Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011, 06:36 PM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,133,323 times
Reputation: 119

Advertisements

Hi all.

Here's something I thought would make an interesting topic:

What major city in the US probably has the biggest difference in its census population and its probable population. it could be because of illegal immigrants or that people are just very lazy. if u could say what the population difference probably is, please do.

I have heard that Houston could be doubled in population. but i would assume LA and San Diego could too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2011, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Virginia Highland, GA
1,937 posts, read 4,714,677 times
Reputation: 1293
Atlanta city was screwed way too low..................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2011, 09:40 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,221,630 times
Reputation: 11356
Atlanta
Chicago
Houston
Dallas
Phoenix

they call came in MUCH less than city officials, states and the census themselves had calculated. They're cities where the situation on the ground just doesn't match up with how many people stepped forward to be counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 08:46 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,168,327 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
Atlanta
Chicago
Houston
Dallas
Phoenix

they call came in MUCH less than city officials, states and the census themselves had calculated. They're cities where the situation on the ground just doesn't match up with how many people stepped forward to be counted.
This thread is stupid. Every city in the US is in this situation. NY and LA easily could have hundreds of thousands of people that were not counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,665 posts, read 67,579,201 times
Reputation: 21255
The Census says Oakland is 10% smaller than the State of CAs figures.

390,000 vs 435,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,665 posts, read 67,579,201 times
Reputation: 21255
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
This thread is stupid. Every city in the US is in this situation.
And this is a great thread for us to complain about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Weymouth, The South
785 posts, read 1,884,014 times
Reputation: 475
There is a constant cry from many city residents that their cities were under counted. All you have to base that on is estimates, which themselves were based on the previous census, which I imagine they'd have though was wrong at that time, but has somehow been assumed right as time's gone by. I suspect that in a few years, the estimates based on this census will be seen in a similar light.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:18 AM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,394,550 times
Reputation: 788
Easily NYC and maybe LA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,665 posts, read 67,579,201 times
Reputation: 21255
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceTenmile View Post
There is a constant cry from many city residents that their cities were under counted. All you have to base that on is estimates, which themselves were based on the previous census, which I imagine they'd have though was wrong at that time, but has somehow been assumed right as time's gone by. I suspect that in a few years, the estimates based on this census will be seen in a similar light.
That's fine but in the meantime, these cities have to provided services for thousands of undercounted people without any federal funding--which is a royal pain to say the least.

And for cities, that's what the census is for the for the most part-to determine how much federal funds to allocate to local municipalities.

This is not the only instance where the federal government essentially shrieks its responsibility and turns a blind eye to the problems their inaction or incorrect data collecting causes.

The issue of illegal immigration is a MAJOR problem for states, counties and cities specifically because its a FEDERAL ISSUE but they are NOT enforcing their own laws. Meanwhile a state like CA has to pay for health care and education for 3-5 Million estimated illegals who are not counted in the census.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2011, 09:22 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,961,911 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceTenmile View Post
There is a constant cry from many city residents that their cities were under counted. All you have to base that on is estimates, which themselves were based on the previous census, which I imagine they'd have though was wrong at that time, but has somehow been assumed right as time's gone by. I suspect that in a few years, the estimates based on this census will be seen in a similar light.

There is probably a lot of truth to this; I think this also is more evidensed in cities with changing demographics that create differances in the number of people per houshould/family size. Some of the cities that were projected higher are likely experiencing this relative to the census counts and this phenomenon is not new.

Though the census likely undercounts most places and some more than others especially where there is more potential of undercounted illegals they may have a greater fear of being counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top