Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School in Crandall, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 61
Address
 300 S MEADOWCREEK
Crandall, TX 75114
Telephone
(972) 427-6040
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
61
Students
546
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
34.5
Free lunch eligible students
223
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
19
School district
CRANDALL ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CENTRAL EL (5.1 miles):

83
HENDERSON EL (7.1 miles):

73
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

61
CRANDALL H S (0.1 miles):

54
W A MARTIN EL (0.9 miles):

45
BARBARA WALKER EL (4.6 miles):

45
CRANDALL MIDDLE (0.3 miles):

30
SEAGOVILLE EL (4.9 miles):

29
CRANDALL COMPASS ACADEMY (0.1 miles):

4
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Kaufman County:

55
Crandall:

39
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary:

61

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 546
Enrollment in 2015: 539
Enrollment in 2014: 545
Enrollment in 2013: 613
Enrollment in 2012: 523
Enrollment in 2011: 548
Enrollment in 2010: 472
Enrollment in 2009: 608
Enrollment in 2008: 554
Enrollment in 2007: 499
Enrollment in 2006: 445
Enrollment in 2005: 442
Enrollment in 2004: 465
Enrollment in 2003: 494
Enrollment in 2002: 462
Enrollment in 2001: 432
Enrollment in 2000: 410
Enrollment in 1999: 361

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students51008391909483546
Female students2434256445036273
Male students3574135464447273
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1 - 31117
Asian students - - 1 - - 214
Hispanic students - 17201713161497
Black students - 2321 - - 8
White students4805968747565425
Two or More Races students1 - - 11 - 25

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 5
Kindergarten enrollment: 100
1st grade enrollment: 83
2nd grade enrollment: 91
3rd grade enrollment: 90
4th grade enrollment: 94
5th grade enrollment: 83

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 273 (50.0%)
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

50.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 273 (50.0%)
School:

50.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 7 (1.3%)
School:

1.3%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 4 (0.7%)
Here:

0.7%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 97 (17.8%)
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

17.8%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 8 (1.5%)
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

1.5%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 425 (77.8%)
Here:

77.8%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (0.9%)
School:

0.9%
Texas:

2.1%

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 242 (44.3%)
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

44.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 223 (40.8%)
Here:

40.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 19 (3.5%)
Here:

3.5%
State:

6.2%

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 34.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 18.9

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

15.8
Texas:

15.6

Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,071,801
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 35 (Salary Expenditures: $1,599,774)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11.4 (Salary Expenditures: $257,525)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7.3 (Salary Expenditures: $391,015)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $137,412)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $75,861
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,161,947
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,660,760
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 15.4 (Salary Expenditures: $300,656)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3.3 (Salary Expenditures: $197,897)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $137,412)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $78,861

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic64
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • White4
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 72 (male: 33, female: 39)
  • Hispanic: 64 (male: 29, female: 35)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
  • White: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic4
  • White25
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 31 (male: 19, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in Kindergarten

  • Hispanic2
  • White7
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

9.0%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

2.4%
Texas:

6.1%

    Total number of students retained in 3rd grade

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

4.4%
State:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

2.4%
State:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White19
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 25 (male: 7, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 5, female: 14)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

45.8
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,452
  • Males1,467
  • Females1,438
  • Hispanic1,385
  • White1,469
Math Average Scale Score:

1,452
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 87
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 87

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

24%
38%
23%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 19%)
17%
47%
17%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,438, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 11%)
31%
29%
29%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,385, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 4%)
40%
44%
12%
4%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 18%)
18%
36%
28%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,427
  • Males1,419
  • Females1,434
  • Hispanic1,381
  • White1,442
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,427
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 87
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 87

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

26%
42%
10%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,419, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 21%)
29%
42%
8%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,434, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 22%)
24%
40%
14%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,381, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 8%)
36%
44%
12%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 27%)
25%
37%
11%
27%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,583
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,575
  • Hispanic1,580
  • White1,592
Math Average Scale Score:

1,583
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 96
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

19%
30%
26%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 27%)
18%
31%
24%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 24%)
20%
29%
27%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 13%)
8%
38%
41%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 31%)
21%
25%
23%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,543
  • Males1,552
  • Females1,534
  • Hispanic1,530
  • White1,549
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,543
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 96
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

17%
30%
32%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 20%)
16%
28%
36%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 22%)
18%
31%
29%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 13%)
13%
34%
41%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 25%)
19%
27%
29%
25%

Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,617
  • Males1,614
  • Females1,622
  • Hispanic1,609
  • White1,619
Math Average Scale Score:

1,617
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 77
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

12%
28%
41%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 22%)
11%
35%
32%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 16%)
13%
19%
52%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
20%
20%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 19%)
9%
30%
42%
19%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,612
  • Males1,599
  • Females1,631
  • Hispanic1,578
  • White1,621
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,612
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 76
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

11%
18%
35%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 31%)
13%
18%
38%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 42%)
6%
20%
32%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 33%)
20%
20%
27%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 36%)
7%
18%
39%
36%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,042
  • Males4,079
  • Females3,991
  • Hispanic3,913
  • White4,056
Science Average Scale Score:

4,042
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 79
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.6 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

14%
29%
32%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,079, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 24%)
11%
28%
37%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,991, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 27%)
18%
30%
25%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,913, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 27%)
20%
40%
13%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,056, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 24%)
12%
27%
37%
24%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,653
  • Males1,651
  • Females1,655
  • Hispanic1,643
  • White1,656
Math Average Scale Score:

1,653
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 96
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

21%
30%
30%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 16%)
16%
35%
33%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 22%)
25%
26%
27%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
31%
25%
19%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 17%)
19%
30%
34%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,583
  • Females1,626
  • Hispanic1,589
  • White1,611
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,606
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 96
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

22%
33%
26%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 11%)
24%
36%
29%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 25%)
20%
31%
24%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
19%
43%
25%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 20%)
23%
29%
28%
20%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Nola Kathryn Wilson Elementary School:

3.7
State:

9.3

Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Here:

3.7
Texas:

5.7


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,090 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

3.7
Texas:

159.6

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 5 (all male)

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

16.5
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 7 (all male)
  • Black: 3
  • White: 4
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

1.8
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 15 (male: 11, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

3.7
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Crandall, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents