Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2024, 03:53 AM
 
974 posts, read 517,163 times
Reputation: 2539

Advertisements

If you're a full on sports fan, a downtown sports arena is very convenient. If you're a more casual fan, they're a huge headache that often produces a lot of unruly thugish behavior on the streets after a game.

It's all about the money though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2024, 10:03 AM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Quote:
Originally Posted by KinBueno View Post
That stadium gets plenty of use though.
I'm surprised that they haven't fixed up the Astrodome as an entertainment complex.
They should try to get that set up before the World Cup.

Beyonce and Taylor Swift has huge concerts. They could have thrown up a screen in the Astrodome and fill that up with cheaper seats.

NRG Park is just too massive to not amp up the entertainment. The Astrodome is mere feet away from NRG stadium surely they can use it for something
1. It would cost huge amounts of money to fix up the Astrodome for any major use. It closed in 2008 with a lot of code violations. I'd assume this would require hundreds of millions (past schemes for odd uses were in the single nine figures; add escalation plus more to make the result viable).

2. It's realistically probably too late to do that before the World Cup. Just funding and basic concept agreement would take a while. Then the design/permitting. Then construction.

3. Public funding for a retrofit sounds unlikely. Owners of other venues would fight like hell. The public seems likely to oppose it in general (as they did for a scheme 11 years ago), since it's not about a team.

4. Private funding isn't plausible either. Who's going to spend hundreds of millions to add yet another competitor to a city with better stadiums, no pro sports tenants, and therefore an extremely light event load? Even if the refurb was free, operations and maintenance costs would be heavy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top