Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-02-2017, 09:53 PM
 
100 posts, read 81,401 times
Reputation: 178

Advertisements

Plus-size Texas woman is fired for topless photoshoot | Daily Mail Online

Quote:
plus-size woman says she has been fired from her bank job after her steamy topless photoshoot with her fiancé went viral.
Stephanie, from Texas, was widely praised for promoting body confidence after the pictures of her and her partner Arryn were shared online.
But she now says her employer has sacked her because they believed the shoot was 'inappropriate' for a 'family-oriented' company.
The bank worker, who is five months pregnant, describes herself as a 'model employee' and says the decision by Austin Bank Texas N.A to fire her was 'hurtful'.
Well, I don't know how to feel, perhaps she really should have been more careful of this kind of stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2017, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,903,213 times
Reputation: 28563
That's silly. Those photos are nearly safe for work. Who cares. How is this an issue? I wonder what would happen if a woman with a different shale had similar photos.

Rated G movies are probably more provocative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2017, 11:36 PM
 
3,437 posts, read 3,290,653 times
Reputation: 2508
the bank owners are probably conservatives (Texas bank) so the showing of too much skin is not in line with their values

or they pissed off that this employee has the chutzpa to show off her "unsexy" body
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 12:28 AM
 
10,075 posts, read 7,550,672 times
Reputation: 15501
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
That's silly. Those photos are nearly safe for work. Who cares. How is this an issue? I wonder what would happen if a woman with a different shale had similar photos.

Rated G movies are probably more provocative.
nearly safe still means unsafe...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 12:42 AM
g89
 
126 posts, read 179,807 times
Reputation: 257
Keep your private life 'private'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 07:41 AM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,308,249 times
Reputation: 28564
I'm not surprised, but I'm also not outraged. A lot of companies (in Texas or otherwise) don't view that sort of thing kindly.


Social media is not a consequence-free environment. As much as I dislike how people are judged by their employers when they're off the clock and how what they do/say can cost them their jobs, that is the unfortunate reality we're living in right now. And she knew that.


I hope she sues, though, just to see where it goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 08:27 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,279,384 times
Reputation: 57831
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
I'm not surprised, but I'm also not outraged. A lot of companies (in Texas or otherwise) don't view that sort of thing kindly.


Social media is not a consequence-free environment. As much as I dislike how people are judged by their employers when they're off the clock and how what they do/say can cost them their jobs, that is the unfortunate reality we're living in right now. And she knew that.


I hope she sues, though, just to see where it goes.
I don't see any grounds for a lawsuit, neither the overweight nor the exhibitionist is a protected class. Texas is an “employment-at-will” state so people may be fired for any reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,550,306 times
Reputation: 35512
And this is why you don't publicize your personal life with half nude shots all over the internet. It's one thing to do a photo shoot but it's another to post it publicly. You are at the mercy of what your employer deems acceptable or not. They did not find this acceptable. And sue? For what? They can fire you for anything they want that isn't a protected class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 09:04 AM
 
459 posts, read 699,817 times
Reputation: 558
I'm incredulous about this story. We only have the woman's story and since the company won't discuss personnel matter she can say anything. For all we know she sucks at her job and was fired for poor performance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 09:11 AM
 
29,524 posts, read 22,688,988 times
Reputation: 48244
https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...-positive.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top