New Designs Charter -Watts School in Los Angeles, CA
(06-12 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 17
- Address
- 12714 S. Avalon Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90061
- Telephone
- (323) 418-0600
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://newdesignscharter.com
- City-data.com school rating
- 17
- Students
- 438
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 8.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 400
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 6
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- Yes
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
New Designs Charter -Watts School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
New Designs Charter -Watts School: | 17 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 438
Enrollment in 2015: 365
Enrollment in 2014: 455
Enrollment in 2013: 358
Enrollment in 2011: 325
Enrollment in 2010: 236
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | G09 | G10 | G11 | G12 | Total |
---|
All students | 72 | 68 | 92 | 95 | 62 | 35 | 14 | 438 |
Female students | 28 | 26 | 46 | 48 | 32 | 20 | 6 | 206 |
Male students | 44 | 42 | 46 | 47 | 30 | 15 | 8 | 232 |
Hispanic students | 27 | 41 | 52 | 47 | 30 | 25 | 10 | 232 |
Black students | 45 | 27 | 40 | 47 | 32 | 10 | 4 | 205 |
White students | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 72
7th grade enrollment: 68
8th grade enrollment: 92
9th grade enrollment: 95
10th grade enrollment: 62
11th grade enrollment: 35
12th grade enrollment: 14
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 206 (47.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School: | 47.0% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 232 (53.0%)
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 232 (53.0%)School: | 53.0% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 205 (46.8%)New Designs Charter -Watts School: | 46.8% |
State: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 1 (0.2%)New Designs Charter -Watts School: | 0.2% |
State: | 28.3% |
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 406 (92.7%)New Designs Charter -Watts School: | 92.7% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 400 (91.3%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 6 (1.4%)
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 8
Student/Teacher RatioNew Designs Charter -Watts School: | 54.8 |
State: | 22.8 |
New Designs Charter -Watts School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All25%
- Males22%
- Females28%
- Black14%
- Hispanic35%
ELA students tested: 251
ELA students with scores: 251
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 25% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
46.2%Standard Nearly Met:
28.7%Standard Met:
21.5%Standard Exceeded:
3.6%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2468.0, Students tested: 85, Standard Not Met: 47.1%, Nearly Met: 32.9%, Met: 16.5%, Exceeded: 3.5%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2484.0, Students tested: 74, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 28.4%, Met: 21.6%, Exceeded: 4.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2492.0, Students tested: 47, Standard Not Met: 53.2%, Nearly Met: 27.7%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 2.1%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2541.8, Students tested: 45, Standard Not Met: 37.8%, Nearly Met: 22.2%, Met: 35.6%, Exceeded: 4.4%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All8%
- Males6%
- Females10%
- Black4%
- Hispanic12%
Math students tested: 251
Math students with scores: 251
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 8% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
65.7%Standard Nearly Met:
26.3%Standard Met:
6.0%Standard Exceeded:
2.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2453.4, Students tested: 84, Standard Not Met: 56.0%, Nearly Met: 29.8%, Met: 11.9%, Exceeded: 2.4%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2455.1, Students tested: 74, Standard Not Met: 58.1%, Nearly Met: 36.5%, Met: 2.7%, Exceeded: 2.7%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2432.5, Students tested: 47, Standard Not Met: 80.8%, Nearly Met: 12.8%, Met: 4.3%, Exceeded: 2.1%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2458.2, Students tested: 46, Standard Not Met: 80.4%, Nearly Met: 17.4%, Met: 2.2%, Exceeded: 0.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All21%
- Males13%
- Females32%
- Black12%
- Hispanic32%
ELA students tested: 234
ELA students with scores: 233
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 21% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
52.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
19.0%Standard Exceeded:
3.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2472.4, Students tested: 61, Standard Not Met: 51.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2459.3, Students tested: 65, Standard Not Met: 59.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2489.6, Students tested: 77, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2564.1, Students tested: 31, Standard Not Met: 32.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 35.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All9%
- Males9%
- Females11%
- Black6%
- Hispanic12%
Math students tested: 233
Math students with scores: 232
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 9% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
63.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
9.0%Standard Exceeded:
1.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2441.2, Students tested: 61, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 7.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2444.1, Students tested: 64, Standard Not Met: 56.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2452.7, Students tested: 77, Standard Not Met: 70.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.1, Students tested: 31, Standard Not Met: 71.0%, Nearly Met: 16.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All9%
- Males4%
- Females13%
- Black10%
- Hispanic7%
ELA students tested: 224
ELA students with scores: 222
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 9% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
64.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
7.0%Standard Exceeded:
1.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2437.5, Students tested: 26, Standard Not Met: 58.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2437.1, Students tested: 78, Standard Not Met: 75.0%, Nearly Met: 17.0%, Met: 6.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2459.6, Students tested: 102, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 4.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2534.4, Students tested: 18, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 44.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All4%
- Males3%
- Females6%
- Black6%
- Hispanic3%
Math students tested: 224
Math students with scores: 217
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 4% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
76.0%Standard Nearly Met:
19.0%Standard Met:
4.0%Standard Exceeded:
0.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2388.8, Students tested: 25, Standard Not Met: 78.0%, Nearly Met: 17.0%, Met: 4.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2429.3, Students tested: 79, Standard Not Met: 72.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 4.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2434.7, Students tested: 102, Standard Not Met: 82.0%, Nearly Met: 14.0%, Met: 3.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2515.6, Students tested: 18, Standard Not Met: 61.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 6.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)New Designs Charter -Watts School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,574 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
Math students tested: 11
Math students with scores: 11
Percentage Level 3: | 9% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
54.5% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
36.4% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
9.1% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 74
CST Science students with scores: 74
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 23% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
20.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
3.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 304.7, Students tested: 74, Far Below Basic: 19.0%, Below Basic: 23.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 20.0%, Advanced: 3.0%)
CST Science students tested: 44
CST Science students with scores: 44
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 30% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
30.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 319.4, Students tested: 44, Far Below Basic: 13.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 41.0%, Proficient: 30.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 102
CST Science students with scores: 102
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 18% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
21.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 290.5, Students tested: 102, Far Below Basic: 33.0%, Below Basic: 21.0%, Basic: 28.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 4.0%)
CST Science students tested: 28
CST Science students with scores: 28
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 21% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
4.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
46.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 316.7, Students tested: 28, Far Below Basic: 4.0%, Below Basic: 29.0%, Basic: 46.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 87
CST Science students with scores: 85
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 16% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
42.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
2.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 275.8, Students tested: 87, Far Below Basic: 42.0%, Below Basic: 26.0%, Basic: 16.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 2.0%)
CST Science students tested: 25
CST Science students with scores: 25
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 32% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
16.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
16.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 327.4, Students tested: 25, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 28.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 16.0%, Advanced: 16.0%) California High School Exit Exam:
(State average from 2,357 schools)
Beginning with the Class of 2006, students in California public schools were required to pass the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) to demonstrate competency in grade-level skills in reading, writing, and mathematics to earn a high school diploma. The content of the CAHSEE was based on content standards in English-language arts and mathematics that were adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE) in 2003. In 2010, the SBE adopted the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics. The CAHSEE has been repealed. Assembly Bill 830 was chaptered into law by Governor Brown on October 10, 2017. This law eliminates the CAHSEE and removes it as a condition of receiving a diploma of graduation or a condition of graduation from high school.
New Designs Charter -Watts School - California High School Exit Exam results
Math Mean Scale Score: | 367 |
California: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 72% |
California: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 36
Math Number Passed: 26
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 72% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 61% |
State: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 65% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 63% |
California: | 64% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All357
- Hispanic361
- Black346
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 357 |
California: | 370 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 63% |
California: | 68% |
ELA Number Tested: 38
ELA Number Passed: 24
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 75% |
State: | 76% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 69% |
California: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 71% |
California: | 75% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 58% |
California: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 68% |
State: | 69% |
2013-14 results for this school are based on 2 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All361
- Hispanic381
- Black358
Math Mean Scale Score: | 361 |
State: | 375 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 58% |
State: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 52
Math Number Passed: 30
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 64% |
California: | 70% |
Number Sense: | 61% |
California: | 68% |
Algebra & Functions: | 60% |
California: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 55% |
State: | 63% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All293
- Hispanic366
- Black365
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 293 |
State: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 64% |
California: | 66% |
ELA Number Tested: 47
ELA Number Passed: 30
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 62% |
State: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 59% |
State: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 57% |
California: | 73% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 54% |
State: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 56% |
California: | 70% |
Math Mean Scale Score
- All372
- Hispanic386
- Black357
Math Mean Scale Score: | 372 |
California: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 54% |
California: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 26
Math Number Passed: 14
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 72% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 66% |
State: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 65% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 59% |
State: | 62% |
Algebra 1: | 52% |
California: | 57% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All370
- Hispanic372
- Black367
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 370 |
State: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 63% |
California: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 27
ELA Number Passed: 17
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 75% |
California: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 73% |
State: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 74% |
California: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 63% |
State: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 68% |
State: | 68% |
Math Mean Scale Score: | 374 |
California: | 373 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 75% |
California: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 32
Math Number Passed: 24
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 71% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 68% |
State: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 66% |
State: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 66% |
State: | 63% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 366 |
California: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 74% |
California: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 35
ELA Number Passed: 26
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 75% |
State: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 69% |
California: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 78% |
California: | 74% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 59% |
California: | 63% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 69% |
State: | 68% |
Math Mean Scale Score: | 366 |
California: | 370 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 67% |
State: | 64% |
Math Number Tested: 24
Math Number Passed: 16
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 70% |
State: | 68% |
Number Sense: | 68% |
State: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 60% |
California: | 66% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 56% |
State: | 59% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 369 |
State: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 71% |
State: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 24
ELA Number Passed: 17
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 68% |
California: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 71% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 74% |
California: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 64% |
California: | 66% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 71% |
State: | 67% |
The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 17.5%, Needs Improvement: 80.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 1.8%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 28.6%, Needs Improvement: 61.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.6%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.8%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.6%, Needs Improvement: 22.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.2%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.5%, Needs Improvement: 3.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.4%, Needs Improvement: 1.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.4%, Needs Improvement: 52.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.3%, Needs Improvement: 12.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 23.4%, Needs Improvement: 75.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 1.6%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 34.2%, Needs Improvement: 59.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.3%, Needs Improvement: 23.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 31.3%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.7%, Needs Improvement: 18.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.6%, Needs Improvement: 34.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.8%, Needs Improvement: 34.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.4%, Needs Improvement: 1.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.4%, Needs Improvement: 6.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.6%, Needs Improvement: 23.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.9%, Needs Improvement: 46.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 64, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.9%, Needs Improvement: 53.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.9%, Needs Improvement: 42.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.2%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.2%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.0%, Needs Improvement: 27.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.7%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.9%, Needs Improvement: 26.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 19.8%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.7%, Needs Improvement: 14.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 32.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.5%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.5%, Needs Improvement: 45.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.4%, Needs Improvement: 3.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.6%, Needs Improvement: 22.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.4%, Needs Improvement: 43.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.7%, Needs Improvement: 30.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 55, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.7%, Needs Improvement: 27.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 23.5%, Needs Improvement: 72.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 4.1%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 24.4%, Needs Improvement: 73.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.6%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.1%, Needs Improvement: 31.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.4%, Needs Improvement: 27.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.0%, Needs Improvement: 60.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 99.0%, Needs Improvement: 1.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.8%, Needs Improvement: 2.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.3%, Needs Improvement: 35.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.7%, Needs Improvement: 53.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 98, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.3%, Needs Improvement: 32.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.4%, Needs Improvement: 35.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 30.3%, Needs Improvement: 63.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.5%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 28.9%, Needs Improvement: 57.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.4%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 46.1%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.4%, Needs Improvement: 2.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 50.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.5%, Needs Improvement: 35.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.6%, Needs Improvement: 47.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 36.8%, Needs Improvement: 63.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.9%, Needs Improvement: 42.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 76, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.4%, Needs Improvement: 32.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.3%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.5%, Needs Improvement: 36.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 18.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.5%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 47.7%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.5%, Needs Improvement: 6.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.2%, Needs Improvement: 50.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.7%, Needs Improvement: 33.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.5%, Needs Improvement: 61.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.5%, Needs Improvement: 48.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 65, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 33.8%, Needs Improvement: 66.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 33, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 36.4%, Needs Improvement: 63.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
New Designs Charter -Watts School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 175
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 112
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 64.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 29
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.3 |
State: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.6 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 560.4 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.0 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 74.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 576.5 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 589.5 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 608.8 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 580.0 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 27
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 618.0 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 610.0 |
California: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 604.9 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 579.8 |
State: | 537.0 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 636.5 |
State: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 618.5 |
State: | 534.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 613.8 |
California: | 515.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 566.2 |
State: | 513.2 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 626.0 |
State: | 556.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 623.7 |
State: | 555.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 601.1 |
California: | 533.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 566.5 |
State: | 530.8 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 23
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
State: | 45.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 644.5 |
State: | 575.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 642.0 |
California: | 573.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 636.3 |
California: | 550.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 576.3 |
State: | 544.5 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 82.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 654.2 |
State: | 564.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 638.9 |
State: | 567.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 678.8 |
State: | 544.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 601.8 |
California: | 532.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 433.2 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 464.2 |
California: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 533.1 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 398.6 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 561.4 |
State: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 538.0 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 557.0 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 499.3 |
California: | 541.2 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 633.9 |
State: | 543.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 595.4 |
California: | 541.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 548.1 |
California: | 524.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.5 |
State: | 521.2 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 13
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 676.5 |
State: | 565.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 592.5 |
State: | 563.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 569.6 |
California: | 541.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 539.7 |
State: | 537.7 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
State: | 45.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 680.8 |
California: | 577.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 663.4 |
State: | 577.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 593.9 |
California: | 552.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 587.8 |
California: | 546.3 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 100.0% |
State: | 43.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 710.0 |
State: | 566.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 687.6 |
State: | 570.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 666.2 |
State: | 548.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 611.6 |
California: | 536.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.3 |
California: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 551.5 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 473.0 |
California: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.5 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 24
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 591.1 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 570.4 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.4 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 529.9 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 35
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 595.0 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 571.7 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 543.4 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 557.6 |
California: | 541.5 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 548.5 |
California: | 551.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 576.1 |
California: | 549.3 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 561.1 |
California: | 530.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.8 |
State: | 536.5 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 553.4 |
California: | 571.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 587.1 |
California: | 568.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.0 |
State: | 547.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 525.9 |
State: | 549.3 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 100.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 689.3 |
State: | 585.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 649.5 |
State: | 581.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 598.7 |
California: | 559.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 622.8 |
California: | 558.0 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 83.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 715.2 |
California: | 584.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 674.7 |
California: | 579.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 700.3 |
State: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 609.5 |
California: | 552.4 |
All Grades:Student Count: 58
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 22
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.8 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 513.1 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 547.5 |
State: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.9 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 19
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 612.9 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 562.6 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 562.2 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 566.4 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 612.3 |
State: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 573.8 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
California: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 577.8 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 80
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 40
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 38
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 551.4 |
California: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 542.9 |
California: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 556.7 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.8 |
State: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 598.8 |
California: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 545.9 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 572.4 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 540.4 |
California: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 604.6 |
California: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 538.5 |
California: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 577.4 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
California: | 548.6 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 4
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 623.5 |
State: | 557.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 602.5 |
California: | 553.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 568.5 |
California: | 546.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 556.5 |
California: | 551.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 95
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 63
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 66.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 30
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 581.1 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 556.7 |
California: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 637.0 |
California: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 542.5 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 32
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 75.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 616.8 |
California: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 561.3 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 651.7 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 560.8 |
State: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 76.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 637.7 |
State: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 606.2 |
California: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 698.3 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 582.1 |
State: | 544.1 |
Grade 9:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 551.7 |
State: | 546.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 571.2 |
California: | 551.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 576.2 |
State: | 550.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
State: | 544.5 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 618.3 |
California: | 560.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 609.5 |
California: | 565.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 605.8 |
State: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 558.8 |
State: | 550.5 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
SAT/ACT:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
The ACT Test (ACT) is a nationally recognized assessment used to indicate college readiness.
The SAT Reasoning Test (SAT) is a curriculum-based, college readiness test that assesses the academic skills and knowledge students acquire in high school and the ability to apply that knowledge.
Percent of graduates taking the SAT: | 76.2% |
State: | 53.7% |
SAT scores greater or equal to 1500: | 0.0% |
California: | 38.7% |
Number of graduates: 21
Number of graduates taking the SAT: 16
Average Total SAT Score: | 1,139 |
State: | 1,426 |
Average SAT mathematics score: | 375 |
State: | 481 |
Average SAT critical reading score: | 393 |
California: | 476 |
Average SAT writing score: | 371 |
State: | 469 |
Advanced Placement:
(State average from 1,204 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
New Designs Charter -Watts School - AP exams with scores at or above criteria
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 31
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 68
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 219.0% |
California: | 94.1% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 3
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 2.4% |
California: | 46.6% |
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 14
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 30
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 214.0% |
California: | 89.5% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 6
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 9.5% |
State: | 47.4% |
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 21
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 28
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 133.0% |
California: | 90.8% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 3
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 6.0% |
State: | 47.6% |
Number of students in Grades 11 and 12: 14
Number of students taking at least one AP exam: 12
Percent of students taking at least one AP exam: | 85.0% |
California: | 83.3% |
Number of AP exams with scores at or above 3: 9
Percent of AP exams with scores at or above 3: | 42.9% |
California: | 48.7% |
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: