Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most Australian state?
Western Australia 4 22.22%
Tasmania 1 5.56%
Queensland 6 33.33%
South Australia 1 5.56%
New South Wales 5 27.78%
Victoria 1 5.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2023, 12:41 AM
 
Location: Brisbane
5,058 posts, read 7,496,471 times
Reputation: 4531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by herenow1 View Post
That won't happen for over a hundred years' time. Not even get 100 million. Unlikely 50 million. It more likely be like: 38,089,401. Worldwide population growth rate is declining in most places. China population is expected to drop by half then, USA population will be unlikely to reach 400 million people then either.https://www.populationpyramid.net/po...-country/2100/

Only places with big growth are Africa and the Indian subcontinent then.
Immigration is always the X factor. 25 years ago the ABS were predicting Australia's population "could grow to between 23.5 and 26.4 million by the year 2051"

https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@...3?OpenDocument

We have already hit that upper projection a cool 28 years earlier than forecast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2023, 01:20 AM
 
5,743 posts, read 3,595,151 times
Reputation: 8905
I've only been to Darwin. But Darwin is much like Abilene Kansas, and Abilene is quintessentially American, I'll go with NT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2023, 02:12 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 720,811 times
Reputation: 1330
Fellas... we have the land mass, but simply dont have the climate and fertile productive soils to support a population a la the USA.
So the oldest continent is also the driest, combine that with poor soils, the cycle of droughts and flooding rains, the country is flat out supporting a doubling of the present population.
Ecologically, socially, politically ( ie Indigenous issues, land rights, cultural sensitivities ) one cannot build new dams in AU; Of course we can build de-salination plants in the bigger cities for water supply, but cannot build new dams for either domestic water supply or agricultural irrigation.
No way in the 21st century would a Snowy Mountains Scheme or Ord River Scheme get past the enviro and cultural regulations.... hell, cant even put in new sewerage outfalls from the big cities offshore.
The AU population is one of the most highly urbanised in the Western World.... the vast majority of the population hugs the climatically equiable East Coast... its tough to eke out a living out in the vast Outback regions.
AU is blessed with natural resources... we are the mines supplying the manufacturing powerhouses of Asia. We no longer manufacture consumer products ourselves....
As has been mentioned previously, we have not only a skilled labour shortage, but also a shortage of people willing to do the harder menial tasks... immigration on paper seems like the saviour in this case.... but also the country is in a housing crisis atm... supply that is, both the rental and private ownership market.
Where are all the migrants going to be housed ? In an allready overheated market ?
And the new arrivals to AU gravitate to the big cities of Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, putting more stresses upon the water and power resouces, the available housing markets. I just cant see the pop of AU much past 50 million in the future.
PS/- lived in Darwin 43 years... its as Aussie as you can find....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2023, 03:47 AM
 
Location: West Midlands, England
678 posts, read 408,406 times
Reputation: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by arr430 View Post
I've only been to Darwin. But Darwin is much like Abilene Kansas, and Abilene is quintessentially American, I'll go with NT.
Somewhere in the US states of Ohio, Indiana or Illinois would be more quintessentially American imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2023, 06:17 AM
 
5,743 posts, read 3,595,151 times
Reputation: 8905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doughboy1918 View Post
Somewhere in the US states of Ohio, Indiana or Illinois would be more quintessentially American imo.
OK, Darwin is a lot like Vincennes, Indiana. Still works for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2023, 04:04 PM
 
1,473 posts, read 1,343,410 times
Reputation: 1183
Quote:
Originally Posted by greysrigging View Post
Fellas... we have the land mass, but simply dont have the climate and fertile productive soils to support a population a la the USA.
So the oldest continent is also the driest, combine that with poor soils, the cycle of droughts and flooding rains, the country is flat out supporting a doubling of the present population.

Ecologically, socially, politically ( ie Indigenous issues, land rights, cultural sensitivities ) one cannot build new dams in AU; Of course we can build de-salination plants in the bigger cities for water supply, but cannot build new dams for either domestic water supply or agricultural irrigation.
No way in the 21st century would a Snowy Mountains Scheme or Ord River Scheme get past the enviro and cultural regulations.... hell, cant even put in new sewerage outfalls from the big cities offshore.
The AU population is one of the most highly urbanised in the Western World.... the vast majority of the population hugs the climatically equiable East Coast... its tough to eke out a living out in the vast Outback regions.
AU is blessed with natural resources... we are the mines supplying the manufacturing powerhouses of Asia. We no longer manufacture consumer products ourselves....
As has been mentioned previously, we have not only a skilled labour shortage, but also a shortage of people willing to do the harder menial tasks... immigration on paper seems like the saviour in this case.... but also the country is in a housing crisis atm... supply that is, both the rental and private ownership market.
Where are all the migrants going to be housed ? In an allready overheated market ?
And the new arrivals to AU gravitate to the big cities of Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, putting more stresses upon the water and power resouces, the available housing markets. I just cant see the pop of AU much past 50 million in the future.
PS/- lived in Darwin 43 years... its as Aussie as you can find....
Australia is actually a large exporter of agricultural commodities and products, so is already feeding a population well in excess of its own.

