Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > Blogs > Opin_Yunated
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rating: 3 votes, 3.33 average.

Most of America will be living in shanty towns in 20 years

Posted 01-28-2015 at 04:36 PM by Opin_Yunated


[QUOTE=bUU;38213072]The right-wing ethic is explicitly self-motivated. So creation of firms and jobs is not consistent with their intentions, even though they may try to claim it is. Instead, the main criteria is that the investment is likely to provide the very best possible return on investment. In context, there is nothing wrong with that. A reasonable system [I][B]could [/B][/I]be structured so that each individual within it behaves in a strictly selfish manner, like the right-wingers do, but with the system regulating each individual's activities such that every individual in the system has sufficient access to the opportunity to the resources necessary to pay one's own way and secure one's own future. If people are given license to behave in a strictly amoral manner, then it is incumbent on the system to ensure it is not exploited in an amoral manner. When the system is made to abrogate that responsibility, injustice is inevitable simply because of the nature of money and power.

The problem with the right-wing perspective is that they want to [I][B]act [/B][/I]in an amoral manner individually, [B][I]and [/I][/B]they want the system to not only allow but facilitate the injustice engendered by the amoral exploitation and callous disregard they wish to practice with impunity. A great way to see the indefensibly malevolent nature of right-wing perspective is to demand a response to the question of what should become of the least fortunate in society. The answer will either be a childish evasion ("not my problem"), begging the question ("they should get more money"), or patently immoral (various euphemisms for letting poor people live short, sickly and miserable lives).

So many people are duped by right-wing media into thinking that this is an economic matter. It isn't. It's a matter of morality. Right-wingers try to "cover" morality with references to dogma rather than the practice of compassion and caring for others. The right-wing has spent billions and billions of dollars duping weak-minded sycophants into buying into the cynical claptrap devoid of humane principles. And the right-wing plans to continue to buy elections, with plans to do so by spending billions and billions of dollars more, to promote the tens and tens of billions that the most affluent gain from such antisocial approaches.[/QUOTE]

Best post ever.
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 584 Comments 2
Total Comments 2

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    That was perfectly said....
    permalink
    Posted 01-28-2015 at 04:53 PM by ravencassidy ravencassidy is offline
  2. Old Comment
    So much sour grapes coming from a Democrat party that will be responsible for those shanty towns in 20 years. Why? Because that's exactly what they want.

    Your party lost in November because you have no solutions and operate with lies and deceit (and it showed today in the Benghazi hearings), and that post is as far from the truth as the east is from the west. I suppose your answer is raising taxes to oblivion, right?
    permalink
    Posted 01-28-2015 at 07:02 PM by case44 case44 is offline
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top