All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Panaca, NV
Lincoln County High School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
Lincoln County High School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
45 .
Address:
Principal: Marty Soderborg
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 728-4481
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 728-4484
Website: www.lincoln.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lincoln County High School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Panaca:
52Lincoln County High School:
45
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
97.6%White:
97.1%
Percent Proficient White:
71.9%All Students:
69.2%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
97.6%White:
97.1%
Percent Proficient White:
93.9%All Students:
93.8%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
91.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
88.2%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grade 11
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Lincoln County High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -3.8%State : 1.3%
Male
This School : -18.0%Nevada : 1.0%
White
This School : -1.6%Nevada : 11.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -15.0%State : -9.7%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 -3.8% 1.3% 0.0% 1.1% 32.5% 26.3% 60.0% 54.4% 7.5% 18.2%
Male 16 -18.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.2% 46.7% 26.6% 46.7% 52.9% 6.7% 19.4%
Female 26 4.7% 1.7% 0.0% 1.0% 24.0% 26.1% 68.0% 56.0% 8.0% 17.0%
White 35 -1.6% 11.6% 0.0% 0.5% 30.3% 16.6% 60.6% 57.7% 9.1% 25.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 -15.0% -9.7% 0.0% 1.5% 43.8% 36.9% 50.0% 51.5% 6.3% 10.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 -0.2% 0.6% 2.6% 2.7% 26.3% 25.4% 60.5% 54.5% 10.5% 17.4%
Male 18 -2.5% 1.5% 6.3% 3.3% 25.0% 23.9% 56.3% 53.8% 12.5% 19.1%
Female 22 1.4% -0.4% 0.0% 2.2% 27.3% 26.9% 63.6% 55.2% 9.1% 15.7%
White 38 1.7% 11.0% 2.7% 1.5% 24.3% 16.1% 62.2% 58.4% 10.8% 23.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -7.7% -11.1% 9.1% 4.4% 27.3% 35.5% 54.5% 50.8% 9.1% 9.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 63 -0.6% 8.6% 6.5% 3.8% 32.3% 25.7% 38.7% 51.4% 22.6% 19.0%
Male 35 -3.0% 10.4% 2.9% 4.1% 38.2% 23.6% 32.4% 51.1% 26.5% 21.1%
Female 28 2.4% 6.8% 10.7% 3.5% 25.0% 27.8% 46.4% 51.7% 17.9% 17.0%
White 59 -0.9% 17.7% 6.8% 2.3% 32.2% 18.1% 39.0% 54.2% 22.0% 25.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -26.9% -4.4% 15.0% 6.6% 50.0% 35.9% 25.0% 48.0% 10.0% 9.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 12.4% 9.7% 2.9% 4.3% 22.9% 24.1% 57.1% 52.9% 17.1% 18.6%
Male 21 3.1% 11.9% 5.0% 4.4% 30.0% 21.8% 45.0% 53.0% 20.0% 20.8%
Female 15 24.8% 7.4% 0.0% 4.3% 13.3% 26.4% 73.3% 52.9% 13.3% 16.4%
White 32 15.5% 19.5% 3.2% 2.5% 19.4% 16.1% 58.1% 56.9% 19.4% 24.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 13.1% -5.3% 0.0% 8.1% 25.0% 35.3% 58.3% 47.5% 16.7% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 46 9.9% 11.8% 0.0% 4.0% 37.8% 32.0% 53.3% 47.4% 8.9% 16.7%
Male 27 13.1% 15.6% 0.0% 4.4% 34.6% 27.7% 53.8% 48.2% 11.5% 19.7%
Female 19 5.6% 8.0% 0.0% 3.6% 42.1% 36.1% 52.6% 46.5% 5.3% 13.8%
White 41 7.7% 22.1% 0.0% 2.2% 40.0% 23.4% 50.0% 52.5% 10.0% 21.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 14.4% -5.9% 0.0% 7.6% 33.3% 46.0% 61.1% 39.4% 5.6% 7.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 45 11.3% 19.8% 4.5% 4.4% 31.8% 23.5% 54.5% 58.0% 9.1% 14.1%
Male 18 18.3% 22.7% 5.9% 5.0% 23.5% 20.1% 64.7% 58.3% 5.9% 16.6%
Female 27 7.0% 17.0% 3.7% 3.8% 37.0% 26.9% 48.1% 57.7% 11.1% 11.6%
White 43 12.0% 29.1% 2.4% 2.4% 33.3% 16.2% 54.8% 63.3% 9.5% 18.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -2.3% 3.1% 7.1% 8.7% 42.9% 35.8% 42.9% 49.3% 7.1% 6.1%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 34 31.6% 11.2% 9.7% 10.1% 6.5% 26.4% 64.5% 50.0% 19.4% 13.5%
Male 19 31.9% 12.0% 10.5% 11.1% 5.3% 24.6% 63.2% 49.2% 21.1% 15.1%
Female 14 31.0% 10.4% 8.3% 9.1% 8.3% 28.2% 66.7% 50.9% 16.7% 11.8%
White 25 34.1% 23.5% 4.5% 5.7% 9.1% 18.5% 63.6% 57.1% 22.7% 18.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 17.7% -9.7% 20.0% 16.4% 10.0% 41.0% 60.0% 39.0% 10.0% 3.6%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 51 18.0% 14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 39.2% 42.3% 60.8% 57.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Male 27 23.9% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 40.5% 66.7% 59.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Female 24 11.4% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0% 45.8% 44.3% 54.2% 55.7% 0.0% 0.0%
White 44 23.1% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 34.1% 30.9% 65.9% 69.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 -2.8% -1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 59.0% 40.0% 41.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grade 11 Students Tested: 42
Lincoln County High School:
97.6%Nevada:
99.4%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Approaches Standard This School:
2.4%Nevada:
5.0%
Exceeds Standard This School:
51.2%State:
47.2%
Lincoln County High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
10.9%Nevada:
7.7%
Female This School:
9.5%State:
9.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students This School:
7.4%Nevada:
4.5%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 10.9% 7.7% 0.0% 0.6% 2.4% 5.0% 46.3% 47.2% 51.2% 47.2%
Male 16 13.3% 6.1% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 6.4% 66.7% 48.6% 33.3% 44.2%
Female 26 9.5% 9.4% 0.0% 0.5% 3.9% 3.4% 34.6% 45.7% 61.5% 50.4%
White 35 10.4% 10.7% 0.0% 0.4% 2.9% 2.2% 41.2% 36.2% 55.9% 61.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 7.4% 4.5% 0.0% 0.9% 5.9% 7.9% 47.1% 57.3% 47.1% 33.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 13.3% 7.3% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 5.4% 64.9% 44.5% 35.1% 49.5%
Male 18 13.3% 6.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 6.4% 66.7% 45.1% 33.3% 47.6%
Female 22 13.3% 8.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 4.3% 63.6% 44.0% 36.4% 51.3%
White 38 13.3% 10.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 2.6% 63.9% 33.9% 36.1% 63.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 13.3% 3.2% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 9.1% 60.0% 55.3% 40.0% 34.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 63 9.3% 11.3% 0.0% 1.2% 8.3% 5.1% 40.0% 41.4% 51.7% 52.2%
Male 35 8.6% 9.8% 0.0% 1.7% 9.1% 6.2% 39.4% 42.4% 51.5% 49.7%
Female 28 10.3% 12.8% 0.0% 0.8% 7.4% 4.2% 40.7% 40.4% 51.9% 54.7%
White 59 8.9% 13.9% 0.0% 0.7% 8.8% 3.0% 38.6% 32.0% 52.6% 64.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 1.9% 6.5% 0.0% 2.2% 15.8% 9.0% 52.6% 53.0% 31.6% 35.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 14.8% 11.0% 2.9% 1.6% 0.0% 5.1% 45.7% 46.2% 51.4% 47.1%
Male 21 12.7% 10.0% 5.0% 1.8% 0.0% 5.8% 50.0% 47.4% 45.0% 44.9%
Female 15 17.7% 12.1% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 4.3% 40.0% 45.1% 60.0% 49.3%
White 32 14.4% 14.4% 3.2% 0.8% 0.0% 2.5% 45.2% 37.4% 51.6% 59.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 17.7% 4.3% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 10.0% 41.7% 57.3% 58.3% 29.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 46 19.8% 13.0% 0.0% 1.7% 2.3% 7.4% 47.7% 42.4% 50.0% 48.5%
Male 27 22.1% 11.9% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 8.0% 52.0% 43.6% 48.0% 46.2%
Female 19 16.8% 14.0% 0.0% 1.3% 5.3% 6.8% 42.1% 41.3% 52.6% 50.7%
White 41 22.1% 17.2% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 3.9% 48.7% 35.0% 51.3% 60.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 16.5% 4.1% 0.0% 3.6% 5.6% 14.4% 55.6% 52.8% 38.9% 29.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 45 10.7% 11.9% 0.0% 1.8% 11.4% 8.5% 38.6% 46.3% 50.0% 43.5%
Male 18 10.3% 10.2% 0.0% 2.4% 11.8% 9.4% 23.5% 46.2% 64.7% 41.9%
Female 27 11.0% 13.5% 0.0% 1.1% 11.1% 7.5% 48.1% 46.3% 40.7% 45.1%
White 43 12.6% 16.6% 0.0% 1.0% 9.5% 4.6% 40.5% 40.0% 50.0% 54.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -4.6% 2.4% 0.0% 3.8% 26.7% 16.0% 33.3% 56.7% 40.0% 23.6%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 34 15.6% 4.9% 3.2% 5.1% 3.2% 12.1% 45.2% 42.3% 48.4% 40.5%
Male 19 16.5% 2.2% 5.6% 6.5% 0.0% 13.3% 44.4% 41.8% 50.0% 38.3%
Female 14 14.4% 7.6% 0.0% 3.6% 7.7% 10.9% 46.2% 42.8% 46.2% 42.7%
White 25 13.4% 12.8% 4.3% 2.5% 4.3% 6.8% 43.5% 37.4% 47.8% 53.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 22.1% -6.1% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 20.8% 44.4% 51.8% 55.6% 20.0%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 51 14.7% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.8% 22.8% 88.2% 77.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Male 27 15.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 26.0% 88.9% 74.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Female 24 14.0% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 19.6% 87.5% 80.4% 0.0% 0.0%
White 44 17.4% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 13.9% 90.9% 86.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 6.5% -10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 36.5% 80.0% 63.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Science Grade 11 Students Tested: 42
This School:
95.2%Nevada:
98.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
2.5%Nevada:
8.7%
Exceeds Standard This School:
10.0%Nevada:
6.8%
Lincoln County High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
Here : -13.4%State : -13.6%
Female
This School : -6.7%Nevada : -17.8%
White
This School : -4.9%Nevada : -2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -17.9%Nevada : -27.7%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 -9.2% -15.7% 2.5% 8.7% 20.0% 20.3% 67.5% 64.3% 10.0% 6.8%
Male 16 -13.4% -13.6% 6.7% 9.2% 20.0% 17.7% 66.7% 64.1% 6.7% 9.1%
Female 26 -6.7% -17.8% 0.0% 8.1% 20.0% 23.0% 68.0% 64.5% 12.0% 4.4%
White 35 -4.9% -2.5% 0.0% 3.8% 18.2% 12.0% 69.7% 73.4% 12.1% 10.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 -17.9% -27.7% 6.3% 13.4% 25.0% 27.6% 50.0% 55.9% 18.8% 3.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 2.8% -8.3% 5.3% 6.8% 5.3% 14.8% 68.4% 61.6% 21.1% 16.8%
Male 18 0.8% -6.0% 6.3% 7.1% 6.3% 12.1% 62.5% 59.0% 25.0% 21.7%
Female 22 4.2% -10.7% 4.5% 6.4% 4.5% 17.6% 72.7% 64.2% 18.2% 11.9%
White 38 2.5% 2.5% 5.4% 2.9% 5.4% 7.9% 67.6% 64.3% 21.6% 24.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -4.9% -19.7% 9.1% 11.5% 9.1% 21.5% 63.6% 58.3% 18.2% 8.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 63 2.9% -6.6% 4.9% 7.5% 9.8% 16.8% 63.9% 59.8% 21.3% 15.9%
Male 35 5.5% -3.5% 3.0% 7.5% 9.1% 13.6% 63.6% 58.0% 24.2% 20.9%
Female 28 -0.2% -9.7% 7.1% 7.6% 10.7% 19.8% 64.3% 61.6% 17.9% 11.0%
White 59 2.2% 3.6% 5.2% 3.8% 10.3% 10.2% 63.8% 63.2% 20.7% 22.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -12.3% -20.9% 10.0% 13.3% 20.0% 25.2% 60.0% 54.2% 10.0% 7.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
High School Proficiency Examination Writing Grade 11 Students Tested: 41
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
97.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
95.1%State:
76.4%
Lincoln County High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 41 8.4% -8.0% 0.0% 1.2% 4.9% 20.1% 95.1% 76.4% 0.0% 2.3%
Male 15 0.0% -13.7% 0.0% 1.9% 13.3% 25.2% 86.7% 71.2% 0.0% 1.8%
White 34 10.4% 0.9% 0.0% 0.6% 2.9% 11.8% 97.1% 84.1% 0.0% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 7.4% -17.5% 0.0% 2.0% 5.9% 28.9% 94.1% 68.3% 0.0% 0.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 0.8% -1.5% 5.0% 1.8% 7.5% 13.0% 87.5% 82.3% 0.0% 2.9%
Male 18 -14.5% -5.9% 11.1% 2.4% 16.7% 16.8% 72.2% 78.7% 0.0% 2.1%
White 38 2.8% 4.7% 2.6% 1.3% 7.9% 7.4% 89.5% 87.3% 0.0% 4.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -11.7% -9.6% 8.3% 2.8% 16.7% 20.2% 75.0% 76.0% 0.0% 1.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 63 6.6% 5.1% 1.6% 0.9% 9.5% 11.7% 88.9% 83.1% 0.0% 4.4%
Male 35 0.5% 1.2% 2.9% 1.3% 14.3% 15.1% 82.9% 80.3% 0.0% 3.3%
Female 28 14.1% 9.0% 0.0% 0.4% 3.6% 8.2% 96.4% 85.8% 0.0% 5.5%
White 59 7.5% 10.2% 1.7% 0.4% 8.5% 7.0% 89.8% 86.9% 0.0% 5.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -6.1% -3.2% 4.8% 1.6% 19.0% 19.3% 76.2% 77.2% 0.0% 1.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 9.1% 5.3% 2.9% 3.0% 5.7% 9.5% 85.7% 81.4% 5.7% 6.2%
Male 21 7.7% 2.1% 5.0% 3.6% 5.0% 11.9% 90.0% 79.9% 0.0% 4.5%
Female 15 11.0% 8.4% 0.0% 2.3% 6.7% 7.0% 80.0% 82.9% 13.3% 7.9%
White 32 8.0% 10.4% 3.2% 2.1% 6.5% 5.2% 83.9% 84.3% 6.5% 8.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 17.7% -3.9% 0.0% 4.9% 0.0% 16.7% 91.7% 75.9% 8.3% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 46 15.4% 13.1% 2.2% 0.9% 4.4% 8.0% 93.3% 80.7% 0.0% 10.4%
Male 27 14.7% 10.8% 3.7% 1.2% 3.7% 10.1% 92.6% 80.8% 0.0% 7.9%
Female 19 16.5% 15.4% 0.0% 0.7% 5.6% 6.0% 94.4% 80.5% 0.0% 12.7%
White 41 17.1% 17.5% 2.5% 0.5% 2.5% 4.1% 95.0% 82.6% 0.0% 12.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 16.5% 4.0% 0.0% 2.1% 5.6% 16.0% 94.4% 77.3% 0.0% 4.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Language Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 62 28.3% 33.4% 31.7% 26.5% 28.3% 22.8% 11.7% 17.2%
Male 34 32.4% 40.9% 41.2% 25.9% 17.6% 19.7% 8.8% 13.5%
Female 28 23.1% 25.8% 19.2% 27.2% 42.3% 26.1% 15.4% 21.0%
White 58 28.6% 23.4% 32.1% 25.3% 26.8% 27.2% 12.5% 24.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 50.0% 46.7% 36.4% 28.2% 13.6% 17.3% 0.0% 7.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 25.0% 33.9% 30.6% 26.0% 30.6% 22.4% 13.9% 17.7%
Male 23 40.9% 47.2% 27.3% 28.1% 22.7% 16.5% 9.1% 8.2%
Female 14 0.0% 26.1% 35.7% 26.5% 42.9% 25.5% 21.4% 21.9%
White 33 28.1% 24.7% 31.3% 24.6% 28.1% 26.5% 12.5% 24.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 21.4% 46.5% 35.7% 28.2% 35.7% 17.2% 7.1% 8.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 10.4% 33.9% 37.5% 26.1% 39.6% 22.2% 12.5% 17.7%
Male 27 11.5% 41.3% 42.3% 25.4% 42.3% 19.3% 3.8% 13.9%
Female 22 9.1% 26.3% 31.8% 26.8% 36.4% 25.2% 22.7% 21.6%
White 42 7.3% 24.5% 36.6% 25.6% 41.5% 26.3% 14.6% 23.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 10.0% 48.4% 55.0% 28.3% 30.0% 15.9% 5.0% 7.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 21.4% 34.5% 31.0% 25.5% 33.3% 21.8% 14.3% 18.2%
Male 17 31.3% 42.4% 43.8% 25.0% 18.8% 18.7% 6.3% 13.9%
Female 26 15.4% 26.3% 23.1% 26.1% 42.3% 25.0% 19.2% 22.6%
White 41 20.0% 24.9% 32.5% 25.1% 35.0% 25.7% 12.5% 24.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 33.3% 50.0% 33.3% 27.9% 16.7% 15.7% 16.7% 6.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 13.6% 33.9% 27.3% 24.7% 45.5% 24.5% 13.6% 16.9%
Male 26 15.4% 41.7% 34.6% 24.7% 42.3% 20.8% 7.7% 12.8%
Female 18 11.1% 25.7% 16.7% 24.7% 50.0% 28.4% 22.2% 21.2%
White 38 13.2% 24.9% 28.9% 23.6% 42.1% 29.0% 15.8% 22.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 23.5% 49.0% 35.3% 28.4% 41.2% 16.7% 0.0% 5.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Mathematics Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 62 28.3% 35.8% 16.7% 26.0% 36.7% 21.4% 18.3% 16.8%
Male 34 31.3% 37.2% 18.8% 23.2% 28.1% 20.9% 21.9% 18.7%
Female 28 25.0% 34.3% 14.3% 28.9% 46.4% 22.1% 14.3% 14.8%
White 58 30.4% 25.2% 14.3% 24.7% 37.5% 26.1% 17.9% 24.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 36.4% 49.1% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 15.9% 9.1% 7.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 25.0% 34.6% 36.1% 25.9% 19.4% 21.7% 19.4% 17.9%
Male 23 36.4% 47.2% 40.9% 28.2% 4.5% 16.9% 18.2% 7.7%
Female 14 7.1% 33.1% 28.6% 28.0% 42.9% 22.7% 21.4% 16.3%
White 33 28.1% 24.9% 31.3% 24.2% 21.9% 26.1% 18.8% 24.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 28.6% 46.0% 42.9% 28.2% 21.4% 17.3% 7.1% 8.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 16.7% 34.4% 33.3% 26.4% 29.2% 21.6% 20.8% 17.6%
Male 27 15.4% 35.9% 30.8% 23.6% 30.8% 20.7% 23.1% 19.8%
Female 22 18.2% 32.8% 36.4% 29.3% 27.3% 22.5% 18.2% 15.4%
White 42 14.6% 24.7% 36.6% 25.0% 24.4% 25.9% 24.4% 24.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 25.0% 47.9% 35.0% 28.7% 30.0% 16.4% 10.0% 7.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 36.6% 35.2% 22.0% 26.5% 26.8% 21.0% 14.6% 17.3%
Male 17 50.0% 37.5% 12.5% 23.8% 12.5% 19.6% 25.0% 19.1%
Female 26 28.0% 32.7% 28.0% 29.3% 36.0% 22.4% 8.0% 15.5%
White 41 33.3% 25.4% 23.1% 25.4% 28.2% 25.3% 15.4% 23.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 41.7% 48.9% 25.0% 28.8% 33.3% 15.4% 0.0% 6.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 22.7% 36.5% 11.4% 24.9% 40.9% 20.6% 25.0% 18.0%
Male 26 15.4% 39.2% 11.5% 22.3% 46.2% 19.1% 26.9% 19.4%
Female 18 33.3% 33.6% 11.1% 27.7% 33.3% 22.1% 22.2% 16.6%
White 38 23.7% 27.2% 13.2% 24.0% 36.8% 24.7% 26.3% 24.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 41.2% 49.4% 5.9% 26.9% 41.2% 16.5% 11.8% 7.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Reading Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 62 14.8% 31.7% 24.6% 27.3% 34.4% 21.6% 26.2% 19.5%
Male 34 14.7% 34.2% 26.5% 25.8% 32.4% 20.7% 26.5% 19.3%
Female 28 14.8% 29.1% 22.2% 28.8% 37.0% 22.4% 25.9% 19.7%
White 58 15.8% 18.0% 22.8% 25.2% 33.3% 27.2% 28.1% 29.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 27.3% 47.3% 27.3% 28.5% 22.7% 15.6% 22.7% 8.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 13.9% 32.3% 38.9% 26.6% 25.0% 21.2% 22.2% 19.9%
Male 23 22.7% 50.3% 40.9% 27.8% 13.6% 14.2% 22.7% 7.7%
Female 14 0.0% 29.9% 35.7% 27.6% 42.9% 22.2% 21.4% 20.3%
White 33 15.6% 19.4% 37.5% 24.8% 25.0% 26.4% 21.9% 29.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 21.4% 47.3% 35.7% 28.6% 28.6% 15.3% 14.3% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 14.3% 32.9% 26.5% 26.4% 30.6% 21.4% 28.6% 19.3%
Male 27 11.1% 35.1% 22.2% 25.1% 33.3% 20.1% 33.3% 19.6%
Female 22 18.2% 30.5% 31.8% 27.7% 27.3% 22.7% 22.7% 19.1%
White 42 11.9% 19.2% 26.2% 25.9% 28.6% 26.5% 33.3% 28.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 20.0% 50.4% 25.0% 28.0% 25.0% 14.0% 30.0% 7.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 19.0% 33.4% 33.3% 25.9% 26.2% 21.1% 21.4% 19.6%
Male 17 18.8% 36.7% 25.0% 24.5% 31.3% 19.9% 25.0% 18.9%
Female 26 19.2% 30.0% 38.5% 27.3% 23.1% 22.4% 19.2% 20.3%
White 41 17.5% 20.4% 32.5% 24.6% 27.5% 26.5% 22.5% 28.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 33.3% 52.1% 16.7% 27.8% 25.0% 12.8% 25.0% 7.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 18.2% 35.2% 27.3% 24.3% 38.6% 21.2% 15.9% 19.3%
Male 26 11.5% 38.5% 30.8% 23.2% 46.2% 19.7% 11.5% 18.6%
Female 18 27.8% 31.6% 22.2% 25.6% 27.8% 22.7% 22.2% 20.1%
White 38 18.4% 23.2% 28.9% 23.4% 36.8% 26.1% 15.8% 27.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 35.3% 51.0% 23.5% 25.5% 41.2% 15.1% 0.0% 8.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Science Detailed Students Results Percent of Lincoln County High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 62 9.7% 33.0% 29.0% 26.9% 40.3% 22.7% 21.0% 17.4%
Male 34 11.8% 35.5% 32.4% 26.6% 41.2% 20.7% 14.7% 17.2%
Female 28 7.1% 30.3% 25.0% 27.2% 39.3% 24.8% 28.6% 17.7%
White 58 10.3% 22.8% 29.3% 24.1% 37.9% 26.8% 22.4% 26.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 17.4% 43.9% 34.8% 30.1% 43.5% 18.0% 4.3% 7.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 11.1% 33.6% 38.9% 26.4% 22.2% 21.8% 27.8% 18.2%
Male 23 13.6% 45.8% 54.5% 30.0% 18.2% 17.1% 13.6% 7.1%
Female 14 7.1% 31.3% 14.3% 26.5% 28.6% 24.0% 50.0% 18.3%
White 33 12.5% 23.7% 37.5% 23.9% 18.8% 25.8% 31.3% 26.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 14.3% 44.6% 42.9% 29.7% 14.3% 17.2% 28.6% 8.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 8.2% 32.7% 16.3% 26.2% 38.8% 22.7% 36.7% 18.3%
Male 27 3.7% 35.3% 18.5% 25.8% 37.0% 20.4% 40.7% 18.6%
Female 22 13.6% 30.1% 13.6% 26.7% 40.9% 25.2% 31.8% 18.1%
White 42 7.1% 23.4% 14.3% 24.1% 42.9% 26.3% 35.7% 26.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 5.0% 45.2% 15.0% 29.6% 40.0% 17.6% 40.0% 7.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 22.5% 33.3% 22.5% 26.1% 37.5% 22.4% 17.5% 18.2%
Male 17 26.7% 36.9% 20.0% 25.2% 40.0% 20.0% 13.3% 17.9%
Female 26 20.0% 29.5% 24.0% 27.1% 36.0% 24.8% 20.0% 18.6%
White 41 21.1% 23.8% 21.1% 23.7% 39.5% 26.3% 18.4% 26.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 25.0% 45.3% 33.3% 30.3% 25.0% 17.2% 16.7% 7.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 25.0% 35.1% 20.5% 25.3% 36.4% 22.9% 18.2% 16.7%
Male 26 23.1% 38.8% 23.1% 24.9% 38.5% 20.3% 15.4% 16.0%
Female 18 27.8% 31.3% 16.7% 25.7% 33.3% 25.5% 22.2% 17.5%
White 38 28.9% 26.4% 18.4% 23.5% 34.2% 26.7% 18.4% 23.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 35.3% 43.5% 41.2% 30.1% 23.5% 17.6% 0.0% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Panaca, NV
Lincoln County High School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: