Imagine At West Melbourne School in Melbourne, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 14.

475 S JOHN RHODES BLVD
Melbourne, FL 32904

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Wabasso School (16.2 miles):	96
New School (18.6 miles):	90
Royal Palm Charter School (8.0 miles):	84
Odyssey Charter School (9.1 miles):	53
Palm Bay Community Charter-Patriot Campus School (9.4 miles):	27
South Area Alternative Learning Center School (5.6 miles):	17
Imagine At West Melbourne School:	14
Brevard County Superintendent's Office School (13.8 miles):	1

Imagine At West Melbourne School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Brevard County:	49
Melbourne:	20
Imagine At West Melbourne School:	14

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (321) 768-6200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 5
School number: 6515
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BREVARD
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 768-6300
Principal: Shannon Gerbi
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 5 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 30
Senate District: 24
School Web Address: http://www.imagineschoolsatwestmelbourne.com

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 79 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 79 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	70%
State average from 79 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 79 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 79 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 78 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 79 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	58%
State average from 79 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	441
State average from 79 schools:	530

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 78 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	79%
State average from 80 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	70%
State average from 80 schools:	47%

Region: 3

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 312
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 280 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 74 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	43%
State average from 74 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	74%
State average from 74 schools:	87%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	25%
State average from 74 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 74 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 74 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 74 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 74 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	443
State average from 74 schools:	556

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 74 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	86%
State average from 74 schools:	47%

Minority Rate

Here:	68%
State average from 74 schools:	44%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 250 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 250 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	50%
State average from 73 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 73 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 73 schools:	81%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	21%
State average from 73 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 73 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 73 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 73 schools:	63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 73 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	464
State average from 73 schools:	537

Percent Tested

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	99%
State average from 73 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	83%
State average from 72 schools:	45%

Minority Rate

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	75%
State average from 73 schools:	43%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	54%
State average from 66 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	42%
State average from 66 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	83%
State average from 66 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	21%
State average from 66 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 66 schools:	67%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	53%
State average from 66 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	52%
State average from 66 schools:	68%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 66 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	419
State average from 66 schools:	534

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 66 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	86%
State average from 66 schools:	44%

Minority Rate

Here:	76%
State average from 66 schools:	49%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 62 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	41%
State average from 62 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 62 schools:	82%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	49%
State average from 62 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 62 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 62 schools:	65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	332
State average from 62 schools:	413

Percent Tested

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	99%
State average from 62 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	81%
State average from 62 schools:	44%

Minority Rate

Here:	69%
State average from 62 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 89
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 258
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 257
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 123
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 122
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 217
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 55 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	44%
State average from 55 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	61%
State average from 55 schools:	77%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 55 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	56%
State average from 55 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	54%
State average from 55 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	326
State average from 55 schools:	395

Percent Tested

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	99%
State average from 55 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 55 schools:	45%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 55 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1202
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	30%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1388
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	34%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	46%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	16
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1494
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	36%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1625
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1747
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	65%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1869
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	38%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	26%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	6%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	28%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1262
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	15%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1363
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	28%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	42%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1448
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	15%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	6%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	29%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	10%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	44%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1838
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	19%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	50%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	17%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1214
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	286
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1371
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1467
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1614
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1658
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	288
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1842
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	280
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1222
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1317
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1510
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	299
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1605
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1833
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 36

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1187
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1292
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1373
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1565
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1666
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1857
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	258
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1283
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1334
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1444
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1597
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1637
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1829
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	304
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	36
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	612
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	42
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	30
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	614
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	35
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	11
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	7
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	32
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	637
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	44
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	31
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	49
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	20
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	666
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	30
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	59
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 35

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	240
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 30

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	290
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1154
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1199
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	254
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1199
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1183
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 16

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1428
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1408
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1283
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 125

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1436
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1448
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1485
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -37

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	1618
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	281
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1636
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1647
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -11

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1799
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1801
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1673
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 127

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1218
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1291
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1304
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1276
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 29

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1535
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1527
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1379
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 149

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1418
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	250
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1408
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1414
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1640
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	269
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1655
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1554
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1792
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1827
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1690
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 138

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39

Mean Scale Score

Here:	602
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37

Mean Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	615
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33

Mean Scale Score

Here:	652
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25

Mean Scale Score

Here:	655
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 46
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30

Mean Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	688
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39

Mean Scale Score

Here:	612
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 52
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37

Mean Scale Score

Here:	617
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36

Mean Scale Score

IMAGINE SCHOOLS AT WEST MELBOURNE:	661
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30

Mean Scale Score

Here:	688
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 36

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	243
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 58%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 27

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	281
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT