City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
17.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Marion Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Marion County: | 48 |
Ocala: | 52 |
Marion Charter School: | 17 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (352) 687-2100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 42
School number: 9670
School type: Elementary
District Name: MARION
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 687-2700
Principal: Gina Evers
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
Senate District: 3
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 80% |
State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 68% |
State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 60% |
State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 69% |
State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 56% |
State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 73% |
State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 519 |
State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 67% |
State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 46% |
State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 71% |
State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 69% |
State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 49% |
State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 69% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 80% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 571 |
State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 46% |
State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 52% |
State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 71% |
State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 51% |
State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 53% |
State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 50% |
State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 456 |
State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 54% |
State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 38% |
State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 652 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 652 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 77% |
State average from 652 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 43% |
State average from 650 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 57% |
State average from 652 schools: | 72% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 38% |
State average from 652 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 47% |
State average from 652 schools: | 67% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 43% |
State average from 652 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 431 |
State average from 652 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 652 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 60% |
State average from 655 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 655 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 643 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 643 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 53% |
State average from 643 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 56% |
State average from 643 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 643 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 57% |
State average from 643 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 361 |
State average from 643 schools: | 420 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 643 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 53% |
State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 51% |
State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 22% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 631 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 44% |
State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 27% |
State average from 631 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 631 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 43% |
State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 73% |
State average from 631 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 324 |
State average from 631 schools: | 417 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 631 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 56% |
State average from 631 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 49% |
State average from 631 schools: | 52% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1180 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 280 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1580 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 42% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1611 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 46% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1280 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 296 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 25% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1591 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1635 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 326 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 28% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 16% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 52% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1277 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1493 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 282 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1405 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1583 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1559 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 26
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1256 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1405 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1507 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1320 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1328 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 271 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1559 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 616 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPRMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 46 |
State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 625 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 652 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 20
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 215 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1139 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 273 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1442 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1450 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1343 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 107
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1577 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1579 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1531 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 48
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 271 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1165 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 271 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1401 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 287 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1407 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1343 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 64
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1572 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1576 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1493 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 605 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 34
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 632 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 52
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale ScoreMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 660 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 608 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 34
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 627 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 649 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 243 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedMARION CHARTER SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 36%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 30%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Ocala, FL
- Marion Charter School in Ocala, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: