Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No. Dianna had a problem fitting herself in, but I think she was generally well loved by the general population. I doubt that she was considered to be a "problem child"
And why shouldn't the royal family have a few oddballs just like any other family. They are human beings, not cartoon characters.
No. Dianna had a problem fitting herself in, but I think she was generally well loved by the general population. I doubt that she was considered to be a "problem child"
Plus Diana worked really hard for the charities she supported, went on many trips in support of them. I haven't seen the Hollywood pair do that. A podcast doesn't count as hard work, imo.
She (Diana) earned respect because she worked hard. It is not automatic. I think Ms Markle thought she could get the adulation without any hard work, & when that did not happen, she threw a tantrum & left. Of course that is only my opinion, so it's worth what you paid for it
Rightly or wrongly, people accuse her of "pu$$Y whipping" Harry away from his family.
Harry is a weak and troubled person, and Markle saw this and used it to her advantage to do a smash-and-grab on the royal family. We always hear that the first thing that abusers do is separate the target of their abuse from family and friends so the target loses his/her support system and finds it harder to fight back. Markle is going right down this path with Harry, though she's alienated her whole family also. I don't know how the royal family didn't stop this marriage. There were so many red flags with this woman, even before the wedding.
And I love how these uber-feminists like Markle derive all their status and power from the men they marry. There's another well-known example of this in the US. Practice what you preach if you expect thinking people to take you seriously.
Diana was troubled but she did a lot of service and didn't seem to seek personal financial gain from all of it. Anything that Meghan does is only for the publicity and/or money that she can get from it.
It seems that in every generation of the royal family, there is that controversial “problem” child.
Does Meghan Markle fit that role in the eyes of Brits today?
No way, and she's nothing to do with the royal family.
Slanderous trouble maker, pretender, actress.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.