Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Magnolia Montessori For All School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 40
Address
 5100 PECAN BROOK DR
Austin, TX 78724
Telephone
(512) 522-2429
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
40
Students
332
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
21.9
Free lunch eligible students
118
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
34
School district
MONTESSORI FOR ALL
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
COMMISSIONER O (#000002)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
LASA H S (0.3 miles):

99
JORDAN EL (1.3 miles):

74
PECAN SPRINGS EL (1.5 miles):

63
Magnolia Montessori For All School:

40
WINN EL (0.5 miles):

31
GARCIA YMLA (1.1 miles):

26
ANDREWS EL (1.3 miles):

22
LBJ HIGH SCHOOL (0.3 miles):

17
TEXAS PREPARATORY SCHOOL - AUSTIN CAMPUS (1.0 miles):

12
Magnolia Montessori For All School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
Magnolia Montessori For All:

40

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 332
Enrollment in 2015: 276

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04Total
All students964746514547332
Female students533224292025183
Male students431522222522149
Asian students4 - 1 - 117
Hispanic students401315251726136
Black students116374334
White students372626162214141
Two or More Races students42131314

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 96
Kindergarten enrollment: 47
1st grade enrollment: 46
2nd grade enrollment: 51
3rd grade enrollment: 45
4th grade enrollment: 47

Magnolia Montessori For All School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 183 (55.1%)
Here:

55.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 149 (44.9%)
School:

44.9%
Texas:

50.1%

Magnolia Montessori For All School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 7 (2.1%)
Magnolia Montessori For All School:

2.1%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 136 (41.0%)
School:

41.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 34 (10.2%)
School:

10.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 141 (42.5%)
Here:

42.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 14 (4.2%)
School:

4.2%
State:

2.1%

Magnolia Montessori For All School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 152 (45.8%)
School:

45.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 118 (35.5%)
Here:

35.5%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 34 (10.2%)
School:

10.2%
Texas:

6.2%

Magnolia Montessori For All School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 21.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

15.2
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $588,000
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 16 (Salary Expenditures: $588,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 14 (Salary Expenditures: $210,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.5 (Salary Expenditures: $22,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $315,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $5,000
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $48,000
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $50,000
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $48,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $5,000

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 96 (male: 41, female: 55)
  • Hispanic: 94 (male: 41, female: 53)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic14
  • Black4
  • White14
  • LEP7
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 21, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,429 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Magnolia Montessori For All School:

4.3%
Texas:

5.2%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,460
  • Males1,449
  • Females1,467
  • Hispanic1,403
  • White1,502
Math Average Scale Score:

1,460
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 58
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

24%
29%
31%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,449, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 8%)
24%
32%
36%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 21%)
24%
28%
27%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 16%)
40%
24%
20%
16%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 18%)
14%
32%
36%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,463
  • Males1,433
  • Females1,486
  • Hispanic1,403
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,463
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 58
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

17%
35%
20%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,433, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 20%)
20%
44%
16%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
15%
27%
25%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 20%)
32%
36%
12%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 36%)
7%
36%
21%
36%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,526
  • Males1,541
  • Females1,515
  • Hispanic1,502
  • Black1,558
  • White1,575
Math Average Scale Score:

1,526
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

31%
38%
15%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
29%
33%
19%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 14%)
32%
43%
11%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 14%)
39%
40%
7%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
20%
20%
30%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,521
  • Males1,532
  • Females1,513
  • Hispanic1,477
  • Black1,544
  • White1,643
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,521
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

31%
22%
23%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 29%)
33%
15%
23%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
29%
28%
22%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
43%
28%
15%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
17%
16%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,629
  • Males3,715
  • Females3,565
  • Hispanic3,395
  • Black4,091
  • White4,010
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,629
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 49
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

41%
20%
33%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,715, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 5%)
38%
19%
38%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,565, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 7%)
43%
21%
29%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,395, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 4%)
61%
21%
14%
4%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,091, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 66%, Masters: 17%)
17%
66%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,010, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 10%)
10%
20%
60%
10%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,566
  • Males1,564
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,519
  • White1,618
Math Average Scale Score:

1,566
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 44
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

25%
45%
21%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 10%)
24%
43%
23%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 9%)
26%
48%
17%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 0%)
37%
47%
16%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 21%)
11%
52%
16%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,587
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,515
  • White1,659
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,587
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 44
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

16%
32%
29%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 33%)
19%
29%
19%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 13%)
13%
35%
39%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
26%
53%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 47%)
5%
16%
32%
47%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,780
  • Males3,704
  • Females3,845
  • Hispanic3,410
  • White4,196
Science Average Scale Score:

3,780
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 43
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

33%
34%
12%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,704, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 20%)
30%
45%
5%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,845, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
35%
26%
17%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,410, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 0%)
53%
42%
5%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,196, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 44%)
11%
28%
17%
44%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,564
  • Females1,608
  • Hispanic1,587
  • Black1,529
  • White1,623
Math Average Scale Score:

1,585
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 39
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.8 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (42%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

36%
31%
30%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
40%
30%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 5%)
32%
31%
32%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 4%)
40%
24%
32%
4%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
62%
38%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,566
  • Males1,551
  • Females1,582
  • Hispanic1,549
  • Black1,552
  • White1,652
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,566
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

33%
23%
39%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 5%)
40%
20%
35%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 5%)
26%
27%
42%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 4%)
44%
16%
36%
4%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 62%, Masters: 13%)
25%
62%
13%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents