Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Wells Elementary School in Wells, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 7
Address
 160 RUSK AVE
Wells, TX 75976
Telephone
(936) 867-4400
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
7
Students
174
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
15.9
Free lunch eligible students
109
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
10
School district
WELLS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HUDSON MIDDLE (13.5 miles):

86
W H BONNER EL (13.3 miles):

73
HUDSON H S (13.5 miles):

72
DOUGLASS SCHOOL (12.7 miles):

65
CENTRAL J H (8.4 miles):

58
CENTRAL H S (8.4 miles):

55
CENTRAL EL (8.4 miles):

54
WELLS H S (0.0 miles):

29
Wells Elementary School:

7
Wells Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Cherokee County:

44
Wells:

18
Wells Elementary School:

7

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 174
Enrollment in 2015: 220
Enrollment in 2014: 213
Enrollment in 2013: 216
Enrollment in 2012: 227
Enrollment in 2011: 227
Enrollment in 2010: 225
Enrollment in 2009: 247
Enrollment in 2008: 248
Enrollment in 2007: 233
Enrollment in 2006: 247
Enrollment in 2005: 241
Enrollment in 2004: 243
Enrollment in 2003: 244
Enrollment in 2002: 238
Enrollment in 2001: 249
Enrollment in 2000: 230
Enrollment in 1999: 233

Wells Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G09Total
All students1718332521292191174
Female students8101417111487 - 89
Male students981981015132185
Hispanic students - 43 - 255 - - 19
Black students222412 - 2 - 15
White students1111261818221671130
Two or More Races students4123 - - - - - 10

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 17
Kindergarten enrollment: 18
1st grade enrollment: 33
2nd grade enrollment: 25
3rd grade enrollment: 21
4th grade enrollment: 29
5th grade enrollment: 21
6th grade enrollment: 9
9th grade enrollment: 1

Wells Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 89 (51.1%)
School:

51.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 85 (48.9%)
Wells Elementary School:

48.9%
State:

50.1%

Wells Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 19 (10.9%)
Here:

10.9%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 15 (8.6%)
Here:

8.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 130 (74.7%)
Wells Elementary School:

74.7%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 10 (5.7%)
Wells Elementary School:

5.7%
State:

2.1%

Wells Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 119 (68.4%)
Here:

68.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 109 (62.6%)
Here:

62.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 10 (5.7%)
School:

5.7%
Texas:

6.2%

Wells Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 15.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1.1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

10.9
Texas:

15.6

Wells Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $686,512
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 15.5 (Salary Expenditures: $476,124)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $45,673)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $118,681)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $59,202)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $160,018
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $868,858
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $487,160
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $67,174)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $118,681)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $59,202)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $240,861

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 10 (all male)
  • White: 10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

6.1%
State:

6.3%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Wells Elementary School:

8.0%
Texas:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Wells Elementary School:

28.6%
Texas:

4.3%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Here:

6.9%
Texas:

3.5%
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

22.2%
Texas:

4.1%

    Total number of students retained in 8th grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Wells Elementary School:

11.5
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,512
  • Males1,545
  • Females1,460
  • White1,521
Math Average Scale Score:

1,512
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 21
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

38%
43%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 31%)
23%
46%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,460, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
62%
38%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
37%
38%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,505
  • Males1,516
  • Females1,488
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,505
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 21
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.7 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

14%
29%
19%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 46%)
15%
23%
16%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
13%
38%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 44%)
19%
18%
19%
44%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,566
  • Males1,589
  • Females1,553
  • White1,568
Math Average Scale Score:

1,566
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 21
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 53%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

14%
53%
4%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
13%
50%
13%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 31%)
15%
54%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
17%
50%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,523
  • Females1,590
  • White1,570
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,565
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 21
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

14%
29%
28%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,523, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
25%
25%
25%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
8%
30%
31%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
17%
27%
23%
33%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,691
  • Males3,768
  • Females3,644
  • White3,680
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,691
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 21
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.1 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

38%
38%
14%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,768, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
38%
25%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,644, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 8%)
38%
47%
7%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,680, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 6%)
33%
45%
16%
6%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,534
  • Males1,506
  • Females1,578
  • White1,542
Math Average Scale Score:

1,534
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 23
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.1 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 52%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

26%
52%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
43%
43%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 0%)
24%
52%
24%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,536
  • Males1,519
  • Females1,564
  • White1,547
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,536
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 23
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

30%
35%
22%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
36%
35%
22%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
22%
34%
22%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 14%)
29%
33%
24%
14%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,762
  • Males3,700
  • Females3,859
  • White3,789
Science Average Scale Score:

3,762
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 23
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 56%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

22%
56%
9%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,700, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
29%
50%
14%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,859, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 22%)
11%
67%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,789, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 14%)
19%
57%
10%
14%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,576
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,615
  • White1,577
Math Average Scale Score:

1,576
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 21
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.2 (37%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (41%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 53%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

33%
53%
9%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 7%)
50%
43%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 71%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
71%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
35%
47%
12%
6%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,515
  • Males1,478
  • Females1,590
  • White1,528
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,515
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 21
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 52%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

38%
52%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
57%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 71%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
71%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
29%
59%
12%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 33

    Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White10
  • Multirace7
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 21 (male: 17, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 21

    Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment

  • Black2
  • White5
  • Multirace2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 9 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 5
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Black2
  • White16
  • Multirace4
  • IDEA2
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 22 (male: 12, female: 10)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

126.4
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.

Seclusion refers to the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area from which the student is physically prevented from leaving. It does not include a timeout, which is a behavior management technique that is part of an approved program, involves the monitored separation of the student in a non-locked setting, and is implemented for the purpose of calming.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Wells Elementary School:

11.5
Texas:

6.8
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to seclusion: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to seclusion per 1,000 students
Here:

11.5
State:

0.4

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • White: 5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

11.5
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
School:

11.5
State:

10.5

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Wells, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Wells main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Wells Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents