City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
27.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Cyesis School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Sarasota County: | 48 |
Sarasota: | 43 |
Cyesis School: | 27 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (941) 361-6240 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 431
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 361-6395
Principal: Lorraine Colby
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 69
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.cyesis.org
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in MathCYESIS: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 57% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 48% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 65% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 536 |
State average from 27 schools: | 513 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateCYESIS: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 39% |
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1193 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1189 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 593
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1077
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1073
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 724 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 724 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 376
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 707
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 671
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 707
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 485 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 233
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 58% |
Meeting High Standards in MathCYESIS: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingCYESIS: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsCYESIS: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 522 |
State average from 27 schools: | 518 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 48% |
Minority RateHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 39% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1264 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1259 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 555
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1129
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 777 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 773 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 345
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 757
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 705
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 752
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 701
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 468 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 434
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 60% |
State average from 26 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 81% |
State average from 26 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 26 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 52% |
State average from 26 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 62% |
State average from 26 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 26 schools: | 75% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 43% |
State average from 26 schools: | 53% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 65% |
State average from 26 schools: | 68% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 536 |
State average from 26 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 27 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 45% |
Minority RateHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 39% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCYESIS: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCYESIS: | 1253 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4CYESIS: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5CYESIS: | 3% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1591 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3CYESIS: | 35% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 26% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17CYESIS: | 19 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1612 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CYESIS: | 303 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2CYESIS: | 15% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 45% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCYESIS: | 1987 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CYESIS: | 324 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 57% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2067 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingCYESIS: | 71% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 18% |
State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCYESIS: | 50% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 41% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCYESIS: | 43% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCYESIS: | 49% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1311 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3CYESIS: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 60% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1576 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1CYESIS: | 8% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 26% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 10% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 74% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1649 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 60% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1977 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 74% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2060 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 91% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 82% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1414 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1577 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1656 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2000 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2019 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500CYESIS: | 319 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1466 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1549 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1738 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CYESIS: | 348 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1992 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2037 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 574
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1361 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1522 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCYESIS: | 1635 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2002 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2050 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500CYESIS: | 322 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1384 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1539 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1680 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1984 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2043 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 118 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 627 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)CYESIS: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CYESIS: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreCYESIS: | 651 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 127 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreCYESIS: | 668 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CYESIS: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCYESIS: | 652 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 703 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPRCYESIS: | 71 |
State average: | 61 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CYESIS: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCYESIS: | 553 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 719 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 308 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 571
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 318 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1651 |
State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 249 |
State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1688 |
State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006CYESIS: | 1839 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -151
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 267 |
State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000CYESIS: | 1846 |
State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1886 |
State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1813 |
State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 692 |
State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 255 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 67%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 43%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Sarasota, FL
- Cyesis School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: