Besides the obvious, what cities have good public transportation? (Atlanta, Boston, Chicago)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
SF, NYC, Chicago, Boston, and DC are always said as having good PT. What other cities could be considered to have good PT? Most residents in most other cities would own cars, but in what cities could residents regularly take rail or bus lines for common outings, but use a car sometimes as well?
Philly should belong to the obvious side for this one I think. Pretty much everyone knows it has decent public transportation, although not very well maintained.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX
Portland. Philadelphia does too if I'm not mistaken.
The Twin Cities may gain respectability in 15-20 years when we have a network of trains/subways but it's still in the very early stages of development right now. Currently all that's running is one light rail line with a heavy rail line connecting the northern suburbs opening in November and another light rail line opening for service in 2014. Beyond that several other projects are in the preliminary planning stages. Currently the public transportation is far inferior to Philadelphia based soley on that posted metro map.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.