People tend to forget how wet, lush and uninhabited the tropical north is. Darwin gets over 1,800mm of precipitation a year, while European cities like Berlin average around 500mm. Even inland NT towns like Catherine get around 1,100mm per year. The Old River in WA is probably the only place in the north where that agricultural potential has been taken advantage of on a moderate scale, primarily due to the lack of population to support transport and the services you need to keep those industries going.

Towns like Alice Springs in Central Australia are actually pretty liveable, and folk who do live there typically like it. It's just that people from places like Sydney and Melbourne just aren't used to constant subzero winter mornings, summer days in the mid 40Cs, and the lack of humidity. But that's all psychological; seriously, you get used to it pretty quickly. They are dependent on aquifers for water supply, but so are large parts of the US south west.

Property markets are all about supply and demand. Perhaps there just needs to be more sustained and considered focus on the former.

On the flip side though, I'm glad there are huge tracts of pristine wilderness in most parts of Australia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2023, 05:47 PM
 
6,037 posts, read 5,944,794 times
Reputation: 3606
Quote:
Originally Posted by arr430 View Post
I've only been to Darwin. But Darwin is much like Abilene Kansas, and Abilene is quintessentially American, I'll go with NT.
I've lived in Darwin and tend to agree if quiescently Australian place is asked for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2023, 04:01 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 720,811 times
Reputation: 1330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakery Hill View Post
Australia is actually a large exporter of agricultural commodities and products, so is already feeding a population well in excess of its own.

People tend to forget how wet, lush and uninhabited the tropical north is. Darwin gets over 1,800mm of precipitation a year, while European cities like Berlin average around 500mm. Even inland NT towns like Catherine get around 1,100mm per year. The Old River in WA is probably the only place in the north where that agricultural potential has been taken advantage of on a moderate scale, primarily due to the lack of population to support transport and the services you need to keep those industries going.

Towns like Alice Springs in Central Australia are actually pretty liveable, and folk who do live there typically like it. It's just that people from places like Sydney and Melbourne just aren't used to constant subzero winter mornings, summer days in the mid 40Cs, and the lack of humidity. But that's all psychological; seriously, you get used to it pretty quickly. They are dependent on aquifers for water supply, but so are large parts of the US south west.

Property markets are all about supply and demand. Perhaps there just needs to be more sustained and considered focus on the former.

On the flip side though, I'm glad there are huge tracts of pristine wilderness in most parts of Australia.
As I mentioned previously.... land is mostly locked up away from the fertile coasts.... trust me when I say the deep tropical north with its 1800mm of rain is no way able to support a population in the millions... its flat out providing for the quarter of a million pop we have atm.... the rain all falls in a very short window of around 5 months.... the rest of the year if mostly rainless.... as I mentioned earlier, we cannot politically, environmentally or culturally build dams in the NT....
Alice Springs is a desert region ( about 12" per annum of very variabe rainfall ie some years only 3 or 4", other years 30" inches.) with no permanent water resources, and litterally no productive agricultural land other than 1000 square kilometer cattle properties.... it barely supports the 30k pop in the region...
Consider this... the NT area of land is 1.42m klm squared.... pop about 250k
Texas area is 695,662 km² so about half the NT, and a pop of 30 million....
Why do you think this is the case ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2023, 06:01 AM
 
1,473 posts, read 1,343,410 times
Reputation: 1183
Quote:
Originally Posted by greysrigging View Post
Consider this... the NT area of land is 1.42m klm squared.... pop about 250k
Texas area is 695,662 km² so about half the NT, and a pop of 30 million....
Why do you think this is the case?
It's essentially the same reason why Tasmania has about 10% of the population of Ireland (the Republic of Ireland) while being pretty much the same size and with a similar climate.

The monsoonal rainfall patterns across the tropical north are pretty much the same as in all regions in the Asian-Australian monsoon belt.

Seriously, the major cities in the Gulf States (Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE) were once pretty much nothing but sand; far more desolate than anywhere in the Northern Territory. Today they are large, vibrant economically significant cities.

Last edited by Bakery Hill; 05-17-2023 at 06:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2023, 01:16 AM
 
Location: NSW
3,798 posts, read 2,993,610 times
Reputation: 1367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakery Hill View Post
It's essentially the same reason why Tasmania has about 10% of the population of Ireland (the Republic of Ireland) while being pretty much the same size and with a similar climate.

The monsoonal rainfall patterns across the tropical north are pretty much the same as in all regions in the Asian-Australian monsoon belt.

Seriously, the major cities in the Gulf States (Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE) were once pretty much nothing but sand; far more desolate than anywhere in the Northern Territory. Today they are large, vibrant economically significant cities.
These Gulf desert states are wealthy for other reasons.
But then again so is WA, with the mining resources in the inhospitable Pilbara region.
Overall I agree with you, Australia, especially Northern Australia, can support a much bigger population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top