Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > Blogs > Continuum
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rate this Entry

Science & God - Oil & Water

Posted 07-22-2015 at 11:25 PM by Continuum


I know with critical justifications, it is impossible for God to exists as real.
It is quite a complex justification.
Until you have understood [not necessary agree] the justification, OK it is just my conclusion.

Theism is based on faith, as such there is no way one can proof God with reason or empirical-based science.

All attempts are justifying the existence of God are false due to bad logic of equivocation which can be reduced to the following bad syllogism;

1. God do X
2. Science prove X
3. Therefore God exists

The above seem deductive but it is a very bad deduction if we take 'sense' perspective into account' i.e.

1. God does X - Transcendental
2. Science prove X - Empirical
3. Therefore God exists - Conflated transcendental with empirical

Note the deduction do not follow from the first premise to the conclusion when we look at it critically and logically when perspectives and senses are taken into consideration.

The above false modus operandi exists in the attempts in trying to prove god exists via the scientific perspective.[/quote]
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 300 Comments 0
Total Comments 0

Comments

 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top