All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Las Vegas, NV
James Cashman Middle School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
James Cashman Middle School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
27 .
Address:
Principal: Misti L. Taton
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-5880
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-5947
Website: schools.ccsd.net
Title I School: Yes
AYP School Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 1 - Hold)
Special Programs: Homework Help Centers: Yes
Other nearby schools ratings:
James Cashman Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Clark County:
41Las Vegas:
39James Cashman Middle School:
27
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Asian:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.9%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
99.8%Hispanic:
99.8%Limited English Proficiency Students:
99.8%
Percent Proficient White:
92.8%Asian:
91.7%Two or more Races:
86.7%All Students:
73.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
67.5%Black:
67.1%Hispanic:
65.2%Limited English Proficiency Students:
61.8%Individual Education Plan Students:
36.3%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Asian:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.9%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
99.9%Hispanic:
99.9%Limited English Proficiency Students:
99.9%
Percent Proficient Asian:
87.5%White:
84.6%Two or more Races:
75.8%All Students:
61.8%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
55.0%Hispanic:
52.7%Black:
52.5%Limited English Proficiency Students:
45.5%Individual Education Plan Students:
20.6%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Asian:
97.4%Two or more Races:
96.0%White:
94.5%All Students:
94.4%Hispanic:
94.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
94.1%Pacific Islander:
94.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
92.9%Individual Education Plan Students:
92.4%Black:
92.3%American Indian:
90.9%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
38.6%State:
36.5%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 307 -6.6% -3.0% 4.3% 2.7% 38.6% 36.5% 56.9% 59.1% 0.3% 1.7%
Male 183 -8.3% -12.8% 4.4% 4.0% 40.1% 45.0% 55.0% 50.2% 0.6% 0.8%
Female 124 -4.1% 7.1% 4.0% 1.4% 36.3% 27.8% 59.7% 68.3% 0.0% 2.6%
Asian 27 25.1% 14.4% 0.0% 1.0% 11.1% 20.9% 88.9% 73.8% 0.0% 4.4%
Hispanic 186 -18.9% -15.7% 4.9% 3.9% 50.3% 48.0% 44.9% 47.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Black 19 -16.4% -16.3% 5.3% 4.4% 47.4% 48.0% 47.4% 46.9% 0.0% 0.7%
White 57 15.1% 7.3% 1.8% 1.6% 19.3% 27.3% 77.2% 68.6% 1.8% 2.5%
Two or more Races 15 16.2% 8.6% 13.3% 1.7% 6.7% 25.9% 80.0% 70.3% 0.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 111 -36.5% -42.0% 8.2% 8.7% 64.6% 69.5% 27.3% 21.7% 0.0% 0.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 236 -15.3% -15.2% 5.5% 4.2% 46.0% 47.3% 48.5% 48.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 340 -10.6% -6.9% 5.0% 5.1% 41.8% 38.0% 45.6% 48.1% 7.6% 8.8%
Male 175 -12.9% -15.7% 5.7% 7.5% 43.4% 44.4% 42.9% 42.3% 8.0% 5.8%
Female 165 -8.0% 2.3% 4.2% 2.6% 40.0% 31.3% 48.5% 54.1% 7.3% 12.0%
Asian 30 6.2% 8.3% 3.3% 2.6% 26.7% 25.3% 43.3% 53.3% 26.7% 18.8%
Hispanic 240 -18.8% -18.5% 6.3% 6.9% 48.8% 47.8% 41.7% 41.4% 3.3% 3.9%
Black 32 4.9% -18.5% 0.0% 8.0% 31.3% 46.7% 59.4% 39.5% 9.4% 5.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 117 -39.0% -51.3% 10.3% 20.7% 65.0% 66.8% 23.9% 12.4% 0.9% 0.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 254 -12.2% -18.2% 3.9% 7.5% 44.5% 46.9% 45.3% 41.3% 6.3% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 -4.6% -1.3% 10.1% 5.7% 36.6% 37.7% 47.3% 47.3% 6.1% 9.4%
Male 172 -8.0% -9.6% 12.8% 8.0% 37.2% 43.7% 47.1% 42.1% 2.9% 6.2%
Female 156 -0.9% 7.1% 7.1% 3.3% 35.9% 31.6% 47.4% 52.6% 9.6% 12.6%
Asian 22 28.4% 13.7% 0.0% 2.5% 13.6% 25.8% 63.6% 54.2% 22.7% 17.4%
Hispanic 245 -7.0% -13.7% 11.0% 8.6% 38.0% 47.1% 46.1% 39.9% 4.9% 4.4%
Black 30 -8.0% -11.8% 6.7% 8.7% 43.3% 45.1% 50.0% 41.0% 0.0% 5.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -34.0% -42.8% 40.0% 26.3% 36.0% 58.6% 24.0% 14.5% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 114 -30.8% -44.7% 23.7% 24.6% 49.1% 62.1% 26.3% 12.9% 0.9% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 254 -3.7% -14.0% 11.0% 8.9% 34.6% 47.1% 48.8% 39.8% 5.5% 4.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 283 -4.6% -2.1% 8.5% 6.2% 38.2% 37.8% 45.6% 46.1% 7.8% 9.8%
Male 161 -8.9% -10.7% 9.3% 8.8% 41.6% 44.0% 42.9% 40.8% 6.2% 6.5%
Female 121 1.5% 7.3% 6.6% 3.5% 33.9% 31.2% 49.6% 52.0% 9.9% 13.3%
Asian 24 4.5% 11.5% 0.0% 3.5% 37.5% 27.1% 37.5% 51.2% 25.0% 18.3%
Hispanic 212 -4.7% -15.4% 7.5% 9.9% 39.2% 47.4% 47.2% 38.2% 6.1% 4.4%
Black 24 -8.0% -11.9% 20.8% 8.1% 29.2% 45.9% 41.7% 40.6% 8.3% 5.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 30 -54.7% -40.7% 33.3% 26.1% 63.3% 56.6% 3.3% 16.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 97 -35.3% -44.5% 14.4% 25.8% 62.9% 60.7% 21.6% 13.1% 1.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 283 -4.6% -15.3% 8.5% 9.6% 38.2% 47.7% 45.6% 38.3% 7.8% 4.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 358 2.9% 19.1% 10.9% 6.8% 46.6% 34.5% 36.6% 46.6% 5.9% 12.1%
Male 187 -5.4% 11.1% 15.5% 9.2% 50.3% 40.1% 30.5% 42.2% 3.7% 8.6%
Female 170 12.2% 27.6% 5.9% 4.2% 42.4% 28.7% 43.5% 51.3% 8.2% 15.9%
Asian 32 13.5% 30.5% 6.3% 3.6% 40.6% 26.3% 50.0% 50.8% 3.1% 19.4%
Hispanic 259 0.9% 4.7% 12.4% 10.8% 47.1% 45.0% 35.9% 38.8% 4.6% 5.4%
Black 29 8.7% 6.9% 6.9% 10.0% 44.8% 43.5% 41.4% 40.0% 6.9% 6.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 13 -31.9% -21.4% 46.2% 27.4% 46.2% 54.5% 7.7% 17.2% 0.0% 1.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 139 -16.6% -24.8% 20.9% 28.6% 56.1% 56.6% 20.9% 13.9% 2.2% 0.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 328 3.7% 5.3% 9.5% 10.7% 47.3% 44.4% 37.2% 39.4% 6.1% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 339 -7.1% 15.7% 16.5% 5.7% 43.1% 31.1% 34.9% 47.9% 5.5% 15.3%
Male 169 -11.4% 8.0% 20.9% 7.9% 43.0% 36.6% 32.9% 44.6% 3.2% 10.9%
Female 170 -3.1% 23.8% 12.4% 3.4% 43.2% 25.3% 36.7% 51.4% 7.7% 19.9%
Asian 20 10.4% 28.0% 0.0% 2.4% 42.1% 22.1% 26.3% 50.7% 31.6% 24.7%
Hispanic 253 -9.6% 2.2% 19.3% 10.0% 42.8% 40.4% 36.2% 42.4% 1.6% 7.3%
Black 41 -7.5% 3.9% 17.5% 8.4% 42.5% 40.2% 35.0% 42.7% 5.0% 8.7%
White 24 6.7% 26.3% 0.0% 2.6% 45.8% 23.7% 29.2% 52.7% 25.0% 21.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 35 -41.0% -26.3% 45.2% 24.5% 48.4% 54.3% 6.5% 19.6% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 118 -34.0% -23.5% 32.4% 23.9% 54.1% 52.1% 12.6% 21.5% 0.9% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 241 -7.5% 2.1% 16.5% 9.6% 43.5% 40.9% 35.7% 42.0% 4.3% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 379 -1.4% 18.3% 9.2% 6.1% 44.7% 28.1% 41.5% 48.0% 4.6% 17.7%
Male 196 -8.2% 10.3% 13.1% 7.9% 47.6% 34.3% 35.6% 45.3% 3.7% 12.5%
Female 182 6.1% 26.9% 5.0% 4.2% 41.3% 21.5% 48.0% 50.9% 5.6% 23.5%
Asian 32 24.4% 29.0% 9.4% 3.3% 18.8% 20.2% 59.4% 51.7% 12.5% 24.8%
Hispanic 255 -6.5% 3.4% 10.8% 10.9% 48.2% 38.2% 37.3% 42.3% 3.6% 8.6%
Black 38 -11.4% 4.0% 8.3% 9.1% 55.6% 39.5% 33.3% 41.2% 2.8% 10.3%
White 53 12.9% 29.2% 1.9% 2.9% 37.7% 20.4% 56.6% 52.5% 3.8% 24.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 30 -32.7% -22.9% 25.9% 24.8% 59.3% 50.7% 14.8% 22.4% 0.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 128 -24.9% -20.2% 21.8% 21.8% 55.6% 50.9% 21.8% 25.4% 0.8% 1.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 235 -2.0% 5.6% 8.7% 9.4% 45.9% 37.6% 42.0% 44.2% 3.5% 8.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 404 -1.2% 27.7% 22.3% 9.8% 41.9% 25.5% 30.6% 45.9% 5.3% 18.9%
Male 203 -10.8% 20.1% 27.7% 12.5% 46.0% 30.5% 23.8% 43.3% 2.5% 13.8%
Female 201 8.7% 36.0% 16.8% 7.0% 37.6% 20.1% 37.6% 48.7% 8.1% 24.3%
Asian 43 9.5% 38.6% 14.0% 5.3% 39.5% 19.2% 30.2% 46.7% 16.3% 28.9%
Hispanic 239 -5.5% 13.4% 24.4% 14.4% 44.1% 35.2% 27.3% 41.4% 4.2% 9.0%
Black 49 2.6% 14.1% 16.7% 14.8% 43.8% 34.0% 37.5% 40.5% 2.1% 10.6%
White 70 6.3% 37.6% 23.9% 6.6% 32.8% 18.8% 38.8% 49.5% 4.5% 25.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 40 -28.4% -13.2% 57.1% 29.6% 34.3% 46.6% 8.6% 21.8% 0.0% 2.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 202 -8.1% 6.4% 23.9% 16.9% 47.3% 39.7% 23.9% 36.5% 5.0% 6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 265 -3.3% 13.9% 19.7% 13.9% 46.6% 35.2% 29.5% 41.9% 4.2% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 330 60.7% 33.9% 23.6% 26.4% 12.0% 22.4% 3.7% 17.3%
Male 255 60.6% 41.2% 23.9% 25.8% 12.7% 19.5% 2.8% 13.5%
Female 157 52.6% 26.5% 25.0% 26.9% 16.7% 25.4% 5.8% 21.1%
Asian 18 33.3% 17.2% 33.3% 22.1% 11.1% 27.6% 22.2% 33.1%
Black 27 63.0% 47.1% 29.6% 26.7% 3.7% 17.3% 3.7% 9.0%
White 20 70.0% 22.4% 15.0% 25.8% 15.0% 27.5% 0.0% 24.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 140 82.5% 79.9% 16.1% 15.8% 1.5% 3.6% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 317 59.2% 48.0% 24.5% 27.5% 12.4% 16.8% 3.8% 7.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 58.4% 34.5% 25.9% 26.3% 8.6% 21.4% 7.1% 17.8%
Male 252 60.6% 41.5% 24.6% 26.0% 8.4% 18.2% 6.4% 14.3%
Female 154 53.3% 27.3% 28.3% 26.6% 10.8% 24.8% 7.5% 21.4%
Asian 18 25.0% 16.6% 37.5% 22.0% 25.0% 28.2% 12.5% 33.2%
Black 29 54.5% 46.9% 36.4% 26.7% 0.0% 16.8% 9.1% 9.6%
White 24 71.4% 22.6% 14.3% 25.7% 7.1% 26.0% 7.1% 25.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 49 91.7% 79.0% 8.3% 14.9% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 2.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 86.5% 81.8% 9.4% 14.3% 4.2% 3.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 304 58.4% 48.9% 25.5% 27.3% 8.6% 15.8% 7.4% 8.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 376 47.9% 34.6% 30.8% 25.5% 14.3% 21.7% 7.0% 18.3%
Male 184 59.3% 42.2% 25.0% 24.9% 9.9% 18.7% 5.8% 14.2%
Female 192 37.3% 26.7% 36.2% 26.0% 18.4% 24.8% 8.1% 22.4%
Asian 27 30.8% 18.2% 30.8% 21.5% 19.2% 26.4% 19.2% 33.9%
Hispanic 276 51.5% 49.4% 30.9% 27.1% 11.5% 15.5% 6.1% 8.0%
Black 33 54.8% 47.5% 22.6% 25.6% 16.1% 17.2% 6.5% 9.7%
White 38 27.8% 23.1% 38.9% 24.7% 27.8% 26.4% 5.6% 25.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 94.1% 81.2% 0.0% 13.8% 5.9% 3.4% 0.0% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 141 77.3% 77.5% 18.2% 15.7% 3.0% 4.5% 1.5% 2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 283 48.7% 49.0% 31.1% 26.5% 13.9% 16.2% 6.4% 8.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 348 60.5% 33.6% 19.8% 26.0% 13.7% 22.5% 6.1% 17.9%
Male 186 66.5% 40.9% 16.2% 25.9% 13.5% 19.4% 3.8% 13.7%
Female 162 53.5% 26.0% 23.9% 26.0% 13.8% 25.8% 8.8% 22.2%
Asian 24 20.8% 16.2% 12.5% 22.0% 33.3% 28.7% 33.3% 33.1%
Hispanic 242 65.6% 48.5% 19.1% 27.4% 12.9% 16.4% 2.5% 7.7%
Black 40 66.7% 45.8% 12.8% 26.8% 10.3% 18.0% 10.3% 9.4%
White 28 38.5% 23.2% 34.6% 25.2% 15.4% 26.9% 11.5% 24.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 94.3% 80.8% 5.7% 13.4% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 1.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 149 83.8% 75.4% 13.5% 18.3% 2.7% 4.8% 0.0% 1.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 235 59.3% 48.8% 21.2% 26.8% 15.2% 16.5% 4.3% 7.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 419 52.0% 35.5% 26.0% 25.0% 15.3% 22.0% 6.7% 17.5%
Male 218 56.0% 42.1% 24.3% 25.2% 14.2% 19.1% 5.5% 13.5%
Female 201 47.8% 28.4% 27.9% 24.7% 16.4% 25.1% 8.0% 21.8%
Asian 28 21.4% 18.1% 25.0% 21.8% 35.7% 28.5% 17.9% 31.6%
Hispanic 277 56.7% 49.6% 26.4% 26.6% 12.6% 16.1% 4.3% 7.7%
Black 47 66.0% 49.4% 25.5% 26.2% 4.3% 16.3% 4.3% 8.1%
White 62 37.1% 26.1% 24.2% 24.0% 25.8% 26.0% 12.9% 23.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 93.8% 81.4% 6.3% 12.9% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 156 71.2% 72.2% 23.1% 20.7% 5.8% 5.9% 0.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 289 52.9% 49.3% 28.4% 26.8% 12.8% 15.9% 5.9% 8.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 330 50.6% 31.2% 27.6% 27.2% 17.5% 21.7% 4.3% 19.9%
Male 255 50.8% 33.7% 26.2% 25.9% 18.7% 20.3% 4.4% 20.2%
Female 157 50.0% 28.7% 27.6% 28.6% 18.6% 23.1% 3.8% 19.6%
Asian 18 16.7% 16.6% 33.3% 22.9% 33.3% 25.7% 16.7% 34.7%
Black 27 59.3% 47.8% 37.0% 27.2% 3.7% 16.4% 0.0% 8.6%
White 20 52.6% 20.7% 36.8% 25.1% 10.5% 25.9% 0.0% 28.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 140 69.6% 67.3% 22.5% 23.2% 8.0% 7.0% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 317 49.7% 43.3% 27.7% 29.6% 18.2% 17.2% 4.5% 9.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 53.6% 31.1% 29.1% 26.8% 12.2% 21.7% 5.0% 20.3%
Male 252 51.1% 33.8% 31.2% 25.6% 12.2% 19.9% 5.4% 20.8%
Female 154 53.4% 28.3% 31.6% 28.1% 12.0% 23.7% 3.0% 19.9%
Asian 18 37.5% 16.3% 31.3% 22.1% 25.0% 26.3% 6.3% 35.2%
Black 29 66.7% 47.6% 28.6% 27.6% 0.0% 16.9% 4.8% 7.9%
White 24 78.9% 20.2% 5.3% 24.9% 15.8% 25.3% 0.0% 29.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 49 83.8% 71.1% 13.5% 19.4% 2.7% 6.5% 0.0% 3.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 72.8% 68.1% 20.4% 22.1% 5.8% 7.0% 1.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 304 52.3% 43.3% 29.8% 29.3% 12.6% 17.7% 5.3% 9.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 376 44.3% 32.0% 27.3% 26.1% 18.8% 21.1% 9.7% 20.7%
Male 184 49.4% 35.1% 25.0% 24.6% 16.7% 19.2% 8.9% 21.1%
Female 192 39.7% 28.7% 29.3% 27.7% 20.7% 23.1% 10.3% 20.4%
Asian 27 14.8% 17.4% 25.9% 22.2% 40.7% 25.0% 18.5% 35.4%
Hispanic 276 48.1% 43.8% 25.8% 29.7% 17.3% 16.4% 8.8% 10.1%
Black 33 50.0% 49.3% 35.7% 26.7% 7.1% 15.4% 7.1% 8.7%
White 38 34.3% 21.1% 34.3% 24.0% 20.0% 25.3% 11.4% 29.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 91.7% 75.4% 8.3% 16.9% 0.0% 5.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 141 64.3% 67.1% 25.6% 22.6% 8.5% 6.8% 1.6% 3.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 283 44.7% 44.8% 27.9% 28.6% 17.6% 16.4% 9.9% 10.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 348 49.9% 31.5% 26.7% 27.0% 13.8% 21.5% 9.7% 20.0%
Male 186 52.2% 34.6% 23.4% 25.2% 15.2% 20.3% 9.2% 19.9%
Female 162 47.1% 28.2% 30.6% 29.0% 12.1% 22.7% 10.2% 20.2%
Asian 24 16.7% 16.9% 29.2% 22.6% 20.8% 26.8% 33.3% 33.7%
Hispanic 242 52.1% 43.8% 27.7% 30.2% 12.6% 16.6% 7.6% 9.4%
Black 40 61.5% 48.9% 20.5% 27.0% 7.7% 15.2% 10.3% 8.9%
White 28 34.6% 21.1% 19.2% 25.5% 34.6% 25.4% 11.5% 28.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 91.2% 74.9% 2.9% 17.4% 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 149 60.7% 63.1% 30.3% 25.4% 6.2% 8.1% 2.8% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 235 48.7% 45.1% 29.4% 29.0% 12.7% 16.8% 9.2% 9.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 419 52.7% 34.3% 28.2% 25.4% 11.7% 21.3% 7.4% 19.0%
Male 218 55.5% 36.7% 25.7% 24.4% 9.6% 19.8% 9.2% 19.1%
Female 201 49.8% 31.6% 30.8% 26.6% 13.9% 22.8% 5.5% 19.0%
Asian 28 28.6% 19.9% 28.6% 22.8% 14.3% 25.7% 28.6% 31.7%
Hispanic 277 56.7% 46.6% 31.0% 28.3% 8.3% 16.5% 4.0% 8.6%
Black 47 70.2% 52.0% 21.3% 26.0% 8.5% 14.6% 0.0% 7.4%
White 62 37.1% 24.8% 19.4% 23.9% 25.8% 25.0% 17.7% 26.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 93.8% 77.9% 6.3% 14.3% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 156 68.6% 64.5% 26.9% 24.2% 3.2% 8.4% 1.3% 2.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 289 52.2% 47.5% 31.1% 27.1% 11.1% 16.5% 5.5% 8.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 330 60.7% 33.9% 22.6% 27.7% 14.6% 21.6% 2.1% 16.9%
Male 255 61.7% 36.9% 23.3% 26.4% 13.4% 19.9% 1.6% 16.9%
Female 157 57.7% 30.8% 21.8% 29.0% 17.9% 23.3% 2.6% 16.9%
Asian 18 38.9% 22.6% 16.7% 28.4% 33.3% 26.2% 11.1% 22.8%
Black 27 51.9% 46.8% 29.6% 29.2% 18.5% 15.8% 0.0% 8.1%
White 20 70.0% 19.5% 10.0% 26.4% 15.0% 27.4% 5.0% 26.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 26 96.2% 74.5% 3.8% 17.1% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 140 88.5% 83.3% 9.4% 13.9% 2.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 317 60.1% 49.0% 22.5% 28.3% 15.2% 15.7% 2.2% 7.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 59.2% 33.6% 24.7% 27.0% 11.6% 22.0% 4.5% 17.4%
Male 252 60.5% 37.0% 22.8% 25.3% 12.3% 20.4% 4.4% 17.3%
Female 154 59.4% 30.0% 28.0% 28.8% 9.8% 23.7% 2.8% 17.4%
Asian 18 25.0% 20.4% 62.5% 27.3% 6.3% 28.7% 6.3% 23.6%
Black 29 60.0% 46.5% 28.0% 29.4% 4.0% 16.0% 8.0% 8.1%
White 24 76.2% 19.5% 9.5% 25.5% 14.3% 27.4% 0.0% 27.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 85.3% 83.7% 10.1% 13.1% 4.6% 2.6% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 304 60.1% 49.2% 23.9% 27.8% 11.2% 15.9% 4.7% 7.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 376 54.6% 34.1% 27.3% 26.6% 13.4% 21.8% 4.7% 17.6%
Male 184 58.5% 37.6% 23.4% 24.6% 12.9% 20.6% 5.3% 17.2%
Female 192 51.1% 30.4% 30.9% 28.7% 13.8% 23.0% 4.3% 17.9%
Asian 27 38.5% 23.0% 19.2% 26.8% 34.6% 27.2% 7.7% 23.0%
Hispanic 276 58.6% 51.3% 27.8% 26.8% 10.3% 15.0% 3.4% 6.9%
Black 33 59.4% 48.1% 31.3% 27.1% 0.0% 16.8% 9.4% 8.1%
White 38 33.3% 19.5% 27.8% 26.2% 30.6% 27.2% 8.3% 27.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 83.3% 75.5% 11.1% 16.8% 5.6% 5.3% 0.0% 2.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 141 84.0% 80.5% 12.2% 13.5% 3.1% 3.8% 0.8% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 283 55.1% 49.9% 30.9% 26.9% 9.9% 15.7% 4.0% 7.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 348 65.8% 33.3% 16.8% 26.8% 12.5% 22.4% 4.9% 17.5%
Male 186 68.1% 36.4% 15.7% 25.4% 11.9% 20.8% 4.3% 17.4%
Female 162 63.1% 30.1% 18.1% 28.2% 13.1% 24.2% 5.6% 17.6%
Asian 24 25.0% 21.7% 29.2% 28.4% 29.2% 28.5% 16.7% 21.4%
Hispanic 242 71.9% 51.2% 16.1% 26.9% 9.1% 15.2% 2.9% 6.6%
Black 40 69.2% 46.5% 15.4% 27.7% 10.3% 17.1% 5.1% 8.7%
White 28 30.8% 19.8% 15.4% 26.0% 38.5% 27.7% 15.4% 26.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 91.4% 75.5% 2.9% 16.4% 5.7% 5.6% 0.0% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 149 88.6% 77.9% 10.1% 16.8% 1.3% 4.3% 0.0% 0.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 235 65.1% 49.6% 19.0% 27.5% 11.6% 15.7% 4.3% 7.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 419 59.4% 35.1% 23.4% 26.2% 11.9% 20.4% 5.3% 18.4%
Male 218 59.6% 38.1% 22.9% 25.3% 11.5% 18.9% 6.0% 17.8%
Female 201 59.2% 31.8% 23.9% 27.1% 12.4% 22.0% 4.5% 19.0%
Asian 28 35.7% 25.1% 28.6% 30.0% 14.3% 23.2% 21.4% 21.6%
Hispanic 277 68.2% 52.7% 21.3% 26.6% 7.9% 13.4% 2.5% 7.4%
Black 47 66.0% 50.3% 25.5% 26.9% 6.4% 15.1% 2.1% 7.7%
White 62 29.0% 22.5% 27.4% 25.0% 32.3% 25.5% 11.3% 26.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -100.0% 76.6% -100.0% 15.1% -100.0% 5.5% -100.0% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 156 84.6% 76.1% 14.7% 18.8% 0.6% 3.8% 0.0% 1.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 289 63.7% 50.6% 21.1% 26.8% 11.4% 14.5% 3.8% 8.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 330 55.3% 29.2% 29.4% 28.5% 10.9% 22.2% 4.5% 20.1%
Male 255 55.6% 32.0% 29.5% 27.9% 10.8% 20.3% 4.1% 19.8%
Female 157 55.0% 26.3% 27.5% 29.1% 12.8% 24.2% 4.7% 20.4%
Asian 18 29.4% 19.7% 29.4% 25.8% 23.5% 27.5% 17.6% 27.0%
Black 27 56.0% 43.3% 32.0% 31.1% 12.0% 16.7% 0.0% 8.9%
White 20 60.0% 17.2% 30.0% 24.9% 5.0% 26.9% 5.0% 31.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 26 80.8% 58.7% 19.2% 28.1% 0.0% 9.3% 0.0% 3.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 140 79.2% 67.3% 19.2% 27.3% 1.5% 4.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 317 54.5% 41.3% 29.6% 31.6% 11.3% 17.5% 4.7% 9.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 50.0% 29.3% 28.3% 28.1% 18.3% 22.6% 3.4% 20.0%
Male 252 49.6% 31.7% 30.0% 27.6% 17.0% 20.8% 3.5% 19.9%
Female 154 55.4% 26.8% 28.1% 28.7% 13.7% 24.5% 2.9% 20.0%
Asian 18 23.5% 17.6% 35.3% 26.0% 35.3% 29.0% 5.9% 27.3%
Black 29 64.0% 44.8% 16.0% 29.9% 16.0% 16.3% 4.0% 8.9%
White 24 58.8% 16.9% 17.6% 24.5% 23.5% 27.6% 0.0% 31.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 49 80.0% 57.1% 12.5% 29.2% 7.5% 9.6% 0.0% 4.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 77.4% 68.9% 17.9% 25.7% 4.7% 4.4% 0.0% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 304 51.1% 41.7% 27.6% 31.7% 17.6% 17.7% 3.7% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 376 48.5% 29.6% 31.3% 27.9% 15.2% 22.2% 5.0% 20.2%
Male 184 54.3% 32.7% 26.6% 27.1% 12.7% 20.0% 6.4% 20.2%
Female 192 43.1% 26.4% 35.6% 28.8% 17.6% 24.4% 3.7% 20.3%
Asian 27 40.7% 20.2% 22.2% 28.4% 22.2% 25.0% 14.8% 26.5%
Hispanic 276 52.6% 43.3% 30.8% 31.4% 12.8% 16.6% 3.8% 8.7%
Black 33 56.7% 44.5% 36.7% 29.4% 6.7% 16.5% 0.0% 9.5%
White 38 16.7% 17.2% 36.1% 24.7% 36.1% 27.5% 11.1% 30.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 82.4% 60.0% 11.8% 27.0% 5.9% 9.3% 0.0% 3.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 141 74.4% 68.6% 21.1% 23.4% 3.8% 5.6% 0.8% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 283 48.5% 42.7% 33.7% 30.6% 13.7% 17.0% 4.1% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 348 52.9% 28.8% 28.8% 28.8% 11.9% 22.9% 6.4% 19.5%
Male 186 53.5% 31.5% 27.6% 28.3% 13.0% 20.8% 5.9% 19.4%
Female 162 52.2% 25.8% 30.2% 29.4% 10.7% 25.2% 6.9% 19.6%
Asian 24 16.7% 18.8% 29.2% 27.6% 41.7% 28.2% 12.5% 25.4%
Hispanic 242 57.7% 42.6% 28.2% 32.6% 10.0% 16.7% 4.1% 8.0%
Black 40 61.5% 43.0% 23.1% 31.7% 7.7% 16.7% 7.7% 8.6%
White 28 26.9% 17.5% 34.6% 25.4% 15.4% 27.9% 23.1% 29.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 82.4% 60.6% 11.8% 27.3% 0.0% 8.3% 5.9% 3.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 149 68.2% 65.3% 29.1% 27.6% 2.0% 5.7% 0.7% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 235 51.9% 41.8% 30.7% 32.1% 11.7% 17.3% 5.6% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 419 60.4% 32.4% 21.5% 22.3% 13.1% 24.7% 5.0% 20.6%
Male 218 58.3% 35.0% 23.4% 22.2% 12.8% 22.8% 5.5% 20.1%
Female 201 62.7% 29.7% 19.4% 22.5% 13.4% 26.7% 4.5% 21.1%
Asian 28 32.1% 22.3% 28.6% 21.3% 17.9% 32.5% 21.4% 23.9%
Hispanic 277 67.9% 47.2% 18.8% 26.0% 10.5% 19.0% 2.9% 7.8%
Black 47 57.4% 50.3% 29.8% 23.0% 12.8% 18.1% 0.0% 8.6%
White 62 43.5% 21.2% 24.2% 20.0% 22.6% 28.4% 9.7% 30.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 84.4% 63.7% 9.4% 22.1% 6.3% 10.3% 0.0% 3.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 156 80.1% 67.7% 14.1% 22.6% 5.1% 8.4% 0.6% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 289 61.6% 45.7% 23.2% 25.4% 11.4% 19.2% 3.8% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 6 Students Tested: 483
James Cashman Middle School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
15.3%State:
19.6%
Meets Standard This School:
67.1%Nevada:
64.7%
Exceeds Standard This School:
8.7%Nevada:
5.7%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 483 9.9% 4.5% 8.9% 10.0% 15.3% 19.6% 67.1% 64.7% 8.7% 5.7%
Male 269 11.8% 3.1% 8.6% 11.4% 13.8% 19.6% 65.4% 63.2% 12.3% 5.8%
Female 214 7.5% 5.9% 9.4% 8.6% 17.3% 19.6% 69.2% 66.2% 4.2% 5.6%
Asian 42 22.2% 20.5% 2.4% 3.7% 9.5% 9.8% 57.1% 71.9% 31.0% 14.6%
Hispanic 303 3.4% -2.5% 11.6% 12.6% 19.1% 23.9% 64.0% 61.2% 5.3% 2.2%
Black 39 3.3% -17.3% 12.8% 20.7% 18.0% 30.7% 69.2% 47.2% 0.0% 1.3%
White 69 29.8% 14.3% 0.0% 5.8% 4.4% 14.0% 81.2% 71.3% 14.5% 8.9%
Two or more Races 25 22.1% 11.2% 8.0% 8.1% 4.0% 14.8% 76.0% 69.5% 12.0% 7.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 40 -28.4% -22.4% 47.5% 27.6% 15.0% 28.9% 37.5% 42.0% 0.0% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 196 -10.8% -15.1% 17.4% 18.7% 27.6% 30.6% 53.1% 49.7% 2.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 391 6.2% -4.7% 10.0% 14.2% 17.9% 24.6% 67.3% 58.6% 4.9% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 509 5.2% -1.9% 8.4% 11.9% 20.4% 24.0% 57.8% 58.5% 13.4% 5.5%
Male 271 6.8% -3.0% 8.9% 13.4% 18.5% 23.7% 56.1% 57.1% 16.6% 5.8%
Female 238 3.4% -0.8% 8.0% 10.4% 22.7% 24.4% 59.7% 60.0% 9.7% 5.1%
Asian 52 26.4% 13.0% 3.8% 5.6% 3.8% 15.5% 57.7% 67.0% 34.6% 11.9%
Hispanic 333 -2.8% -11.6% 10.8% 14.9% 26.1% 30.9% 58.0% 52.0% 5.1% 2.2%
Black 35 2.7% -21.9% 8.6% 24.0% 22.9% 32.0% 48.6% 42.3% 20.0% 1.7%
White 86 24.8% 10.0% 2.3% 7.0% 7.0% 17.1% 60.5% 67.5% 30.2% 8.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 24 -49.2% -21.4% 45.8% 24.4% 37.5% 31.1% 12.5% 41.8% 4.2% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 136 -28.4% -38.9% 22.8% 30.5% 39.7% 42.5% 37.5% 26.7% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 365 -0.4% -13.5% 11.0% 16.8% 23.6% 30.8% 58.1% 50.3% 7.4% 2.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 510 16.1% 12.3% 8.6% 8.9% 20.6% 24.2% 33.9% 42.2% 36.9% 24.7%
Male 278 17.3% 10.9% 8.3% 10.3% 19.8% 24.1% 28.8% 40.3% 43.2% 25.3%
Female 232 14.7% 13.7% 9.1% 7.4% 21.6% 24.3% 40.1% 44.2% 29.3% 24.1%
Asian 57 36.6% 27.1% 1.8% 3.7% 7.0% 14.5% 14.0% 41.6% 77.2% 40.3%
Hispanic 312 8.8% 2.7% 9.9% 11.5% 26.6% 31.1% 40.7% 42.6% 22.8% 14.7%
Black 42 4.9% -5.9% 14.3% 17.9% 26.2% 33.3% 33.3% 37.8% 26.2% 11.0%
White 97 33.0% 23.0% 6.2% 5.0% 6.2% 17.3% 23.7% 43.0% 63.9% 34.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 -30.3% -28.4% 40.5% 36.9% 35.1% 36.8% 10.8% 21.5% 13.5% 4.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 152 -15.9% -21.2% 16.4% 22.5% 44.7% 44.0% 35.5% 30.0% 3.3% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 344 9.9% 2.2% 11.0% 12.7% 24.4% 30.5% 35.8% 42.1% 28.8% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 296 -6.7% 7.6% 16.9% 12.5% 35.1% 25.2% 37.8% 39.5% 10.1% 22.8%
Male 152 -6.6% 5.7% 18.4% 14.4% 33.6% 25.1% 36.2% 37.7% 11.8% 22.7%
Female 144 -6.8% 9.6% 15.3% 10.4% 36.8% 25.3% 39.6% 41.4% 8.3% 22.9%
Asian 18 0.9% 22.4% 11.1% 5.5% 33.3% 17.4% 27.8% 41.3% 27.8% 35.7%
Hispanic 235 -7.4% -3.1% 17.9% 16.4% 34.9% 32.1% 40.0% 38.3% 7.2% 13.2%
Black 21 -21.3% -11.4% 28.6% 25.2% 38.1% 31.6% 28.6% 31.8% 4.8% 11.4%
White 22 9.0% 19.4% 0.0% 7.1% 36.4% 18.9% 31.8% 42.0% 31.8% 32.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -22.5% -33.2% 42.9% 44.1% 25.0% 34.5% 32.1% 17.5% 0.0% 4.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 154 -20.3% -28.7% 26.0% 31.9% 39.6% 42.1% 32.5% 23.4% 1.9% 2.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 296 -6.7% -4.5% 16.9% 17.8% 35.1% 32.1% 37.8% 37.4% 10.1% 12.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 372 4.4% 16.6% 19.6% 14.4% 32.7% 25.7% 39.2% 40.7% 8.4% 19.2%
Male 194 1.7% 14.8% 23.6% 16.7% 31.4% 25.2% 37.7% 38.5% 7.3% 19.6%
Female 178 7.3% 18.5% 15.3% 12.0% 34.1% 26.3% 40.9% 43.0% 9.7% 18.8%
Asian 24 31.7% 31.7% 8.3% 6.8% 16.7% 18.2% 66.7% 43.6% 8.3% 31.4%
Hispanic 280 3.3% 4.2% 20.6% 19.5% 32.9% 32.9% 37.9% 37.4% 8.7% 10.2%
Black 37 -0.1% -3.1% 18.9% 26.7% 37.8% 33.1% 35.1% 32.2% 8.1% 8.0%
White 26 -1.6% 29.4% 25.0% 8.4% 33.3% 18.9% 37.5% 45.2% 4.2% 27.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 29 -33.0% -24.1% 62.1% 48.0% 27.6% 32.9% 10.3% 15.8% 0.0% 3.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 164 -13.2% -22.2% 31.3% 37.5% 38.7% 41.5% 28.2% 19.1% 1.8% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 346 4.5% 3.8% 19.1% 20.5% 33.1% 32.4% 39.3% 37.0% 8.5% 10.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 7 Students Tested: 477
James Cashman Middle School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Exceeds Standard This School:
18.7%State:
7.7%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 477 6.4% 4.5% 11.7% 11.4% 15.9% 18.2% 53.7% 62.7% 18.7% 7.7%
Male 275 4.6% 3.1% 13.5% 12.5% 16.0% 18.6% 48.4% 61.0% 22.2% 8.0%
Female 202 8.9% 6.1% 9.4% 10.2% 15.8% 17.8% 60.9% 64.5% 13.9% 7.5%
Asian 38 28.8% 20.0% 2.6% 4.9% 2.6% 9.1% 44.7% 67.0% 50.0% 19.0%
Hispanic 316 -0.7% -3.6% 14.6% 14.8% 20.3% 22.9% 56.3% 58.9% 8.9% 3.5%
Black 27 -6.6% -14.8% 18.5% 22.8% 22.2% 26.1% 40.7% 49.0% 18.5% 2.1%
White 72 28.6% 15.0% 2.8% 6.3% 2.8% 12.9% 55.6% 69.2% 38.9% 11.7%
Two or more Races 19 13.1% 10.2% 5.3% 7.5% 15.8% 16.4% 36.8% 65.8% 42.1% 10.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 31 -40.1% -29.6% 58.1% 38.3% 16.1% 25.4% 22.6% 33.8% 3.2% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 183 -15.6% -23.3% 23.5% 26.3% 26.2% 31.2% 47.0% 41.8% 3.3% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 384 0.2% -4.8% 14.3% 15.9% 19.5% 23.0% 54.7% 57.6% 11.5% 3.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 473 0.5% -0.6% 12.9% 12.2% 20.7% 22.5% 49.7% 59.0% 16.7% 6.3%
Male 261 -0.4% -0.9% 12.3% 13.1% 22.2% 22.0% 45.6% 58.3% 19.9% 6.7%
Female 212 1.6% -0.2% 13.7% 11.3% 18.9% 23.0% 54.7% 59.8% 12.7% 5.9%
Asian 55 26.8% 14.1% 1.8% 4.9% 5.5% 15.0% 45.5% 66.0% 47.3% 14.1%
Hispanic 297 -11.4% -11.9% 15.5% 16.9% 30.0% 29.1% 46.5% 51.6% 8.1% 2.4%
Black 33 -2.3% -17.6% 30.3% 22.0% 6.1% 29.6% 54.5% 46.0% 9.1% 2.3%
White 87 24.9% 11.3% 4.6% 6.7% 4.6% 16.1% 60.9% 67.8% 29.9% 9.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 31 -43.3% -26.2% 41.9% 32.3% 35.5% 28.0% 16.1% 37.2% 6.5% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 118 -42.2% -42.6% 29.7% 38.0% 46.6% 38.8% 22.9% 22.9% 0.8% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 334 -7.5% -12.1% 16.5% 17.8% 25.1% 28.5% 49.7% 51.1% 8.7% 2.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 329 1.9% 8.7% 16.4% 11.6% 27.1% 25.1% 36.2% 39.5% 20.4% 23.8%
Male 179 1.2% 6.4% 16.8% 13.6% 27.4% 25.3% 32.4% 37.7% 23.5% 23.4%
Female 150 2.7% 11.0% 16.0% 9.5% 26.7% 24.9% 40.7% 41.5% 16.7% 24.2%
Asian 27 19.4% 23.9% 0.0% 5.3% 25.9% 16.1% 37.0% 38.4% 37.0% 40.1%
Hispanic 244 -5.1% -1.7% 20.1% 15.4% 30.3% 31.6% 35.2% 39.0% 14.3% 13.9%
Black 28 6.0% -9.1% 17.9% 22.0% 21.4% 32.4% 32.1% 33.8% 28.6% 11.8%
White 30 38.7% 19.7% 0.0% 6.6% 6.7% 19.1% 46.7% 41.6% 46.7% 32.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 26 -27.7% -33.5% 34.6% 43.6% 38.5% 35.3% 26.9% 17.9% 0.0% 3.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 146 -19.7% -30.1% 28.1% 33.0% 37.0% 42.4% 29.5% 21.3% 5.5% 3.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 236 -0.9% -2.4% 18.6% 16.2% 27.5% 31.5% 37.3% 38.3% 16.5% 14.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 343 6.3% 4.5% 14.0% 14.3% 25.1% 26.5% 38.2% 38.2% 22.7% 20.9%
Male 184 2.4% 2.1% 17.4% 16.7% 25.5% 26.6% 33.2% 36.0% 23.9% 20.7%
Female 159 10.7% 6.9% 10.1% 11.9% 24.5% 26.5% 44.0% 40.5% 21.4% 21.1%
Asian 18 28.7% 21.0% 11.1% 6.6% 5.6% 17.7% 55.6% 40.3% 27.8% 35.4%
Hispanic 263 3.5% -7.7% 14.4% 19.7% 27.4% 33.4% 34.2% 35.5% 24.0% 11.5%
Black 32 17.2% -13.0% 3.1% 24.4% 25.0% 33.9% 59.4% 32.3% 12.5% 9.4%
White 27 4.6% 16.3% 25.9% 8.7% 14.8% 20.3% 40.7% 41.7% 18.5% 29.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -26.1% -37.4% 42.9% 48.3% 28.6% 34.4% 25.0% 14.4% 3.6% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 151 -16.3% -33.7% 22.5% 38.0% 39.1% 41.0% 28.5% 18.2% 9.9% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 343 6.3% -8.5% 14.0% 20.3% 25.1% 33.5% 38.2% 34.9% 22.7% 11.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 321 5.9% 14.8% 20.6% 15.2% 30.2% 26.7% 38.1% 39.2% 11.1% 18.9%
Male 170 5.5% 12.1% 23.5% 18.1% 27.7% 26.5% 34.3% 36.1% 14.5% 19.3%
Female 151 6.4% 17.6% 17.4% 12.2% 32.9% 26.8% 42.3% 42.5% 7.4% 18.5%
Asian 19 25.1% 33.4% 15.8% 7.0% 15.8% 16.3% 47.4% 44.2% 21.1% 32.5%
Hispanic 253 7.5% 1.4% 19.8% 21.2% 29.4% 34.0% 41.1% 35.5% 9.7% 9.2%
Black 25 -10.0% -2.4% 25.0% 25.5% 41.7% 33.7% 20.8% 32.9% 12.5% 8.0%
White 23 -8.5% 27.2% 30.4% 9.0% 34.8% 20.5% 17.4% 42.9% 17.4% 27.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 40 -27.9% -26.4% 53.8% 50.4% 30.8% 32.7% 12.8% 14.7% 2.6% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 124 -14.4% -23.0% 30.6% 40.0% 40.5% 39.7% 25.6% 18.1% 3.3% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 290 6.9% 1.5% 19.6% 21.2% 30.2% 34.0% 39.6% 35.8% 10.5% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 8 Students Tested: 444
This School:
99.8%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
8.1%State:
8.8%
Approaches Standard This School:
29.1%State:
32.0%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 444 -3.1% -6.7% 8.1% 8.8% 29.1% 32.0% 52.6% 55.0% 10.2% 4.2%
Male 248 -5.0% -8.8% 10.5% 10.3% 28.6% 32.6% 49.2% 52.9% 11.7% 4.3%
Female 196 -0.8% -4.6% 5.1% 7.2% 29.7% 31.4% 56.9% 57.2% 8.2% 4.2%
Asian 48 23.7% 15.3% 2.1% 3.1% 8.3% 15.7% 56.3% 67.7% 33.3% 13.6%
Hispanic 283 -12.3% -16.6% 8.9% 11.3% 37.6% 39.4% 49.7% 47.6% 3.9% 1.7%
Black 29 -14.2% -25.0% 24.1% 16.6% 24.1% 42.5% 51.7% 39.7% 0.0% 1.2%
White 62 18.0% 3.4% 0.0% 5.5% 16.1% 25.2% 62.9% 63.5% 21.0% 5.9%
Two or more Races 18 17.4% 1.8% 11.1% 6.4% 5.6% 25.9% 61.1% 62.0% 22.2% 5.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -37.8% -39.2% 40.6% 28.4% 31.3% 45.0% 28.1% 25.6% 0.0% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 130 -31.3% -39.2% 14.6% 21.4% 50.8% 51.9% 33.9% 26.0% 0.8% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 344 -10.2% -16.9% 9.3% 12.1% 35.0% 39.0% 49.6% 47.0% 6.1% 2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 341 -15.0% -10.0% 15.6% 13.5% 33.5% 30.6% 45.6% 52.2% 5.3% 3.7%
Male 173 -4.6% -10.5% 7.5% 14.2% 31.2% 30.4% 52.0% 51.6% 9.2% 3.8%
Female 168 -25.8% -9.5% 24.0% 12.8% 35.9% 30.8% 38.9% 52.8% 1.2% 3.6%
Asian 30 4.1% 9.6% 10.0% 5.4% 20.0% 19.1% 43.3% 65.7% 26.7% 9.8%
Hispanic 242 -24.2% -21.7% 19.4% 18.3% 38.8% 37.5% 40.1% 42.9% 1.7% 1.3%
Black 30 -5.9% -25.9% 10.0% 22.4% 30.0% 37.6% 60.0% 38.9% 0.0% 1.2%
White 39 20.9% 0.6% 0.0% 8.6% 13.2% 25.0% 71.1% 61.1% 15.8% 5.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 30 -29.2% -37.4% 30.0% 32.5% 33.3% 39.0% 36.7% 27.9% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 -40.3% -50.0% 28.9% 39.0% 45.5% 45.1% 24.8% 15.3% 0.8% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 263 -18.2% -22.1% 16.8% 19.4% 35.5% 36.8% 43.9% 42.3% 3.8% 1.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 322 -7.2% 0.0% 16.8% 13.0% 35.7% 32.3% 39.4% 41.1% 8.1% 13.6%
Male 169 -5.6% 0.1% 16.0% 14.0% 34.9% 31.2% 39.6% 40.3% 9.5% 14.5%
Female 153 -8.9% -0.1% 17.6% 12.1% 36.6% 33.4% 39.2% 41.8% 6.5% 12.7%
Asian 22 13.5% 17.2% 9.1% 5.7% 22.7% 22.5% 50.0% 45.4% 18.2% 26.5%
Hispanic 242 -9.2% -13.1% 18.6% 18.8% 36.0% 39.7% 37.2% 35.3% 8.3% 6.2%
Black 27 -6.5% -18.5% 7.4% 23.5% 44.4% 40.3% 44.4% 30.7% 3.7% 5.4%
White 30 -8.0% 12.4% 16.7% 7.1% 36.7% 25.9% 43.3% 47.6% 3.3% 19.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -46.7% -39.8% 56.0% 45.9% 36.0% 39.2% 8.0% 13.6% 0.0% 1.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 109 -32.7% -39.9% 26.6% 42.2% 51.4% 43.0% 20.2% 13.1% 1.8% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 232 -1.7% -12.8% 15.5% 18.7% 31.5% 39.4% 44.0% 35.3% 9.1% 6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 285 -4.1% -2.3% 18.6% 17.0% 30.9% 30.7% 45.6% 41.9% 4.9% 10.4%
Male 163 -1.3% -3.4% 18.4% 18.3% 28.2% 30.4% 47.2% 40.3% 6.1% 11.0%
Female 122 -7.9% -1.2% 18.9% 15.5% 34.4% 31.1% 43.4% 43.6% 3.3% 9.8%
Asian 22 4.4% 15.4% 9.1% 8.3% 31.8% 21.6% 54.5% 48.6% 4.5% 21.5%
Hispanic 217 -1.7% -16.2% 17.5% 24.2% 29.5% 37.3% 48.4% 34.5% 4.6% 4.0%
Black 23 -32.9% -20.5% 39.1% 28.3% 39.1% 37.5% 17.4% 30.9% 4.3% 3.3%
White 22 -4.7% 11.1% 18.2% 9.4% 31.8% 24.8% 40.9% 49.8% 9.1% 15.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -29.7% -41.6% 56.3% 53.5% 18.8% 33.4% 25.0% 12.2% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 103 -26.5% -40.9% 29.1% 47.5% 42.7% 38.7% 28.2% 13.1% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 285 -4.1% -15.8% 18.6% 24.2% 30.9% 36.9% 45.6% 34.9% 4.9% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 357 11.3% 9.5% 16.3% 19.0% 29.1% 28.2% 46.9% 43.1% 7.7% 9.7%
Male 183 12.5% 8.9% 15.5% 20.6% 28.7% 27.2% 46.4% 41.8% 9.4% 10.4%
Female 174 10.0% 10.1% 17.2% 17.3% 29.6% 29.3% 47.3% 44.5% 5.9% 8.9%
Asian 32 34.8% 27.5% 12.5% 10.3% 9.4% 18.9% 62.5% 50.6% 15.6% 20.1%
Hispanic 258 6.9% -5.7% 17.4% 27.1% 32.4% 35.3% 44.7% 33.9% 5.5% 3.8%
Black 28 10.3% -10.5% 10.7% 33.4% 35.7% 33.7% 50.0% 29.6% 3.6% 3.2%
White 36 21.4% 23.5% 14.7% 10.4% 20.6% 22.8% 44.1% 52.5% 20.6% 14.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -34.2% -30.9% 36.4% 56.6% 54.5% 31.0% 9.1% 11.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 138 -1.4% -30.1% 25.7% 51.2% 32.4% 35.6% 41.9% 12.4% 0.0% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 322 12.4% -4.8% 15.2% 26.6% 29.1% 34.8% 48.7% 34.5% 7.0% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 334 -10.4% 7.2% 27.2% 16.4% 39.8% 33.2% 30.2% 39.8% 2.7% 10.7%
Male 172 -10.2% 6.0% 31.4% 18.6% 35.5% 32.1% 30.2% 38.0% 2.9% 11.3%
Female 162 -10.6% 8.3% 22.8% 14.1% 44.4% 34.3% 30.2% 41.6% 2.5% 10.1%
Asian 19 40.9% 24.3% 5.3% 8.1% 10.5% 24.4% 63.2% 47.4% 21.1% 20.2%
Hispanic 244 -15.8% -8.0% 28.7% 24.0% 43.9% 40.8% 25.8% 31.5% 1.6% 3.8%
Black 40 -8.3% -11.0% 27.5% 27.8% 37.5% 39.9% 32.5% 28.2% 2.5% 4.1%
White 29 -1.9% 20.0% 27.6% 9.5% 31.0% 27.2% 41.4% 47.4% 0.0% 15.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 34 -34.5% -32.3% 64.7% 52.2% 26.5% 36.9% 8.8% 10.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 128 -26.9% -25.8% 40.6% 40.7% 43.0% 41.7% 16.4% 15.4% 0.0% 2.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 244 -11.3% -8.4% 26.6% 24.3% 41.4% 40.8% 29.5% 30.9% 2.5% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 401 -17.8% 5.7% 36.3% 19.6% 38.2% 31.4% 22.0% 38.1% 3.5% 10.9%
Male 206 -19.2% 5.1% 42.4% 22.1% 33.5% 29.5% 18.8% 36.7% 5.2% 11.7%
Female 194 -16.6% 6.7% 30.0% 16.5% 43.3% 33.5% 25.0% 39.8% 1.7% 10.1%
Asian 34 0.5% 20.3% 21.9% 11.6% 34.4% 24.8% 28.1% 44.6% 15.6% 19.1%
Hispanic 267 -22.2% -9.6% 41.4% 28.8% 37.5% 37.6% 19.5% 29.4% 1.6% 4.3%
Black 40 -16.8% -15.2% 26.5% 33.6% 47.1% 38.3% 26.5% 24.9% 0.0% 3.2%
White 59 -10.0% 18.2% 27.8% 11.6% 38.9% 26.9% 25.9% 45.7% 7.4% 15.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -35.3% -31.9% 80.0% 60.0% 12.0% 28.6% 8.0% 10.3% 0.0% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 132 -31.0% -26.4% 53.3% 44.5% 34.4% 38.7% 12.3% 15.3% 0.0% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 274 -20.4% -9.6% 35.2% 28.9% 41.9% 37.4% 20.9% 29.4% 2.0% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 385 -5.2% 15.9% 29.9% 18.7% 43.3% 33.4% 23.1% 37.5% 3.7% 10.4%
Male 190 -9.4% 15.0% 32.1% 21.4% 45.3% 31.5% 18.4% 35.7% 4.2% 11.3%
Female 189 -1.2% 17.1% 27.6% 15.5% 41.6% 35.4% 27.6% 39.6% 3.2% 9.5%
Asian 38 7.5% 28.6% 13.2% 9.9% 47.4% 29.6% 23.7% 43.8% 15.8% 16.7%
Hispanic 226 -9.3% -1.0% 33.8% 27.4% 43.6% 41.6% 20.4% 27.1% 2.2% 4.0%
Black 45 -9.3% -5.2% 29.5% 32.3% 47.7% 40.9% 22.7% 23.6% 0.0% 3.2%
White 61 10.4% 28.6% 18.6% 11.6% 39.0% 27.7% 37.3% 45.7% 5.1% 14.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 43 -29.4% -22.9% 79.5% 58.4% 17.9% 32.5% 2.6% 8.3% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 135 -19.3% -18.3% 44.0% 41.9% 43.3% 44.4% 12.7% 12.6% 0.0% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 249 -6.6% -0.4% 29.0% 27.4% 45.6% 41.0% 21.4% 27.6% 4.0% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 6
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
19.1%State:
24.8%
Approaches Standard This School:
15.7%Nevada:
17.9%
Exceeds Standard This School:
32.5%State:
22.0%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 483 -0.7% -8.6% 19.1% 24.8% 15.7% 17.9% 32.7% 35.3% 32.5% 22.0%
Male 269 -2.0% -13.4% 18.6% 29.3% 17.5% 18.3% 30.1% 33.2% 33.8% 19.3%
Female 214 0.9% -3.5% 19.6% 20.1% 13.6% 17.5% 36.0% 37.6% 30.8% 24.9%
Asian 42 17.4% 7.4% 2.4% 12.3% 14.3% 14.5% 28.6% 37.8% 54.8% 35.4%
Hispanic 303 -8.1% -18.7% 24.4% 31.6% 17.8% 21.2% 34.3% 34.1% 23.4% 13.1%
Black 39 -6.9% -28.1% 25.6% 41.1% 15.4% 21.2% 38.5% 27.7% 20.5% 10.1%
White 69 19.6% 3.9% 2.9% 15.9% 11.6% 14.3% 21.7% 37.7% 63.8% 32.1%
Two or more Races 25 14.1% -0.1% 16.0% 18.9% 4.0% 15.4% 40.0% 37.2% 40.0% 28.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 196 -25.1% -35.9% 35.2% 45.4% 24.0% 24.6% 31.6% 25.5% 9.2% 4.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 391 -6.3% -20.0% 22.3% 33.1% 18.2% 21.0% 34.3% 32.8% 25.3% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 509 0.5% -0.5% 9.8% 8.8% 23.8% 25.8% 34.2% 38.5% 32.2% 27.0%
Male 271 1.6% -6.0% 11.4% 11.9% 21.0% 28.3% 32.8% 36.8% 34.7% 23.1%
Female 238 -0.8% 5.4% 8.0% 5.6% 26.9% 23.1% 35.7% 40.2% 29.4% 31.0%
Asian 52 18.7% 11.4% 5.8% 3.9% 9.6% 18.8% 28.8% 38.4% 55.8% 38.9%
Hispanic 333 -8.5% -10.3% 12.3% 11.3% 30.3% 33.1% 36.9% 38.3% 20.4% 17.3%
Black 35 -0.2% -17.0% 11.4% 17.0% 22.9% 34.0% 31.4% 33.5% 34.3% 15.4%
White 86 24.8% 11.2% 2.3% 5.2% 7.0% 17.7% 27.9% 39.9% 62.8% 37.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 136 -43.1% -44.6% 28.7% 26.7% 48.5% 52.0% 22.1% 19.7% 0.7% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 365 -6.2% -11.8% 12.6% 12.8% 27.7% 33.1% 35.9% 37.8% 23.8% 16.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 510 8.9% 7.7% 10.0% 9.7% 26.5% 28.0% 31.8% 39.9% 31.8% 22.4%
Male 278 11.5% 2.8% 11.5% 12.4% 22.3% 30.1% 30.6% 37.7% 35.6% 19.8%
Female 232 5.7% 12.8% 8.2% 6.8% 31.5% 25.7% 33.2% 42.3% 27.2% 25.2%
Asian 57 34.8% 20.5% 1.8% 4.2% 8.8% 20.6% 28.1% 43.2% 61.4% 32.0%
Hispanic 312 -1.5% -4.8% 11.5% 13.2% 35.3% 37.0% 32.7% 37.5% 20.5% 12.4%
Black 42 0.1% -6.9% 16.7% 16.2% 28.6% 36.0% 35.7% 35.5% 19.0% 12.2%
White 97 30.9% 20.4% 7.2% 5.8% 7.2% 19.1% 29.9% 42.6% 55.7% 32.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 -14.1% -37.1% 29.7% 41.9% 29.7% 40.5% 10.8% 14.1% 29.7% 3.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 152 -32.3% -36.0% 21.7% 28.1% 55.9% 53.2% 21.7% 17.4% 0.7% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 344 2.0% -4.8% 12.5% 14.0% 30.8% 36.1% 34.6% 37.3% 22.1% 12.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 296 -9.7% 5.2% 20.3% 12.5% 34.8% 27.6% 34.1% 41.1% 10.8% 18.8%
