City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
81.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Gainesville Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Alachua County: | 36 |
Gainesville: | 34 |
This School: | 81 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (352) 955-2001 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 2771
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 334-1675
Principal: Michael Schallern
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 87% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 133 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 94% |
State average from 133 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 71% |
State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 133 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 64% |
State average from 133 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 593 |
State average from 133 schools: | 541 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 48% |
State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 41% |
State average from 133 schools: | 43% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 324 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 324 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 311
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 80% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 81% |
State average from 133 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 90% |
State average from 133 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 60% |
State average from 133 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 75% |
State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 78% |
State average from 133 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 605 |
State average from 133 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 42% |
State average from 132 schools: | 48% |
Minority RateGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 41% |
State average from 133 schools: | 42% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 77% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 82% |
State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 81% |
State average from 131 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 64% |
State average from 131 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 72% |
State average from 131 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 75% |
State average from 131 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 131 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 83% |
State average from 131 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 608 |
State average from 131 schools: | 540 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 131 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 38% |
State average from 131 schools: | 47% |
Minority RateHere: | 39% |
State average from 131 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 344 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 344 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1545 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1685 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 35% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1700 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 32% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 78% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 2 |
State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 13% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 61% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1474 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 16% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 39% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 13% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1597 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 12% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 74% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1710 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 342 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 33% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 72% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1410 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1651 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1709 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1499 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1622 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1742 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 109
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1476 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1577 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1745 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1501 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1510 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1792 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 111 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 639 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 652 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 112 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 684 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)GAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 280 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - CombinedGAINESVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 4 |
State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Gainesville, FL
- Gainesville Correctional Institution School in Gainesville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: