Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Lauro Cavazos Elementary School in Odessa, TX
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46
Address
 9301 W 16TH ST
Odessa, TX 79763
Telephone
(432) 456-1309
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
46
Students
667
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
42.1
Free lunch eligible students
386
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
61
School district
ECTOR COUNTY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
ODESSA CAREER AND TECHNICAL EARLY COLLEGE H S (4.9 miles):

73
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

46
MURRY FLY EL (3.0 miles):

43
NOEL EL (4.9 miles):

39
CAMERON DUAL LANGUAGE MAGNET (4.9 miles):

30
PEASE EL (4.8 miles):

23
EDWARD K DOWNING EL (1.8 miles):

20
CROCKETT MIDDLE (4.7 miles):

17
G E 'BUDDY' WEST EL (1.1 miles):

16
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Ector County:

35
Odessa:

35
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

46

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 667
Enrollment in 2015: 845
Enrollment in 2014: 820
Enrollment in 2013: 848
Enrollment in 2012: 877
Enrollment in 2011: 870
Enrollment in 2010: 779
Enrollment in 2009: 818
Enrollment in 2008: 745
Enrollment in 2007: 739
Enrollment in 2006: 721
Enrollment in 2005: 737
Enrollment in 2004: 727
Enrollment in 2003: 715
Enrollment in 2002: 725
Enrollment in 2001: 760
Enrollment in 2000: 766
Enrollment in 1999: 840

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students112612111189106113667
Female students1546265454653326
Male students - 725946446060341
Hispanic students111310097749897580
Black students - - - - 2114
White students - 1320141271480
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - 1 - 1 - - 2
Two or More Races students - - - - - - 11

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 1
Kindergarten enrollment: 126
1st grade enrollment: 121
2nd grade enrollment: 111
3rd grade enrollment: 89
4th grade enrollment: 106
5th grade enrollment: 113

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 326 (48.9%)
School:

48.9%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 341 (51.1%)
Here:

51.1%
Texas:

50.1%

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 580 (87.0%)
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

87.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
School:

0.6%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 80 (12.0%)
Here:

12.0%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Here:

0.3%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

0.1%
State:

2.1%

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 447 (67.0%)
Here:

67.0%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 386 (57.9%)
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

57.9%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 61 (9.1%)
School:

9.1%
State:

6.2%

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 42.1

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2.9
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 3
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.1
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

15.9
Texas:

15.6

Lauro Cavazos Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,519,284
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 46 (Salary Expenditures: $2,068,422)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $13,447)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7.7 (Salary Expenditures: $286,843)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $150,571)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $134,000
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,818,024
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,250,313
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4.7 (Salary Expenditures: $43,714)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 14.1 (Salary Expenditures: $373,426)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $150,571)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $186,752

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 257 (male: 130, female: 127)
  • Hispanic: 253 (male: 128, female: 125)
  • Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 11 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 51 (male: 35, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 47 (male: 31, female: 16)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

3.2%
State:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 7 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

5.8%
State:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

3.6%
Texas:

4.8%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 29 (male: 16, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 8, female: 8)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

43.5
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,403
  • Males1,405
  • Females1,399
  • Hispanic1,393
  • White1,436
Math Average Scale Score:

1,403
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 87
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

38%
38%
13%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 12%)
39%
34%
15%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,399, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 11%)
37%
42%
10%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,393, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 10%)
40%
38%
12%
10%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,436, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 16%)
32%
36%
16%
16%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,366
  • Males1,364
  • Females1,370
  • Hispanic1,361
  • White1,385
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,366
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 87
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 88

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.6 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

38%
41%
13%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,364, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 8%)
39%
41%
12%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,370, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 8%)
37%
42%
13%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,361, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
41%
38%
14%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,385, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 11%)
26%
53%
10%
11%
3rd Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,408
  • Males1,389
  • Females1,430
  • Hispanic1,403
Math Average Scale Score:

1,408
Texas:

510
Math students tested: 41
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.1 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 7%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

37%
41%
7%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,389, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 18%)
50%
32%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 11%)
21%
53%
15%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 13%)
38%
43%
7%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,400
  • Males1,366
  • Females1,439
  • Hispanic1,399
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,400
State:

956
Reading students tested: 41
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

27%
36%
15%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,366, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 14%)
32%
41%
13%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,439, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 32%)
21%
32%
15%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,399, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 23%)
28%
38%
12%
23%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,492
  • Males1,515
  • Females1,475
  • Hispanic1,491
  • White1,487
Math Average Scale Score:

1,492
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 102
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.8 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

43%
35%
12%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
41%
27%
18%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,475, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 7%)
45%
41%
7%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 9%)
44%
35%
12%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 13%)
44%
37%
6%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,455
  • Males1,464
  • Females1,448
  • Hispanic1,448
  • White1,482
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,455
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 103
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

49%
26%
15%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,464, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 16%)
42%
25%
17%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,448, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 5%)
53%
28%
14%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,448, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 9%)
49%
29%
13%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,482, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 6%)
50%
12%
32%
6%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,424
  • Males3,460
  • Females3,397
  • Hispanic3,404
  • White3,513
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,424
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 103
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (37%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.5 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 1%

60%
25%
14%
1%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,460, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 0%)
55%
29%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,397, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 2%)
64%
22%
12%
2%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,404, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 1%)
65%
20%
14%
1%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,513, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
38%
50%
13%
4th Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,428
  • Males1,369
  • Females1,492
  • Hispanic1,428
Math Average Scale Score:

1,428
Texas:

381
Math students tested: 19
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

53%
31%
11%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,369, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
80%
10%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
22%
56%
11%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,428, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 5%)
53%
31%
11%
5%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,421
  • Males1,399
  • Females1,442
  • Hispanic1,421
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,421
State:

815
Reading students tested: 18
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 18

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 6%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

39%
44%
6%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,399, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 11%)
56%
33%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
22%
56%
11%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,421, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 11%)
39%
44%
6%
11%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,303
  • Males3,003
  • Females3,669
  • Hispanic3,303
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,303
Texas:

2,017
Writing students tested: 20
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (37%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.9 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

70%
10%
10%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,003, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 82%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
82%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,669, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
56%
22%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,303, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
70%
10%
10%
10%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,586
  • Females1,585
  • Hispanic1,585
  • White1,581
Math Average Scale Score:

1,585
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 106
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.1 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

20%
38%
27%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 13%)
20%
38%
29%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 18%)
20%
37%
25%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 95, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 17%)
20%
37%
26%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,528
  • Males1,526
  • Females1,529
  • Hispanic1,521
  • White1,579
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,528
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 105
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 107

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

37%
24%
26%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 11%)
33%
29%
27%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 16%)
42%
18%
24%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
39%
23%
25%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,749
  • Males3,805
  • Females3,689
  • Hispanic3,733
  • White3,936
Science Average Scale Score:

3,749
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 107
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 107

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

33%
34%
19%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,805, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 18%)
29%
31%
22%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,689, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 10%)
37%
38%
15%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,733, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 13%)
32%
38%
17%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,936, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
30%
10%
30%
30%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math Average Scale Score:

1,503
Texas:

298
Math students tested: 6
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 6

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2 (33%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.7 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

50%
33%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
50%
33%
17%
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,637
State:

683
Reading students tested: 7
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 43%

14%
15%
28%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
14%
15%
28%
43%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,439
  • Males3,391
  • Hispanic3,439
Science Average Scale Score:

3,439
State:

857
Science students tested: 7
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.3 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

57%
43%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,391, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,439, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
57%
43%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 1
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic70
  • White19
  • LEP25
  • IDEA10
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 89 (male: 37, female: 52)
  • Hispanic: 70 (male: 26, female: 44)
  • White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 11, female: 14)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

133.4
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

3.0
Texas:

5.4

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (male: 4, female: 1)
  • Hispanic: 5 (male: 4, female: 1)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all female)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Lauro Cavazos Elementary School:

4.5
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Odessa, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Odessa main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Lauro Cavazos Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents