Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School in Arlington, TX
(KG-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 43
Address
 6101 S COLLINS ST
Arlington, TX 76018
Telephone
(972) 304-1155
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
43
Students
239
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
16.7
Free lunch eligible students
137
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
26
School district
MANARA ACADEMY
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
FITZGERALD EL (1.0 miles):

79
BRYANT EL (1.1 miles):

74
BECKHAM EL (0.6 miles):

62
IMOGENE GIDEON EL (1.3 miles):

61
OUSLEY J H (0.6 miles):

53
BEBENSEE EL (1.1 miles):

51
BARNETT J H (0.9 miles):

49
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

43
SEGUIN H S (1.3 miles):

39
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Tarrant County:

54
Arlington:

48
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington:

43

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 239
Enrollment in 2015: 155

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students424343424029239
Female students222223192517128
Male students202120231512111
Asian students42426321
Hispanic students45333 - 18
Black students14111415141078
White students182421191715114
Two or More Races students2113 - 18

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 42
1st grade enrollment: 43
2nd grade enrollment: 43
3rd grade enrollment: 42
4th grade enrollment: 40
5th grade enrollment: 29

Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 128 (53.6%)
Here:

53.6%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 111 (46.4%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

46.4%
State:

50.1%

Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 21 (8.8%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

8.8%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 18 (7.5%)
Here:

7.5%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 78 (32.6%)
School:

32.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 114 (47.7%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

47.7%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 8 (3.3%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

3.3%
State:

2.1%

Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 163 (68.2%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

68.2%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 137 (57.3%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

57.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 26 (10.9%)
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

10.9%
State:

6.2%

Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 16.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

14.3
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $743,852
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 17 (Salary Expenditures: $743,852)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $87,716)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $45,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $118,808)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $251,544
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $743,852
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $87,716)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $45,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $118,808)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,550,004

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Asian4
  • Black16
  • White52
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 74 (male: 36, female: 38)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • White: 52 (male: 29, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (all male)
  • Black: 4
  • White: 4

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,025 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Here:

13.8%
State:

4.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,417
  • Males1,403
  • Females1,430
  • Black1,339
  • White1,463
Math Average Scale Score:

1,417
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 27
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.1 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

37%
37%
11%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
46%
23%
16%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 14%)
29%
50%
7%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,339, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 8%)
67%
25%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 10%)
20%
40%
30%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,384
  • Males1,363
  • Females1,403
  • Black1,325
  • White1,379
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,384
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 27
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

41%
33%
11%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,363, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 15%)
46%
39%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
36%
28%
22%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,325, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 8%)
58%
34%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,379, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 10%)
40%
30%
20%
10%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,433
  • Males1,448
  • Females1,418
  • Asian1,467
  • Black1,425
  • White1,444
Math Average Scale Score:

1,433
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 37
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.6 (40%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 5%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

59%
33%
5%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,448, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 5%)
53%
31%
11%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,418, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
50%
33%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,425, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 7%)
67%
20%
6%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,455
  • Males1,432
  • Females1,479
  • Asian1,545
  • Black1,410
  • White1,496
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,455
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 37
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

49%
13%
19%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,432, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 21%)
53%
15%
11%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 17%)
44%
12%
27%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,410, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
53%
20%
20%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
42%
8%
25%
25%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,514
  • Males3,417
  • Females3,618
  • Asian3,768
  • Black3,275
  • White3,803
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,514
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 37
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

57%
19%
13%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,417, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 5%)
58%
21%
16%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,618, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 17%)
56%
16%
11%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,768, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
50%
17%
16%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,275, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 7%)
73%
20%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,803, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
42%
16%
25%
17%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,495
  • Males1,476
  • Females1,510
  • Black1,467
  • White1,488
Math Average Scale Score:

1,495
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 32
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.8 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.1 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.7 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.8 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

59%
22%
13%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 81%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 6%)
81%
13%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
40%
40%
13%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 75%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 8%)
75%
8%
9%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
60%
27%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,521
  • Males1,468
  • Females1,569
  • Black1,517
  • White1,502
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,521
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 32
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

44%
15%
28%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,468, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 75%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 6%)
75%
19%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 20%)
13%
34%
33%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 17%)
50%
25%
8%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 7%)
47%
13%
33%
7%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,492
  • Males3,459
  • Females3,531
  • Black3,524
  • White3,403
Science Average Scale Score:

3,492
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 32
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.8 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

50%
41%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,459, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
59%
29%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,531, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
40%
53%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,524, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
42%
50%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,403, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
67%
26%
7%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,604
  • Males1,606
  • Females1,603
  • Black1,583
  • White1,596
Math Average Scale Score:

1,604
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 30
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (38%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

20%
43%
24%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
23%
39%
23%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 12%)
18%
47%
23%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
17%
58%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 10%)
30%
30%
30%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,638
  • Males1,609
  • Females1,660
  • Black1,585
  • White1,638
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,638
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 30
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

20%
30%
23%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
23%
39%
23%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 35%)
18%
23%
24%
35%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 8%)
33%
34%
25%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,651
  • Males1,599
  • Females1,677
  • Black1,631
  • White1,680
Math Average Scale Score:

1,651
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 18
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 18

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

28%
44%
11%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
50%
17%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 10%)
10%
60%
20%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,663
  • Males1,527
  • Females1,731
  • Black1,555
  • White1,713
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,663
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 18
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 18

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

22%
28%
22%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,527, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 42%)
25%
33%
42%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
67%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,713, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
40%
30%
30%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,827
  • Males3,293
  • Females4,094
  • Black3,470
  • White3,959
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,827
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 18
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 18

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.2 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 56%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

28%
16%
56%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,293, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
67%
16%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,094, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 75%, Masters: 0%)
8%
17%
75%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,470, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
50%
17%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,959, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 0%)
20%
20%
60%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived race, color or national origin. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin constitutes racial harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin per 1,000 students
Manara Stem Academy - Arlington School:

4.2
Texas:

1.3
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2



Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Asian4
  • Black4
  • White16
  • Multirace4
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

117.2
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Asian1
  • Black6
  • White14
  • LEP12
  • IDEA2
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 21 (male: 16, female: 5)
  • Asian: 1 (all male)
  • Black: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • White: 14 (male: 11, female: 3)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 12 (male: 10, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 6

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

25.1
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

    Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White10
  • LEP7
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 16 (male: 12, female: 4)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Arlington, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents