City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
22.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Booker High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Sarasota County: | 48 |
Sarasota: | 43 |
Booker High School: | 22 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (941) 355-2967 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 85
School type: Senior High
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 359-5757
Magnet Program.
Principal: Jill Dorsett
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.sarasota.k12.fl.us/bhs
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 44% |
State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 69% |
State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 45% |
State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 46% |
State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 42% |
State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 52% |
State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 461 |
State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 60% |
State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 57% |
State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 502 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 496 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 250
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 468
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 438
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 464
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 26% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 47% |
State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 34% |
State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 46% |
State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 38% |
State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 64% |
State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 457 |
State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 54% |
State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority RateHere: | 58% |
State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 560 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 284
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 487
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 511
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 486
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 44% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 70% |
State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 53% |
State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 47% |
State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 465 |
State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent TestedHere: | 96% |
State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 707 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 701 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 343
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 667
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 625
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 661
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 359 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 355 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 333
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 309
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 23% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 39% |
State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 65% |
State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 73% |
State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 33% |
State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 49% |
State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 38% |
State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 435 |
State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent TestedHere: | 96% |
State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 52% |
State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 841 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 836 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 417
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 794
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 791
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 362 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 192
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 349
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 348
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 255 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 405 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 402 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 386
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 37% |
State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 77% |
State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 48% |
State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 77% |
State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 44% |
State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 351 |
State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent TestedBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 97% |
State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 36% |
State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateHere: | 48% |
State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 894 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 889 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 437
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 856
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 851
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 229
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 425
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 421
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 98
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 213
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 179
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 178
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 348 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 164
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 331
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 329
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 66
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 38% |
State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in MathBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 68% |
State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 47% |
State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 365 |
State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent TestedHere: | 97% |
State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1457 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1641 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 15% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 7% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 78% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 1772 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 43% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1919 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 33% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 43% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1984 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 311 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 62% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 35% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 16% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 11% |
State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 37% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 48% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 1% |
State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 38% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1464 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 12% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1609 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 12% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 54% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 27% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 69% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1927 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1989 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 83% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 67% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1484 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1695 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1759 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1942 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1898 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 1515 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1634 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 341 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1949 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1964 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 308
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1473 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 1662 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1675 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1421 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 259 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1604 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 278 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1761 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1889 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 1893 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 315 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 257 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1436 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1562 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1677 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1472 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 263 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1676 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 278 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1804 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1907 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1966 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 106 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 641 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPRBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 68 |
State average: | 61 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 656 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 100 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 673 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 45 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 636 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 102 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 653 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPRBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 40 |
State average: | 66 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 133 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 668 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 337 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 696 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 291 |
State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 712 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Literary (max 18)BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)BOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 299 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedBOOKER HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 254 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 16%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 356
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 276 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1851 |
State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1885 |
State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1806 |
State average: | 1779 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1850 |
State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1867 |
State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1879 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -12
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1890 |
State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1909 |
State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1844 |
State average: | 1821 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 66
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1943 |
State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1950 |
State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1922 |
State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 28
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 389
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 697 |
State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 422
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 692 |
State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 388
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 708 |
State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 422
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 706 |
State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 434
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 276 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Sarasota, FL
- Booker High School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: