Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan > Detroit
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:34 PM
 
2,990 posts, read 5,276,703 times
Reputation: 2367

Advertisements

OK, give me your top 5 nice neighborhoods in Detroit with minimal exposure to blight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2013, 05:47 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,738,111 times
Reputation: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnynonos View Post
OK, give me your top 5 nice neighborhoods in Detroit with minimal exposure to blight.
Define "blight."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 05:57 PM
 
2,990 posts, read 5,276,703 times
Reputation: 2367
Ok just your top 5 neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 06:01 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,738,111 times
Reputation: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnynonos View Post
Ok just your top 5 neighborhoods.
Yeah, in Detroit (a city that has suffered from catastrophic disinvestment and has lost 2/3 of its peak population), there's an entirely different standard for blight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 06:13 PM
 
2,990 posts, read 5,276,703 times
Reputation: 2367
As far as I can tell my answer would be Palmer Woods and that whole area west of Woodward (Sherwood Forest, Green Acres), Rosedale Park, Midtown and downtown, and a few blocks adjacent to GPP, and as far as I can tell that is about it. Obviously there are streets here and there and a few developments like River Town but it seems to me the neighborhoods one could describe as even "ok" these days are nearly inifintisimle.

And let's be real, Palmer Wods might be ok but you step across Woodward and it looks like a war took place.

My point is the lady in the video has a point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 06:28 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,097 posts, read 19,697,247 times
Reputation: 25612
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarvinStrong313 View Post
So let's make sure we're clear. You're saying more than 90% of ALL blocks in Detroit city limits have severe blight? But we still manage to have 5,000 to 6,000 ppsm in the average neighborhood in Detroit . Hmmm ok suuurre
It's kind of subjective. A person who is used to very nice neighborhoods could easily see 90% or more of Detroit as severely blighted. I'd be interested in knowing what you think the percentages are. For me, although I don't live in the city, I have driven through most areas in the past few years. From my middle-income, working-class perspective (I've live my whole life in Eastpointe), I would say Detroit is:
  • 5% no blight
  • 15% minor blight
  • 20% moderate blight
  • 50% severe blight
  • 10% beyond blight categorization - urban prairie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 06:33 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,738,111 times
Reputation: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
It's kind of subjective. A person who is used to very nice neighborhoods could easily see 90% or more of Detroit as severely blighted. I'd be interested in knowing what you think the percentages are. For me, although I don't live in the city, I have driven through most areas in the past few years. From my middle-income, working-class perspective (I've live my whole life in Eastpointe), I would say Detroit is:
  • 5% no blight
  • 15% minor blight
  • 20% moderate blight
  • 50% severe blight
  • 10% beyond blight categorization - urban prairie
That sounds about right, but I'd put it more like...

30% severe blight
30% beyond blight categorization - urban prairie (much of the lower east side, areas NW of the old Tiger Stadium, area NE of Eastern Market, area in 48205).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 06:34 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,738,111 times
Reputation: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnynonos View Post
As far as I can tell my answer would be Palmer Woods and that whole area west of Woodward (Sherwood Forest, Green Acres), Rosedale Park, Midtown and downtown, and a few blocks adjacent to GPP, and as far as I can tell that is about it. Obviously there are streets here and there and a few developments like River Town but it seems to me the neighborhoods one could describe as even "ok" these days are nearly inifintisimle.

And let's be real, Palmer Wods might be ok but you step across Woodward and it looks like a war took place.

My point is the lady in the video has a point.
Well even those neighborhoods have a lot of foreclosed/vacant properties that aren't even maintained up to par (not to mention even crumbling infrastructure).

Meanwhile, downtown/midtown still has vacant properties/desolate areas too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Detroit
3,671 posts, read 5,884,130 times
Reputation: 2692
I think I read somewhere that 1/3 of Detroit's land is vacant. There is also 5,000 - 6,000 ppsm in Detroit currently. Going by these 2 facts, personal experience, and bing/google maps street view. Here's what I come up with.

Urban Prairie- nearly NOTHING. NO more than 5 occupied homes in one city block: 15%.
Severe blight- less than 50% of the block is occupied: 20%.
Moderate blight (This is what I would call the average block in Detroit)- Between 50%-80% of the block is occupied: Hmmm ill say 50%.
Minor Blight- Between 75% and 99% occupied: 10%
No blight- 100% occupied: 5%

If I had more time I could match up the areas of each category.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:53 PM
 
2,990 posts, read 5,276,703 times
Reputation: 2367
The city has lost significantly more than half it's peak population so aside from what's been razed roughly half of the living quarters are likely empty.

That doesn't count for the occupied buildings that are falling apart. Or the abandoned commercial buildings.

Some neighborhoods are clearly worse than others but any way you cut it its not a pretty picture.

I know it is an imperfect measurement as there likely were far more people living in apartment buildings back in the day, but it can't be too far off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan > Detroit
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top