP will let it expire end of September, focus on their effort to push Kavanaugh into the highest judicial office.
And Cruz fans are complaining abut Cruz being heckled at a restaurant...
If the GOP condemned violence against women they would need to address the sexual assaulter in the White House. We already know they lack the cojones to do so. Easier to throw more than half the population under the bus to keep their sexual assaulter propped up.
The old white men in the Senate need to go. They are way past their expiration date.
The six highest ranking Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee all voted against it:
– Grassley
– Hatch
– Graham
– Cornyn
– Lee
– Cruz
GOP will let it expire end of September, focus on their effort to push Kavanaugh into the highest judicial office.
What is in the act that wasn't there before?
Was violence against women legal before the act?
If the GOP condemned violence against women they would need to address the sexual assaulter in the White House. We already know they lack the cojones to do so. Easier to throw more than half the population under the bus to keep their sexual assaulter propped up.
The old white men in the Senate need to go. They are way past their expiration date.
If the GOP condemned violence against women they would need to address the sexual assaulter in the White House. We already know they lack the cojones to do so. Easier to throw more than half the population under the bus to keep their sexual assaulter propped up.
The old white men in the Senate need to go. They are way past their expiration date.
So, you just didn't care before ? From this list , I only went back 17 years...it looks like both sides have issues. I'm sure you just ignore that fact though.
-List of American federal politicians convicted of crimes-
(I went and picked out the sexual assaults. )
2017–Present (Donald J. Trump (R) presidency)
-no sexual assaults-
2009–2017 (Barack Obama (D) presidency) Anthony Weiner (D-NY) was convicted of sending sexually explicit photos of himself to a 15-year-old girl and was made to sign the sexual offenders register. (2017)
Dennis Hastert (R-IL) Speaker of the United States House of Representatives pleaded guilty in court for illegally structuring bank transactions related to payment of $3.5 million to quash allegations of sexual misconduct with a student when he was a high school teacher and coach decades ago. (2016)
Mark E. Fuller (R) U.S. District Judge was found guilty of domestic violence and sentenced to 24 weeks of family and domestic training and forced to resign his position. (2015)
2001–2009 (George W. Bush (R) presidency)
-no sexual assaults-
1993–2001 (Bill Clinton (D) presidency) Mel Reynolds (D-IL) was convicted on 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography. (1997) He was later convicted of 12 counts of bank fraud. (1999)
We already have a violence against everybody act built into our laws. No need for this.
Agree, but as usual theconversation gets turned into look who voted against it rather than the validity of the act in the first place.
The pro side (pandering to the female voter side) will try to paint those so opposed as condoning violence against women. Patently ridiculous, but so it goes with politics.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.