Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2022, 01:43 PM
 
1,344 posts, read 1,743,958 times
Reputation: 1750

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by artillery77 View Post
Persistent inflation would likely be a reason to have children as opposed to not having children. Not a good reason, but at our current rates, we're looking at doubling the cost of everything within a decade. It may become increasingly difficult to save enough to actually retire.
Whattttttt? You can’t be serious! Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2022, 04:40 PM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,596,932 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by artillery77 View Post
Persistent inflation would likely be a reason to have children as opposed to not having children. Not a good reason, but at our current rates, we're looking at doubling the cost of everything within a decade. It may become increasingly difficult to save enough to actually retire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by papafox View Post
Whattttttt? You can’t be serious! Why?
It takes about two decades for the effects of a drop in birth rates to be felt in the workforce.

So imagine 100 people working and then in about 20 years that 100 people would be replaced by half. I'm sure the fed could raise interest rates to match, but who could afford it? Who could afford the taxes? 2.5 million people are missing from the workforce today; not because they don't want to work. But simply because they weren't born. That's why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2022, 10:11 PM
 
5,455 posts, read 3,389,157 times
Reputation: 12177
OP, I get your point.

Babies are made whether we want it or not. We can prepare ourselves with birth control methods but it still happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2022, 10:19 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 776,117 times
Reputation: 2042
We’ve had about 10 years of decent-good economy and birth rates are low…be interesting see how much lower they can go as the good times end (are ending). I personally know like one person with 4 kids…everybody else 2, 1 or 0. In my grandparents time (40s and 50s) it seems like it was common for women to have 3, 4, 5 kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:16 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,081 posts, read 31,313,313 times
Reputation: 47561
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
I suspect that the cost of raising children rarely figures into the equation. That's not what the decision is based on and I also suspect that quite often having a child isn't a decision at all, it is just something that isn't planned.
Many, many younger couples have deferred having children in recent years due to financial considerations. I'm sure many have decided not to.

I've never particularly wanted kids, but financial considerations were definitely considered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:30 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 776,117 times
Reputation: 2042
I could see some young people thinking you have to be pretty well off nowadays to really care for a child…obviously need a reliable vehicle, a house in a good neighborhood (now $300k+ in most areas) debt paid off or down, good amount in savings. If you think like that kids could be put off a long long time. Of course sometimes they happen no matter how you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2022, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,069 posts, read 7,241,915 times
Reputation: 17146
Birthrates in the U.S. have been low and declining ever since 2000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2022, 08:49 AM
 
22,192 posts, read 19,227,493 times
Reputation: 18322
two things come to mind.
1. people who want to have kids, will continue to have kids.
2. however i think in general more and more people will choose to NOT have kids. we are already seeing that in many places. and that trend will continue to grow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2022, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,586 posts, read 84,818,250 times
Reputation: 115121
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
I could see some young people thinking you have to be pretty well off nowadays to really care for a child…obviously need a reliable vehicle, a house in a good neighborhood (now $300k+ in most areas) debt paid off or down, good amount in savings. If you think like that kids could be put off a long long time. Of course sometimes they happen no matter how you think.
Yup, I raised a kid without being able to afford a home of my own (but did rent in a safe town with good schools--my daughter has two Bachelors, a Masters, and a PhD), and I was ALWAYS in debt because I wanted to provide her with the advantages of music and other extra-curricular activities. Of course, when I had her, I was married and the plans were different, but people change, and life doesn't always go as planned.

If you wait for the perfect circumstances, you may never have a child. I couldn't wait much longer because I was already 33 when I had her, but I did have a solid job and knew I could support her alone if needed and/or with the help of family, and that turned out to be exactly the case.

A reliable vehicle can be just that and not a fancy newer car that will impress your neighbors. I drove old cars because I commuted to work via public transportation and couldn't afford both a car payment and a train ticket every month, and if we took a trip for a weekend or something, I rented a better vehicle.

The perfect people's "musts" are not everyone's.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: https://www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2022, 11:27 AM
 
9,952 posts, read 6,679,067 times
Reputation: 19661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tzaphkiel View Post
two things come to mind.
1. people who want to have kids, will continue to have kids.
2. however i think in general more and more people will choose to NOT have kids. we are already seeing that in many places. and that trend will continue to grow.
I think within group 1, people who want to have kids may have kids, but not as many as they initially planned to have. For example, I think my sister originally planned to have 2 kids. She lives in the most expensive area of the country and ended up having only one child. It took her 2-3 years to find a house they could afford, but it requires lots of renovations (still in the process). I’m in Chicagoland and that isn’t unusual here too. I have neighbors and coworkers with one and the benefit is that they have money to afford a lot more enrichment activities for the one.

I think China is a good case study. After forced one-child policy for decades, birth rates are continuing to decline even though one-child ended in 2015 and last year introduced three-child because birth rates are continuing to decline. The people of childbearing age now were born during one-child and it doesn’t seem like they see any benefit to having more than one child themselves. I think in other countries, you have people who have siblings and can talk about the benefits or understand what it means to have a sibling. When the option is either to have one or be penalized, one can see how people who grew up with that would elect to stick with having the one.

I don’t have children and do know people who choose not to have kids. Most of my friends have kids, but I do know married/partnered people who never had children and are too old to start now. I think a lot of them do have pets though, as others have pointed out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top