Male 152 -14.5% -0.1% 27.0% 16.2% 32.9% 29.2% 30.3% 39.4% 9.9% 15.1%
Female 144 -4.7% 10.8% 13.2% 8.7% 36.8% 25.9% 38.2% 42.8% 11.8% 22.7%
Asian 18 6.4% 17.7% 11.1% 6.7% 27.8% 20.9% 50.0% 45.4% 11.1% 27.0%
Hispanic 235 -14.2% -7.9% 22.6% 17.7% 37.0% 35.5% 31.1% 36.9% 9.4% 9.9%
Black 21 -2.3% -10.7% 19.0% 21.6% 28.6% 34.4% 38.1% 33.7% 14.3% 10.2%
White 22 18.1% 18.4% 4.5% 6.8% 22.7% 20.1% 50.0% 45.8% 22.7% 27.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -44.0% -36.9% 50.0% 45.4% 39.3% 36.8% 10.7% 15.4% 0.0% 2.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 154 -34.5% -38.6% 32.5% 37.2% 47.4% 46.7% 18.8% 15.3% 1.3% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 296 -9.7% -7.9% 20.3% 18.1% 34.8% 35.1% 34.1% 37.0% 10.8% 9.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 372 -2.4% 13.6% 18.0% 11.9% 41.1% 31.2% 36.5% 44.0% 4.4% 12.9%
Male 194 -9.3% 8.2% 22.5% 15.4% 43.5% 33.1% 28.8% 41.3% 5.2% 10.3%
Female 178 5.0% 19.2% 13.1% 8.3% 38.6% 29.2% 44.9% 46.9% 3.4% 15.5%
Asian 24 -1.6% 25.8% 12.5% 6.4% 45.8% 24.5% 29.2% 50.9% 12.5% 18.2%
Hispanic 280 -3.2% 0.2% 19.9% 17.2% 40.1% 39.2% 36.1% 37.4% 4.0% 6.1%
Black 37 -0.1% -5.1% 16.2% 20.8% 40.5% 41.0% 40.5% 32.7% 2.7% 5.5%
White 26 2.5% 27.3% 4.2% 6.3% 50.0% 23.0% 41.7% 51.0% 4.2% 19.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 29 -33.0% -27.1% 69.0% 42.5% 20.7% 41.3% 6.9% 15.1% 3.4% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 164 -26.7% -30.0% 31.9% 35.7% 51.5% 51.0% 16.6% 12.9% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 346 -1.7% -0.3% 17.9% 17.4% 40.5% 39.5% 37.5% 37.3% 4.1% 5.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 7 Students Tested: 477
This School:
100.0%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
23.9%State:
24.4%
Approaches Standard This School:
18.0%Nevada:
22.0%
Exceeds Standard This School:
27.0%Nevada:
18.4%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 477 -7.8% -12.2% 23.9% 24.4% 18.0% 22.0% 31.0% 35.3% 27.0% 18.4%
Male 275 -9.2% -19.0% 26.6% 30.6% 16.7% 22.5% 30.2% 32.8% 26.6% 14.1%
Female 202 -6.0% -5.1% 20.3% 17.8% 19.8% 21.5% 32.2% 38.0% 27.7% 22.9%
Asian 38 21.0% 3.8% 7.9% 13.2% 5.3% 17.1% 26.3% 38.8% 60.5% 30.9%
Hispanic 316 -16.2% -23.2% 29.1% 31.2% 21.2% 26.1% 33.5% 32.2% 16.1% 10.5%
Black 27 -25.2% -29.2% 25.9% 38.1% 33.3% 25.3% 7.4% 27.6% 33.3% 9.1%
White 72 18.8% 0.2% 6.9% 16.0% 8.3% 17.9% 33.3% 39.5% 51.4% 26.6%
Two or more Races 19 -8.0% -3.1% 31.6% 17.8% 10.5% 19.4% 26.3% 39.0% 31.6% 23.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 183 -36.4% -46.5% 46.5% 52.7% 24.0% 27.9% 26.8% 17.3% 2.7% 2.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 384 -14.9% -23.9% 28.7% 32.4% 20.3% 25.5% 31.5% 31.6% 19.5% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 473 9.2% 8.1% 4.9% 4.7% 20.1% 21.3% 43.1% 49.5% 31.9% 24.5%
Male 261 8.0% 3.3% 5.7% 6.5% 20.3% 24.3% 39.5% 48.2% 34.5% 21.1%
Female 212 10.5% 13.0% 3.8% 2.9% 19.8% 18.2% 47.6% 50.8% 28.8% 28.1%
Asian 55 32.3% 18.3% 0.0% 1.9% 1.8% 13.9% 30.9% 49.6% 67.3% 34.6%
Hispanic 297 0.8% -1.4% 5.7% 6.4% 27.6% 29.0% 47.5% 50.9% 19.2% 13.6%
Black 33 3.8% -4.1% 12.1% 8.3% 18.2% 29.9% 48.5% 47.7% 21.2% 14.1%
White 87 24.9% 17.8% 2.3% 2.8% 6.9% 13.5% 33.3% 48.4% 57.5% 35.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 118 -32.0% -39.9% 15.3% 17.8% 50.8% 56.2% 33.1% 25.2% 0.8% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 334 3.6% -2.0% 6.0% 7.2% 24.6% 28.9% 47.9% 49.7% 21.6% 14.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 329 2.5% 14.9% 5.2% 5.5% 37.7% 25.0% 45.9% 50.6% 11.2% 18.9%
Male 179 -0.5% 9.3% 5.0% 7.3% 40.8% 28.7% 40.2% 47.8% 14.0% 16.1%
Female 150 6.0% 20.8% 5.3% 3.5% 34.0% 21.1% 52.7% 53.5% 8.0% 21.9%
Asian 27 26.8% 26.4% 0.0% 2.8% 18.5% 16.2% 48.1% 52.6% 33.3% 28.5%
Hispanic 244 -6.3% 4.9% 6.6% 7.4% 45.1% 33.0% 43.0% 49.4% 5.3% 10.2%
Black 28 16.8% 1.0% 3.6% 10.5% 25.0% 33.8% 46.4% 45.2% 25.0% 10.4%
White 30 38.7% 25.2% 0.0% 2.9% 6.7% 17.2% 66.7% 52.7% 26.7% 27.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 26 -16.2% -30.9% 19.2% 25.0% 42.3% 51.2% 38.5% 22.0% 0.0% 1.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 146 -23.8% -30.2% 9.6% 18.0% 59.6% 57.5% 29.5% 23.9% 1.4% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 236 -0.9% 4.4% 5.9% 7.9% 40.3% 33.1% 46.2% 48.8% 7.6% 10.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 343 2.8% 9.6% 15.2% 10.2% 27.4% 25.5% 52.2% 52.2% 5.2% 12.0%
Male 184 -0.9% 3.3% 19.6% 13.9% 26.6% 28.1% 50.5% 49.0% 3.3% 8.9%
Female 159 7.0% 16.1% 10.1% 6.5% 28.3% 22.8% 54.1% 55.5% 7.5% 15.2%
Asian 18 12.0% 22.8% 11.1% 4.9% 22.2% 17.6% 55.6% 58.4% 11.1% 19.1%
Hispanic 263 -0.3% -2.6% 16.0% 14.7% 29.7% 33.3% 50.2% 46.6% 4.2% 5.5%
Black 32 23.5% -3.1% 3.1% 16.4% 18.8% 32.0% 71.9% 44.8% 6.3% 6.8%
White 27 4.6% 20.9% 22.2% 5.9% 18.5% 18.6% 51.9% 57.8% 7.4% 17.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -40.4% -35.0% 46.4% 39.4% 39.3% 41.0% 14.3% 18.8% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 151 -28.2% -34.2% 28.5% 31.3% 45.0% 48.3% 26.5% 20.0% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 343 2.8% -2.9% 15.2% 14.7% 27.4% 33.5% 52.2% 46.3% 5.2% 5.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 321 9.5% 21.2% 13.0% 8.5% 34.2% 27.0% 45.9% 50.5% 7.0% 14.0%
Male 170 7.6% 14.9% 15.6% 11.5% 33.5% 30.3% 46.1% 47.1% 4.8% 11.0%
Female 151 11.7% 27.9% 10.1% 5.3% 34.9% 23.5% 45.6% 54.1% 9.4% 17.2%
Asian 19 40.9% 35.2% 5.3% 4.4% 10.5% 17.1% 73.7% 57.2% 10.5% 21.2%
Hispanic 253 8.1% 8.4% 14.5% 12.7% 34.1% 35.6% 43.8% 45.5% 7.6% 6.2%
Black 25 6.7% 7.7% 4.2% 13.0% 45.8% 35.9% 45.8% 44.1% 4.2% 7.0%
White 23 0.2% 32.9% 13.0% 4.5% 43.5% 19.3% 43.5% 55.0% 0.0% 21.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 40 -30.5% -21.8% 35.9% 31.1% 51.3% 47.4% 12.8% 19.7% 0.0% 1.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 124 -17.7% -23.1% 24.0% 28.1% 50.4% 51.7% 25.6% 19.7% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 290 10.2% 8.7% 11.2% 12.0% 35.3% 36.0% 46.2% 45.8% 7.3% 6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 8 Students Tested: 444
This School:
99.5%Nevada:
99.5%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
27.2%Nevada:
27.6%
James Cashman Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : -16.1%State : -21.3%
Male
Here : -16.1%State : -26.7%
Female
This School : -16.2%State : -15.6%
Asian
This School : 17.4%Nevada : -4.8%
Hispanic
This School : -26.7%State : -32.5%
Black
Here : -34.9%Nevada : -38.1%
White
This School : 8.3%State : -9.3%
Two or more Races
Here : 11.9%Nevada : -12.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -54.3%State : -56.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -25.2%State : -32.6%
Detailed Students Results Percent of James Cashman Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 444 -16.1% -21.3% 27.2% 27.6% 23.1% 27.8% 23.8% 26.6% 26.0% 18.0%
Male 248 -16.1% -26.7% 30.4% 33.0% 19.8% 27.8% 23.5% 24.4% 26.3% 14.8%
Female 196 -16.2% -15.6% 23.1% 22.0% 27.2% 27.7% 24.1% 29.0% 25.6% 21.3%
Asian 48 17.4% -4.8% 10.4% 14.8% 6.3% 24.0% 14.6% 30.6% 68.8% 30.5%
Hispanic 283 -26.7% -32.5% 32.7% 35.4% 28.1% 31.2% 24.6% 23.3% 14.6% 10.1%
Black 29 -34.9% -38.1% 37.9% 41.3% 31.0% 30.9% 20.7% 19.7% 10.3% 8.1%
White 62 8.3% -9.3% 14.5% 19.3% 11.3% 24.1% 33.9% 30.8% 40.3% 25.9%
Two or more Races 18 11.9% -12.6% 11.1% 19.8% 11.1% 26.9% 11.1% 28.5% 66.7% 24.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 130 -54.3% -56.8% 59.7% 64.4% 28.7% 26.6% 10.1% 7.6% 1.6% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 344 -25.2% -32.6% 32.2% 36.1% 27.2% 30.6% 22.8% 22.8% 17.8% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 341 0.7% 0.1% 2.6% 3.7% 30.8% 30.4% 44.3% 44.0% 22.3% 22.0%
Male 173 4.6% -4.7% 1.7% 4.9% 27.7% 33.9% 43.9% 42.7% 26.6% 18.5%
Female 168 -3.4% 5.1% 3.6% 2.3% 33.9% 26.7% 44.6% 45.4% 17.9% 25.6%
Asian 30 7.4% 12.2% 0.0% 1.6% 26.7% 20.3% 40.0% 45.7% 33.3% 32.4%
Hispanic 242 -4.7% -10.1% 3.3% 5.1% 35.5% 39.1% 45.0% 42.6% 16.1% 13.2%
Black 30 4.1% -14.2% 0.0% 6.8% 30.0% 41.5% 46.7% 38.3% 23.3% 13.4%
White 39 26.4% 10.5% 2.6% 1.9% 5.1% 21.7% 41.0% 46.4% 51.3% 30.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 121 -19.6% -51.2% 5.8% 15.6% 47.9% 69.6% 40.5% 13.8% 5.8% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 263 -0.9% -11.1% 2.7% 5.5% 32.3% 39.8% 48.7% 41.9% 16.3% 12.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 322 5.6% 6.2% 6.8% 5.1% 32.9% 34.0% 53.7% 46.2% 6.5% 14.7%
Male 169 2.7% 0.3% 10.1% 7.2% 32.5% 37.9% 52.7% 43.6% 4.7% 11.4%
Female 153 8.7% 12.4% 3.3% 2.9% 33.3% 30.1% 54.9% 48.9% 8.5% 18.2%
Asian 22 18.1% 19.3% 4.5% 2.1% 22.7% 23.9% 54.5% 51.6% 18.2% 22.3%
Hispanic 242 3.6% -6.6% 6.6% 7.3% 35.1% 44.6% 53.7% 40.7% 4.5% 7.4%
Black 27 12.0% -7.5% 3.7% 8.5% 29.6% 44.3% 63.0% 40.1% 3.7% 7.1%
White 30 5.3% 18.0% 13.3% 2.9% 26.7% 24.5% 43.3% 51.2% 16.7% 21.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -14.7% -38.4% 24.0% 23.6% 36.0% 60.1% 40.0% 15.0% 0.0% 1.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 109 -5.1% -42.0% 12.8% 18.7% 37.6% 68.6% 48.6% 12.3% 0.9% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 232 10.4% -6.2% 6.0% 7.2% 28.9% 44.3% 56.9% 41.6% 8.2% 6.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 285 -9.8% -0.5% 9.5% 8.7% 45.6% 37.1% 36.8% 42.3% 8.1% 11.8%
Male 163 -9.9% -5.9% 11.0% 11.2% 44.2% 40.0% 36.2% 39.5% 8.6% 9.4%
Female 122 -9.6% 5.3% 7.4% 6.1% 47.5% 33.9% 37.7% 45.4% 7.4% 14.5%
Asian 22 4.4% 13.6% 13.6% 4.5% 27.3% 27.2% 50.0% 49.2% 9.1% 19.1%
Hispanic 217 -10.0% -15.2% 7.8% 12.9% 47.5% 47.6% 35.9% 34.2% 8.8% 5.3%
Black 23 -28.6% -17.3% 17.4% 15.0% 56.5% 47.6% 21.7% 32.4% 4.3% 5.0%
White 22 -0.1% 13.8% 13.6% 4.4% 31.8% 27.1% 50.0% 50.5% 4.5% 18.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -45.3% -41.4% 40.6% 34.0% 50.0% 52.7% 9.4% 12.3% 0.0% 0.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 103 -43.0% -45.7% 16.5% 31.6% 71.8% 59.5% 10.7% 8.5% 1.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 285 -9.8% -15.2% 9.5% 12.6% 45.6% 48.0% 36.8% 34.4% 8.1% 5.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 357 3.3% 13.6% 2.9% 7.3% 50.6% 35.9% 40.0% 44.3% 6.6% 12.5%
Male 183 -2.4% 7.9% 3.9% 9.8% 55.2% 39.0% 34.3% 41.3% 6.6% 9.9%
Female 174 9.4% 19.6% 1.8% 4.6% 45.6% 32.5% 46.2% 47.5% 6.5% 15.3%
Asian 32 9.8% 25.4% 9.4% 4.5% 37.5% 26.8% 40.6% 50.2% 12.5% 18.5%
Hispanic 258 -3.0% -1.9% 2.4% 10.9% 57.3% 47.7% 36.4% 36.2% 4.0% 5.2%
Black 28 13.8% -2.2% 0.0% 12.4% 42.9% 46.5% 46.4% 35.3% 10.7% 5.8%
White 36 33.2% 27.6% 2.9% 3.7% 20.6% 25.4% 58.8% 51.9% 17.6% 19.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 -25.1% -30.3% 0.0% 29.0% 81.8% 57.9% 18.2% 12.3% 0.0% 0.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 138 -22.7% -34.6% 4.4% 26.5% 75.0% 64.8% 20.6% 8.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 322 4.2% -0.8% 2.2% 10.1% 50.3% 47.4% 40.2% 37.0% 7.3% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 334 -16.7% 7.7% 15.9% 8.3% 57.5% 40.7% 21.9% 37.1% 4.8% 13.9%
Male 172 -20.0% 2.8% 20.3% 11.0% 56.4% 42.9% 19.8% 34.3% 3.5% 11.9%
Female 162 -13.1% 12.8% 11.1% 5.4% 58.6% 38.5% 24.1% 40.1% 6.2% 16.0%
Asian 19 25.1% 20.0% 5.3% 4.1% 26.3% 32.5% 47.4% 42.9% 21.1% 20.4%
Hispanic 244 -21.2% -8.2% 17.2% 12.1% 60.7% 52.9% 18.9% 28.9% 3.3% 6.2%
Black 40 -15.8% -8.8% 15.0% 14.7% 57.5% 50.8% 25.0% 28.0% 2.5% 6.5%
White 29 -5.4% 21.3% 10.3% 4.6% 51.7% 30.8% 27.6% 44.3% 10.3% 20.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 34 -37.4% -31.3% 38.2% 30.8% 55.9% 57.2% 5.9% 10.5% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 128 -37.8% -30.8% 26.6% 22.8% 68.0% 64.7% 5.5% 10.5% 0.0% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 244 -18.7% -7.7% 15.2% 12.5% 60.2% 51.9% 20.1% 29.5% 4.5% 6.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 401 -22.2% 7.6% 26.5% 10.6% 52.4% 38.6% 19.5% 38.0% 1.6% 12.8%
Male 206 -24.0% 3.3% 33.9% 13.1% 46.9% 40.3% 17.7% 36.0% 1.6% 10.6%
Female 194 -20.6% 12.5% 18.8% 7.6% 58.6% 36.6% 21.0% 40.4% 1.7% 15.3%
Asian 34 -12.0% 18.1% 6.3% 5.7% 62.5% 32.9% 25.0% 44.6% 6.3% 16.9%
Hispanic 267 -26.2% -11.3% 31.0% 17.5% 52.0% 50.5% 16.3% 27.2% 0.8% 4.8%
Black 40 -23.3% -10.9% 25.7% 17.9% 54.3% 49.7% 20.0% 27.4% 0.0% 5.0%
White 59 -10.0% 22.2% 18.5% 5.2% 48.1% 29.3% 31.5% 46.3% 1.9% 19.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -43.3% -29.7% 53.8% 36.4% 46.2% 50.1% 0.0% 12.0% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 132 -40.8% -32.0% 45.9% 29.8% 51.6% 59.0% 2.5% 10.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 274 -23.7% -9.3% 29.0% 16.8% 51.4% 49.2% 18.8% 28.5% 0.8% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 385 -7.9% 17.6% 20.7% 11.7% 55.1% 38.7% 21.0% 35.9% 3.2% 13.7%
Male 190 -12.5% 12.8% 26.3% 14.7% 54.2% 40.5% 16.8% 33.8% 2.6% 11.0%
Female 189 -2.8% 23.0% 15.7% 8.5% 55.1% 36.5% 25.4% 38.3% 3.8% 16.7%
Asian 38 4.8% 26.5% 10.5% 6.5% 52.6% 35.1% 23.7% 42.5% 13.2% 16.0%
Hispanic 226 -13.8% -1.7% 24.4% 17.9% 57.3% 51.7% 16.4% 25.5% 1.8% 4.9%
Black 45 -9.3% -2.1% 20.5% 20.2% 56.8% 49.9% 22.7% 25.0% 0.0% 4.9%
White 61 12.1% 31.8% 10.2% 7.1% 45.8% 29.2% 39.0% 43.3% 5.1% 20.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 43 -29.4% -20.7% 53.8% 39.2% 43.6% 49.5% 2.6% 10.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 135 -26.8% -23.2% 29.1% 30.1% 65.7% 61.1% 5.2% 8.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 249 -10.6% 0.0% 21.0% 18.1% 57.7% 49.9% 18.1% 26.8% 3.2% 5.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Las Vegas, NV
James Cashman Middle School in Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: