Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2016, 08:05 AM
 
9,574 posts, read 7,455,566 times
Reputation: 14011

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Essequamvideri View Post
Does this include the number of lanes or are you just measuring linearly? How did you calculate this? I don't think you realize how little we spend on Charlotte's roads.

The department of transportation and it's regressive methodology for allocation has been traditionally dominated by anti-city good old boys. Fayetteville got an outerbelt before Charlotte. I don't think your calculation considers the amount of roadway available/# of lanes. Am I wrong?
It's the linear length on each road, at least I-485 is "free", 60% of the Raleigh beltway is going to be tolled, how would you like to have 60% of I-485 tolled!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2016, 08:07 AM
 
1,985 posts, read 2,091,917 times
Reputation: 1451
60% of 4 lanes is much smaller than 60% of 8 lanes. If you could find a way to base the comparison square footage vs. linear feet it would be much more meaningful. Raleigh has more lanes than we do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 08:21 AM
 
9,574 posts, read 7,455,566 times
Reputation: 14011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Essequamvideri View Post
60% of 4 lanes is much smaller than 60% of 8 lanes. If you could find a way to base the comparison square footage vs. linear feet it would be much more meaningful. Raleigh has more lanes than we do.
The new unbuilt part of the Raleigh beltway is going to be 3 lanes, just like the new tolled section that opened a few years ago. I think 1% of any amount of lanes you want (1 to a gazillion) is 1% more than should be tolled, but if they didn't toll it, the beltway would have taken another 20 to 30 years to complete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 10:21 AM
 
743 posts, read 835,971 times
Reputation: 345
Within the next 15-20 years Charlotte will have close to a 100 miles of toll lanes on I-77(41 miles),I-485S(18 miles)US 74(14 miles)plus the Monroe Bypass(20 miles) & it could be more if the Garden Parkway(20 miles) gets off the ground. So I guess my question is what other area of the state has any where close to this number
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 10:40 AM
 
9,574 posts, read 7,455,566 times
Reputation: 14011
Quote:
Originally Posted by js4life View Post
Within the next 15-20 years Charlotte will have close to a 100 miles of toll lanes on I-77(41 miles),I-485S(18 miles)US 74(14 miles)plus the Monroe Bypass(20 miles) & it could be more if the Garden Parkway(20 miles) gets off the ground. So I guess my question is what other area of the state has any where close to this number
Most of those express toll (HOT) lanes are going to be optional with free lanes right next to them, except for the Monroe Bypass, which is a big difference between an entire interstate like NC-540 where the only option is to not use the entire highway. There is actually talk if they ever decide to add lanes or HOV lanes on the "free" part of I-540, they will be tolled HOT lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 10:46 AM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,816 posts, read 34,944,903 times
Reputation: 10259
Quote:
Originally Posted by js4life View Post
Within the next 15-20 years Charlotte will have close to a 100 miles of toll lanes on I-77(41 miles),I-485S(18 miles)US 74(14 miles)plus the Monroe Bypass(20 miles) & it could be more if the Garden Parkway(20 miles) gets off the ground. So I guess my question is what other area of the state has any where close to this number
Hopefully, the Garden Parkway is dead since widening of I 85 is now scheduled. If NCDOT would sell the land it could go towards paying for I 85.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 12:47 PM
 
743 posts, read 835,971 times
Reputation: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
Most of those express toll (HOT) lanes are going to be optional with free lanes right next to them, except for the Monroe Bypass, which is a big difference between an entire interstate like NC-540 where the only option is to not use the entire highway. There is actually talk if they ever decide to add lanes or HOV lanes on the "free" part of I-540, they will be tolled HOT lanes.
My point is that no area in the state has as much of their transportation infrastructure upgrades tied to some form of toll revenue period& 77 isn't getting any more GP lanes so all it's new capacity are toll lanes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 01:07 PM
 
1,826 posts, read 2,517,314 times
Reputation: 1816
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
Under no circumstances would I ever say that Gaston needs I 85 widened worse than I 77 needs to be widened. McCrory changed things to give priority to urban areas. If anyone was inclined to believe that, Gastonia wins. If you go by need, I 77 wins.

GCLMPO asked for widening to the state line. When there is an accident on I 77, does traffic get diverted through Mooresville, Davidson, & Cornelius?

The only improvement that McCrory made was forcing Lincoln & Cleveland counties to finally work with Gaston. Keep in mind that by refusing to sign for the casino, McCrory has not only turned his back on money that could have gone to road improvement in this region, the Catawbas plan includes road improvement & they had surveyors out on I 85, between exits 4 & 8.

As to the Shelby bypass, they have been waiting for well over 20 years. They waited their turn & when it was ready to go, Bev let NCDOT pull that committed money for 485. The Shelby bypass was written into state commitments to a couple of companies. Every time you drive on the completed portion of 485 you are driving on the Shelby bypass & several committed projects that were pulled from Kings Mountain.
With 85 being the most important highway in the state, especially between Durham and Charlotte, I can see why the China Grove got widened before Gaston. They're going to eventually widen it all the way to the SC line but the China Grove area is several times cheaper than what the Gaston widening will cost.

As for 77 I have no qualms with sections of 85 being expanded before it since 77 is irrelevant outside of the Charlotte metro, I just take issue with the "freeways to nowhere" in the eastern and central parts of the state that were prioritized over 77 expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2016, 01:23 PM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,816 posts, read 34,944,903 times
Reputation: 10259
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeusAV View Post
With 85 being the most important highway in the state, especially between Durham and Charlotte, I can see why the China Grove got widened before Gaston. They're going to eventually widen it all the way to the SC line but the China Grove area is several times cheaper than what the Gaston widening will cost.

As for 77 I have no qualms with sections of 85 being expanded before it since 77 is irrelevant outside of the Charlotte metro, I just take issue with the "freeways to nowhere" in the eastern and central parts of the state that were prioritized over 77 expansion.
I agree that 77 should have been prioritized before the roads to nowhere. The state should have never agreed to a contract that didn't include HOT lanes capable of carrying trucks. it sounds like substandard construction to me.

The state bought land for the Garden Parkway boondoggle & used that as an excuse to not widen 85 west of Charlotte. They should sell that land & put the money towards something productive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2016, 05:58 PM
 
601 posts, read 971,894 times
Reputation: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by js4life View Post
Within the next 15-20 years Charlotte will have close to a 100 miles of toll lanes on I-77(41 miles),I-485S(18 miles)US 74(14 miles)plus the Monroe Bypass(20 miles) & it could be more if the Garden Parkway(20 miles) gets off the ground. So I guess my question is what other area of the state has any where close to this number
Give it time, but the other metros in North Carolina will likely get riddled with toll roads. I can see I-440 and I-540 in north Raleigh getting toll lanes, especially since there is a large amount of growth in those areas, and both roads are only six lanes. I-40 and I-85 Business in Greensboro are also likely candidates, and if Greensboro's outer loop is ever widened, I would bet that toll lanes will be involved. The same with I-40 and I-40 Business in Winston-Salem. I also expect I-95 to be widened with HOT lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top