Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Perfecto Mancha Elementary School in Eagle Pass, TX
(01-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72
Address
 3269 FLETCHER BLVD
Eagle Pass, TX 78852
Telephone
(830) 773-5181
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
72
Students
563
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
31.9
Free lunch eligible students
439
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
37
School district
EAGLE PASS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

72
ARMANDO CERNA EL (0.7 miles):

62
RAY H DARR EL (1.2 miles):

52
MEMORIAL J H (0.7 miles):

50
SAN LUIS ELEMENTARY (2.0 miles):

47
HENRY B GONZALEZ ELEMENTARY (1.8 miles):

42
BENAVIDES HEIGHTS EL (2.3 miles):

37
C C WINN HIGH SCHOOL (1.5 miles):

30
SAM HOUSTON ELEMENTARY (1.9 miles):

27
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Maverick County:

50
Eagle Pass:

48
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

72

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 563
Enrollment in 2015: 531
Enrollment in 2014: 484
Enrollment in 2013: 481
Enrollment in 2012: 411
Enrollment in 2011: 360

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students87118110949064563
Female students416149474233273
Male students465761474831290
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - 11 - 2
Asian students - - 1 - - 12
Hispanic students86116108928863553
Black students - 1 - - - - 1
White students - - 111 - 3
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students11 - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
1st grade enrollment: 87
2nd grade enrollment: 118
3rd grade enrollment: 110
4th grade enrollment: 94
5th grade enrollment: 90
6th grade enrollment: 64

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 273 (48.5%)
School:

48.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 290 (51.5%)
Here:

51.5%
State:

50.1%

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 553 (98.2%)
Here:

98.2%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 3 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

0.4%
Texas:

0.1%

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 476 (84.5%)
Here:

84.5%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 439 (78.0%)
School:

78.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 37 (6.6%)
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

6.6%
State:

6.2%

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 31.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 6
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 21
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

17.6
Texas:

15.6

Perfecto Mancha Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,621,787
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 35 (Salary Expenditures: $1,394,701)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $176,433)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $49,663)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $72,096)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $271,670
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,605,280
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,605,280
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 10 (Salary Expenditures: $196,699)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $49,663)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $72,096)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $591,959

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 300 (male: 164, female: 136)
  • Hispanic: 298 (male: 164, female: 134)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 52 (male: 35, female: 17)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 50 (male: 34, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 50 (male: 34, female: 16)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 50 (male: 34, female: 16)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 85 (male: 56, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 85 (male: 56, female: 29)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 23, female: 11)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in 1st grade

  • Hispanic10
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
  • 5047
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

11.5%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

3.4%
State:

4.8%

    Total number of students retained in 3rd grade

  • Hispanic7
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
  • 5044
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

6.4%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

4.3%
State:

3.6%

    Total number of students retained in 5th grade

  • Hispanic7
  • LEP4
  • IDEA5
  • 5044
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

7.8%
Texas:

4.3%

    Total number of students retained in 6th grade

  • Hispanic10
  • LEP7
  • IDEA4
  • 50410
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

15.6%
Texas:

6.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 63 (male: 34, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 61 (male: 32, female: 29)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

111.9
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,426
  • Males1,420
  • Females1,434
  • Hispanic1,425
Math Average Scale Score:

1,426
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 80
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

30%
39%
17%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,420, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 17%)
33%
36%
14%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,434, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 9%)
25%
44%
22%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,425, Tested: 79, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
30%
38%
18%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,385
  • Males1,391
  • Females1,376
  • Hispanic1,387
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,385
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 74
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

36%
41%
11%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,391, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 16%)
41%
29%
14%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,376, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 7%)
30%
57%
6%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,387, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 12%)
36%
41%
11%
12%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,314
  • Males1,248
  • Hispanic1,314
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,314
Texas:

956
Reading students tested: 8
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 8

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.6 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (39%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

63%
25%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,248, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,314, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
63%
25%
13%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,600
  • Males1,601
  • Females1,599
  • Hispanic1,599
Math Average Scale Score:

1,600
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 103
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

11%
28%
32%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 28%)
9%
31%
32%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
13%
25%
31%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 29%)
11%
29%
31%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,530
  • Males1,517
  • Females1,547
  • Hispanic1,528
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,530
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 101
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 101

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

19%
35%
22%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 19%)
19%
37%
25%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 30%)
18%
34%
18%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 99, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 23%)
19%
37%
21%
23%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,817
  • Males3,722
  • Females3,939
  • Hispanic3,797
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,817
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 100
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.6 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

32%
27%
30%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,722, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 5%)
39%
25%
31%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,939, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 18%)
23%
29%
30%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,797, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 9%)
33%
27%
31%
9%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading students tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 3

Writing students tested: 4
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 4

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,701
  • Males1,697
  • Females1,707
  • Hispanic1,702
Math Average Scale Score:

1,701
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 103
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.7 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

2%
14%
38%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,697, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 45%)
2%
9%
44%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,707, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 47%)
2%
18%
33%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 46%)
2%
13%
39%
46%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,576
  • Males1,558
  • Females1,599
  • Hispanic1,576
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,576
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 102
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

16%
28%
36%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 11%)
17%
28%
44%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 29%)
15%
27%
29%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 20%)
16%
29%
35%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,094
  • Males4,114
  • Females4,072
  • Hispanic4,092
Science Average Scale Score:

4,094
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 104
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.7 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

5%
37%
30%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,114, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 31%)
43%
26%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,072, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 24%)
10%
32%
34%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,092, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 27%)
5%
37%
31%
27%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,716
  • Males1,695
  • Females1,747
  • Hispanic1,717
Math Average Scale Score:

1,716
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 84
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.3 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

4%
26%
38%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 22%)
6%
31%
41%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,747, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 46%)
20%
34%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 33%)
4%
26%
37%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,618
  • Males1,613
  • Females1,626
  • Hispanic1,618
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,618
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 84
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

19%
33%
27%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 16%)
18%
39%
27%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 29%)
20%
26%
25%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 22%)
19%
34%
25%
22%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

3.6
State:

9.3

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic34
  • LEP22
  • IDEA7
  • 50413
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 34 (male: 20, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 20, female: 14)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

60.4
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic30
  • American Indian1
  • LEP13
  • IDEA17
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 31 (male: 24, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 30 (male: 23, female: 7)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 1 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 10, female: 3)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 17 (male: 16, female: 1)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 30

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

53.3
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 13

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

23.1
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
Perfecto Mancha Elementary School:

3.6
Texas:

5.4

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Eagle Pass, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Eagle Pass main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Perfecto Mancha Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents