Why do You Believe the World is only 6.000 years old?
Posted 12-09-2014 at 11:47 AM by cupper3
Remind him if he has a scientific answer after Dec 15/14 he being poorinspirit
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3
"None are so blind as those who won't see"
You are so set in your theology, you refuse to accept evidence. Please explain why you accept science when it comes to your medical care, but not otherwise?
I advised before that it is because of using the Theory of Evolution, that drugs are being developed. Don't take my word for it, let's go to non-opinion based sources:
Finding how to resist evolution in pathogens to drugs
http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journa...micro3232.html
Here is a scientific paper outlining how evolution is used in drug development. In fact, it's title is:
Evolutionary Biology and Drug Development
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/25221.pdf
A similar discussion from the University of Berkely
Resisting our drugs
And finally, a primer on Introducing evolutionary thinking for Medicine:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~nesse...thDis-2007.pdf
The last piece has a good explanation of Microevolution, macroevolution, and Development. Read it, if nothing else.
Now I know your going to come back with your macro vs micro evolution mantra. Please read at the very least the last one, and explain to us, in scientific terms, how you would counter what was laid out. In fact, I challenge you do to that with any of those papers.
I tell you what. I would appreciate an answer in the short term in the near future, however, I recognize you do not have a scientific background. Why don't you pass these articles and studies around in your fundie groups, to see if a better response than you are capable of can be given. I am going to bookmark this post, and come back to you a week from now.
It will be interesting if anything other than rote fundie nonsense will be forthcoming in your quest.
I give you facts, based on sound, scientific and replicable evidence, not opinion. See if you can do the same.
Oh, and for those transitional fossils? Why don't we look at a living critter instead.
Outline here:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...l/439534c.html
You are so set in your theology, you refuse to accept evidence. Please explain why you accept science when it comes to your medical care, but not otherwise?
I advised before that it is because of using the Theory of Evolution, that drugs are being developed. Don't take my word for it, let's go to non-opinion based sources:
Finding how to resist evolution in pathogens to drugs
http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journa...micro3232.html
Here is a scientific paper outlining how evolution is used in drug development. In fact, it's title is:
Evolutionary Biology and Drug Development
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/25221.pdf
A similar discussion from the University of Berkely
Resisting our drugs
And finally, a primer on Introducing evolutionary thinking for Medicine:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~nesse...thDis-2007.pdf
The last piece has a good explanation of Microevolution, macroevolution, and Development. Read it, if nothing else.
Now I know your going to come back with your macro vs micro evolution mantra. Please read at the very least the last one, and explain to us, in scientific terms, how you would counter what was laid out. In fact, I challenge you do to that with any of those papers.
I tell you what. I would appreciate an answer in the short term in the near future, however, I recognize you do not have a scientific background. Why don't you pass these articles and studies around in your fundie groups, to see if a better response than you are capable of can be given. I am going to bookmark this post, and come back to you a week from now.
It will be interesting if anything other than rote fundie nonsense will be forthcoming in your quest.
I give you facts, based on sound, scientific and replicable evidence, not opinion. See if you can do the same.
Oh, and for those transitional fossils? Why don't we look at a living critter instead.
Outline here:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...l/439534c.html
Total Comments 0
