Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2016, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Western Colorado
12,858 posts, read 16,875,803 times
Reputation: 33510

Advertisements

HWY 50 is a great scenic drive through small towns and mountain passes. I would hate to see the government ruin that by spending trillions to build an interstate. And you wouldn't get to see the world's deepest hand dug well.


Anyway, where does one think the money would come from building any new interstate? They can't repair the ones we have now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2016, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Aurora, CO
8,606 posts, read 14,894,836 times
Reputation: 15405
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim9251 View Post
HWY 50 is a great scenic drive through small towns and mountain passes. I would hate to see the government ruin that by spending trillions to build an interstate. And you wouldn't get to see the world's deepest hand dug well.


Anyway, where does one think the money would come from building any new interstate? They can't repair the ones we have now.
I wouldn't be too worried about it because it's not going to happen. There's more than enough east-west capacity to last us the next century or more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluescreen73 View Post
I wouldn't be too worried about it because it's not going to happen. There's more than enough east-west capacity to last us the next century or more.
Even if it's not made into a interstate anytime soon it should be 4 lanes at least in Colorado as a back up to I-70. This latest closure of I-70 shows how that is needed as many people are taking highway 50.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2022, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,409 posts, read 4,636,014 times
Reputation: 3925
As of the 15th, President Biden signed into law to extend I-27 (ports to plains) corridor. This only includes the parts in TX for now. The goal is finish the rest until it reaches I-70 near Limon.

https://www.kcbd.com/2022/03/15/port...ederal-budget/

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2022, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,409 posts, read 4,636,014 times
Reputation: 3925
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2022, 12:21 PM
 
26,218 posts, read 49,052,722 times
Reputation: 31791
Thanks for the update. So far the proposed funding only covers some upgrades within Texas and doesn't include that leg of the route from the port of Brownsville up to Laredo.

At 74 I'll never live to see much of this . . . a sadness given that we built the bulk of the 48,000 mile interstate system in just 20 years (1956-1976) but now it seems to take forever to get anything done.

When I look at the overall map in Post #4 it seems they should've named this thing the NAFTA Connector.

We should be expanding our main east-west rail corridors to take truck traffic off highways, especially with a shortage of long-haul truck drivers, the fuel consumption of large trucks and the pollution they cause.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2022, 07:55 PM
 
6,825 posts, read 10,522,918 times
Reputation: 8392
I like the idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2022, 01:14 PM
 
643 posts, read 2,386,005 times
Reputation: 535
That road in Colorado is already a HEAVY truck route. It is silky smooth concrete most of the way. Dallas to Denver truck drivers generally prefer US 287 instead of I-25 over Raton Pass. Cars tend to get off in Dumas, Texas and head over to Raton, NM and up 25 but the big rigs just keep rolling North...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2022, 07:12 PM
 
1,227 posts, read 1,281,689 times
Reputation: 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
As of the 15th, President Biden signed into law to extend I-27 (ports to plains) corridor. This only includes the parts in TX for now.
Not quite.

Quote:
Part of funding legislation signed by President Biden on Tuesday designates the Texas and New Mexico portions of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor as a future interstate, making these portions eligible for increased funding tocomplete the I-27 expansion into a four-lane federal highway.
So that strongly implies they're going to make a west turn at Dumas and follow US-87 and US-64 to Raton.

The Raton to Wichita Falls road has sometimes been suggested as future I-32, but that'll go by the wayside if this is designated as I-27.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2022, 05:37 PM
 
Location: The 719
18,022 posts, read 27,468,060 times
Reputation: 17349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
The route for I-27 would go from Campo connect to Lamar, then north to Kit Carson on US 287. From there, it goes slightly east toward Burlington and connects up with US 385. Going north, it meets up at Wray, then to Holyoke, then north through Julesburg.

The purpose of building I-27 is to reduce traffic off state highways, and connect the missing link from Amarillo, TX to Minot, ND.
This makes total sense to me. Interstates west of the Mississippi seem to be in the dark ages. The roadways in Colorado are the most senseless I've seen throughout the US and seem to lag 20-40 years behind places back east.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top