Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Ned E Williams Elementary School in Longview, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 83
Address
 5230 ESTES PKWY
Longview, TX 75603
Telephone
(903) 803-5500
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
83
Students
558
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
34.6
Free lunch eligible students
473
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
19
School district
LONGVIEW ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HUDSON EL (5.1 miles):

100
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

83
FOSTER MIDDLE (5.2 miles):

67
SOUTH WARD EL (5.8 miles):

50
DAN CHADWICK CAMPUS (8.2 miles):

42
WARE EL (6.0 miles):

33
FOREST PARK MAGNET SCHOOL (8.1 miles):

33
PINE TREE MIDDLE (8.4 miles):

15
LEAD ACADEMY H S (7.0 miles):

9
Ned E Williams Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Gregg County:

54
Longview:

52
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

83

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 558
Enrollment in 2015: 582
Enrollment in 2014: 529
Enrollment in 2013: 558
Enrollment in 2012: 575
Enrollment in 2011: 618

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students64947899826972558
Female students23403342403533246
Male students41544557423439312
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 21 - 2 - 16
Asian students - - - - 1 - 12
Hispanic students25443936322426226
Black students29382550413836257
White students853765640
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - 1 - 1
Two or More Races students25106 - 1226

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 64
Kindergarten enrollment: 94
1st grade enrollment: 78
2nd grade enrollment: 99
3rd grade enrollment: 82
4th grade enrollment: 69
5th grade enrollment: 72

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 246 (44.1%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

44.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 312 (55.9%)
School:

55.9%
State:

50.1%

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 6 (1.1%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

1.1%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

0.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 226 (40.5%)
Here:

40.5%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 257 (46.1%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

46.1%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 40 (7.2%)
School:

7.2%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
School:

0.2%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 26 (4.7%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

4.7%
Texas:

2.1%

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 492 (88.2%)
Here:

88.2%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 473 (84.8%)
Here:

84.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 19 (3.4%)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

3.4%
State:

6.2%

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 34.6

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 8
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.1
Texas:

15.6

Ned E Williams Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $8,116,393
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 34.6 (Salary Expenditures: $8,116,393)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6.9 (Salary Expenditures: $108,381)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $88,416)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $90,568)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $7,723,552
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $9,837,012
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $9,434,200
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11.9 (Salary Expenditures: $166,958)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $145,286)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $90,568)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $9,329,474

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic145
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • White2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 151 (male: 79, female: 72)
  • Hispanic: 145 (male: 77, female: 68)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic11
  • Black23
  • White4
  • Multirace4
  • LEP8
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 42 (male: 31, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Black: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic16
  • Black22
  • White4
  • Multirace4
  • LEP13
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Black: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

4.3%
Texas:

5.2%

    Total number of students retained in 1st grade

  • Hispanic4
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP4
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

10.3%
State:

6.1%

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic7
  • Black7
  • White2
  • LEP4
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 16 (male: 9, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

16.2%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

2.4%
State:

4.1%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,484
  • Males1,466
  • Females1,510
  • Hispanic1,531
  • Black1,453
Math Average Scale Score:

1,484
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 74
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

16%
33%
33%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 16%)
18%
37%
29%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
13%
27%
40%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,531, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
7%
31%
31%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,453, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 11%)
24%
31%
34%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,414
  • Males1,403
  • Females1,431
  • Hispanic1,444
  • Black1,384
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,414
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 69
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

26%
42%
15%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 19%)
33%
36%
12%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 15%)
15%
52%
18%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 25%)
25%
29%
21%
25%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,384, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 11%)
32%
50%
7%
11%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Reading Average Scale Score:

1,417
Texas:

956
Reading students tested: 7
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
14%
43%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,417, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
29%
14%
43%
14%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,629
  • Males1,647
  • Females1,618
  • Hispanic1,618
  • Black1,618
  • White1,736
  • Multirace1,641
Math Average Scale Score:

1,629
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 75
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 75

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

8%
23%
33%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 45%)
10%
28%
17%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 30%)
7%
19%
44%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 28%)
10%
28%
34%
28%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 37%)
9%
22%
32%
37%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,736, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,560
  • Males1,559
  • Females1,560
  • Hispanic1,522
  • Black1,576
  • White1,637
  • Multirace1,572
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,560
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 75
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 75

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

11%
32%
29%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 24%)
10%
24%
42%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
11%
37%
22%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 28%)
21%
41%
10%
28%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 26%)
6%
25%
43%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,860
  • Males3,810
  • Females3,892
  • Hispanic3,892
  • Black3,834
  • White4,024
  • Multirace3,656
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,860
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 75
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 75

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

21%
32%
39%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,810, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 3%)
21%
34%
42%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,892, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 11%)
22%
30%
37%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,892, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 7%)
10%
40%
43%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,834, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 9%)
26%
30%
35%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,024, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 17%)
17%
16%
50%
17%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,656, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,656
  • Males1,640
  • Females1,674
  • Hispanic1,679
  • Black1,644
Math Average Scale Score:

1,656
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 73
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

12%
21%
35%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 28%)
13%
23%
36%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 35%)
12%
17%
36%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 32%)
5%
16%
47%
32%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 31%)
14%
25%
30%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,591
  • Males1,581
  • Females1,603
  • Hispanic1,626
  • Black1,576
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,591
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 73
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

18%
20%
36%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 21%)
21%
23%
35%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
15%
17%
36%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 63%, Masters: 21%)
16%
63%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 27%)
24%
25%
24%
27%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,127
  • Males4,165
  • Females4,084
  • Hispanic4,206
  • Black4,133
Science Average Scale Score:

4,127
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 71
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 71

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.5 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 44%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

4%
28%
44%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,165, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
5%
24%
42%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,084, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 18%)
3%
33%
46%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,206, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 24%)
35%
41%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,133, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 28%)
4%
24%
44%
28%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic10
  • Black19
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA5
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 38 (male: 23, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

68.1
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black13
  • White6
  • LEP1
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 21 (male: 20, female: 1)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 13 (male: 12, female: 1)
  • White: 6 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 9

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Ned E Williams Elementary School:

16.1
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

    Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black7
  • White2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Longview, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents