DUCK and RABBIT Dilemma of Islam and Muslims
Posted 07-29-2016 at 03:19 AM by Continuum
One cannot understand [not necessary agree] what the other is trying to show because one is ignorant of human nature and even one's own nature as a human being.
I suggested we do an exercise to establish consensus on the understanding [not agreeing] the issue I am raising.
Note this image again;
[IMG]http://www.youramazingbrain.org/images/supersenses/rabbitduckmain.jpg[/IMG]
As with the above, the Quran in words presented a DUCK-RABBIT scenario.
Generally the average humans only see one image and not the other.
Thus there are both good and evil laden elements in the Quran depending on whether one is good or evil prone. The good will see one perspective while the evil prone will see another perspective but not both.
My task is to make you understand there are both good and evil elements depending on one's perspectives.
Now what I am saying is the 80% cannot even see or read the evil laden elements in the Quran even though they are there in the Quran.
If the 80% cannot see the evil laden elements, therefore there is no question of the moderate not complying to the evil laden elements.
In this case I am not condemning the 80% to hell for doing good and are blinded to the effective evil laden elements.
Do you understand [not necessary agree] my point?
On the other hand the majority of the evil prone Muslims will perceive the evil laden elements [to them is good] and thus are inclined to act on them to please God which in reality turned out to be terrible for humanity. Because the evil prone naturally cannot perceive the good elements, one cannot blame them for not doing good.
Get my point.
[I]Note there are a small percentage who can see both good and evil but choose to do either one due to their natural inclinations, but they are small in numbers, thus I will ignore this group of people for this discussion.[/I]
The above facts are not easy to communicate and to be understood by most and worst by believers because by default they must be biased towards their own religion from their good or evil perspectives.
I am confident of my points because the facts are there, i.e. there are Muslims [from the pool of 20% evil prone] who are killing non-Muslims and even Muslims when they act upon the verses of the Quran which they deem as good and will enable them to go to Paradise expeditiously.
[IMG]http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/TROP.jpg[/IMG]
There is also the fact that the majority of Muslims perceive the verses in the Quran and their deeds do not result in terrible evils and violence.
I suggest you think deeply on the above points and not simply jump to conclusion like Simple-Simon.
Here is one example which hopefully can convey my point;
Say there is A and B looking at this image;
[IMG]http://www.youramazingbrain.org/images/supersenses/rabbitduckmain.jpg[/IMG]
A insist he see ONLY a Rabbit and nothing else.[he cannot see the Duck at all due to his psychological make-up].
B insist he see a Duck and nothing else. [he cannot see the Rabbit at all.]
Thus each is ignorant of what the other see.
Because A is so certain he see a Rabbit, A will condemn B as delusional, mad, or whatever.
Because B is so certain he sees a Duck, B will condemn A as delusional, mad, evil, or whatever.
Because each A and B are so confident of their personal perception they will continue to insist and argue for days till no end each is right and the other wrong.
If there is a monetary interest at stake in which perception is correct A or B may even kill the other.
If there is a theological salvation at stake in combination with evil laden elements, it is like one will kill the other because the psychological and emotional stake is so high.
Then comes C who can see both the DUCK and the RABBIT and told them the truth of the image.
However it is not likely A or B will believe C because A will always see a Rabbit and B will always see a DUCK and never both.
This is what happen with the 80% of Muslims and 20% of evil prone Muslims who can never perceive and understand what the other perceive with the same Quran they are reading.
This is why I stated a wise God will never allow such duality and ambiguity in terms of doctrine and moral. But unfortunately the Quran [in part] do have such a duality because it was authored by human[s] and not a wise God [if exists]. The result is untold misery, evils and violence committed by evil prone Muslims from that pool of ~20%.[QUOTE=Continuum;44936961]Post[/QUOTE]
I suggested we do an exercise to establish consensus on the understanding [not agreeing] the issue I am raising.
Note this image again;
[IMG]http://www.youramazingbrain.org/images/supersenses/rabbitduckmain.jpg[/IMG]
As with the above, the Quran in words presented a DUCK-RABBIT scenario.
Generally the average humans only see one image and not the other.
Thus there are both good and evil laden elements in the Quran depending on whether one is good or evil prone. The good will see one perspective while the evil prone will see another perspective but not both.
My task is to make you understand there are both good and evil elements depending on one's perspectives.
Now what I am saying is the 80% cannot even see or read the evil laden elements in the Quran even though they are there in the Quran.
If the 80% cannot see the evil laden elements, therefore there is no question of the moderate not complying to the evil laden elements.
In this case I am not condemning the 80% to hell for doing good and are blinded to the effective evil laden elements.
Do you understand [not necessary agree] my point?
On the other hand the majority of the evil prone Muslims will perceive the evil laden elements [to them is good] and thus are inclined to act on them to please God which in reality turned out to be terrible for humanity. Because the evil prone naturally cannot perceive the good elements, one cannot blame them for not doing good.
Get my point.
[I]Note there are a small percentage who can see both good and evil but choose to do either one due to their natural inclinations, but they are small in numbers, thus I will ignore this group of people for this discussion.[/I]
The above facts are not easy to communicate and to be understood by most and worst by believers because by default they must be biased towards their own religion from their good or evil perspectives.
I am confident of my points because the facts are there, i.e. there are Muslims [from the pool of 20% evil prone] who are killing non-Muslims and even Muslims when they act upon the verses of the Quran which they deem as good and will enable them to go to Paradise expeditiously.
[IMG]http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/TROP.jpg[/IMG]
There is also the fact that the majority of Muslims perceive the verses in the Quran and their deeds do not result in terrible evils and violence.
I suggest you think deeply on the above points and not simply jump to conclusion like Simple-Simon.
Here is one example which hopefully can convey my point;
Say there is A and B looking at this image;
[IMG]http://www.youramazingbrain.org/images/supersenses/rabbitduckmain.jpg[/IMG]
A insist he see ONLY a Rabbit and nothing else.[he cannot see the Duck at all due to his psychological make-up].
B insist he see a Duck and nothing else. [he cannot see the Rabbit at all.]
Thus each is ignorant of what the other see.
Because A is so certain he see a Rabbit, A will condemn B as delusional, mad, or whatever.
Because B is so certain he sees a Duck, B will condemn A as delusional, mad, evil, or whatever.
Because each A and B are so confident of their personal perception they will continue to insist and argue for days till no end each is right and the other wrong.
If there is a monetary interest at stake in which perception is correct A or B may even kill the other.
If there is a theological salvation at stake in combination with evil laden elements, it is like one will kill the other because the psychological and emotional stake is so high.
Then comes C who can see both the DUCK and the RABBIT and told them the truth of the image.
However it is not likely A or B will believe C because A will always see a Rabbit and B will always see a DUCK and never both.
This is what happen with the 80% of Muslims and 20% of evil prone Muslims who can never perceive and understand what the other perceive with the same Quran they are reading.
This is why I stated a wise God will never allow such duality and ambiguity in terms of doctrine and moral. But unfortunately the Quran [in part] do have such a duality because it was authored by human[s] and not a wise God [if exists]. The result is untold misery, evils and violence committed by evil prone Muslims from that pool of ~20%.[QUOTE=Continuum;44936961]Post[/QUOTE]
Total Comments 0
