Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Rosemont Middle School in Dallas, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56
Address
 719 N MONTCLAIR AVE
Dallas, TX 75208
Telephone
(972) 749-5000
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.dallasisd.org/Page/2428
City-data.com school rating
56
Students
195
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
13.8
Free lunch eligible students
162
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
11
School district
DALLAS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WINNETKA EL (1.2 miles):

84
ROSEMONT EL (0.0 miles):

81
W E GREINER EXPLORATORY ARTS ACADEMY (0.8 miles):

77
LOUISE WOLFF KAHN EL (0.7 miles):

77
LIDA HOOE EL (0.9 miles):

72
JOHN H REAGAN EL (1.0 miles):

70
SIDNEY LANIER EXPRESSIVE ARTS VANGUARD (1.2 miles):

67
Rosemont Middle School:

56
SUNSET H S (0.5 miles):

21
Rosemont Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Dallas:

53
Rosemont Middle School:

56

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 195
Enrollment in 2015: 196
Enrollment in 2014: 127
Enrollment in 2013: 64

Rosemont Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students646665195
Female students343938111
Male students30272784
Asian students11 - 2
Hispanic students606465189
Black students1 - - 1
White students11 - 2
Two or More Races students1 - - 1

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 64
7th grade enrollment: 66
8th grade enrollment: 65

Rosemont Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 111 (56.9%)
Here:

56.9%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 84 (43.1%)
School:

43.1%
State:

50.1%

Rosemont Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 2 (1.0%)
Rosemont Middle School:

1.0%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 189 (96.9%)
Rosemont Middle School:

96.9%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 2 (1.0%)
Rosemont Middle School:

1.0%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

2.1%

Rosemont Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 173 (88.7%)
Rosemont Middle School:

88.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 162 (83.1%)
Here:

83.1%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 11 (5.6%)
School:

5.6%
State:

6.2%

Rosemont Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 13.8

Number of FTE school counselors: 0.3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.1
Texas:

15.6

Rosemont Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $599,609
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 13.8 (Salary Expenditures: $445,012)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.8 (Salary Expenditures: $28,014)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $100,049)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $208,993)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $12,790
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $646,194
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $461,542
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.1 (Salary Expenditures: $35,332)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.3 (Salary Expenditures: $81,255)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 0.8 (Salary Expenditures: $68,065)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $42,410

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 100 (male: 41, female: 59)
  • Hispanic: 100 (male: 41, female: 59)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic34
  • Asian2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP13
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 40 (male: 15, female: 25)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 11, female: 23)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 2, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Rosemont Middle School:

205.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 3,456 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,440
  • Males4,500
  • Females4,340
  • Hispanic4,449
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,440
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 16
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.2 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 63%

37%
63%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,500, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 70%)
30%
70%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,340, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 50%)
50%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,449, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 57%)
43%
57%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,658
  • Males1,681
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,658
Math Average Scale Score:

1,658
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 67
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 67

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.9 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

10%
35%
42%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,681, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 19%)
41%
40%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 9%)
20%
29%
42%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 14%)
11%
34%
41%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,610
  • Males1,619
  • Females1,601
  • Hispanic1,610
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,610
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 67
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 67

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

19%
38%
24%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 22%)
16%
34%
28%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 17%)
23%
40%
20%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 20%)
20%
36%
24%
20%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,676
  • Males1,658
  • Females1,696
  • Hispanic1,678
Math Average Scale Score:

1,676
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 46
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

17%
33%
35%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 8%)
28%
28%
36%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 24%)
5%
38%
33%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 16%)
16%
33%
35%
16%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,733
  • Males1,715
  • Females1,753
  • Hispanic1,734
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,733
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 72
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.2 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.5 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

4%
22%
24%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 41%)
8%
23%
28%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 61%)
21%
18%
61%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,734, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 49%)
4%
22%
25%
49%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,092
  • Males3,864
  • Females4,360
  • Hispanic4,034
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,092
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 72
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

10%
39%
33%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,864, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 10%)
15%
49%
26%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,360, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 27%)
3%
27%
43%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,034, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 16%)
10%
41%
33%
16%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,710
  • Males1,704
  • Females1,715
  • Hispanic1,706
Math Average Scale Score:

1,710
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 66
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

18%
30%
38%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,704, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 16%)
23%
29%
32%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 11%)
14%
32%
43%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,706, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
19%
31%
37%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,685
  • Males1,680
  • Females1,690
  • Hispanic1,682
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,685
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 56
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.6 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

14%
47%
21%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 19%)
15%
52%
14%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,690, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 17%)
14%
41%
28%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 17%)
15%
48%
20%
17%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,989
  • Males3,943
  • Females4,030
  • Hispanic3,965
Science Average Scale Score:

3,989
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 66
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

15%
38%
27%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,943, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 16%)
19%
33%
32%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,030, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 23%)
11%
43%
23%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,965, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 19%)
16%
39%
26%
19%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,609
  • Males3,692
  • Females3,531
  • Hispanic3,583
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,609
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 56
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.7 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

52%
37%
4%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,692, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 11%)
41%
44%
4%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,531, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 3%)
62%
31%
4%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,583, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 6%)
54%
37%
3%
6%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 4
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

20.5
Texas:

1.0
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of disability: 5 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

20.5
Texas:

147.9

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 35 (male: 13, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 35 (male: 13, female: 22)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
School:

100.0%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Dallas, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Rosemont Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents