Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School in Dallas, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 100
Address
 1718 ROBERT B CULLUM BLVD
Dallas, TX 75210
Telephone
(972) 749-5200
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
100
Students
287
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
14.7
Free lunch eligible students
202
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
27
School district
DALLAS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
Yes
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

100
IRMA LERMA RANGEL YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SCHOOL (0.0 miles):

82
ST ANTHONY ACADEMY (0.7 miles):

67
ST ANTHONY SCHOOL (0.7 miles):

63
JOSEPH J RHOADS LEARNING CENTER (0.9 miles):

60
ORAN M ROBERTS EL (1.1 miles):

56
BILLY EARL DADE MIDDLE (0.7 miles):

20
JAMES MADISON H S (0.3 miles):

10
PAUL L DUNBAR LEARNING CENTER (0.6 miles):

10
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Dallas:

53
This School:

100

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 287
Enrollment in 2015: 283
Enrollment in 2014: 278
Enrollment in 2013: 292
Enrollment in 2012: 272
Enrollment in 2011: 215
Enrollment in 2010: 221

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students999890287
Female students999890287
Asian students1416
Hispanic students666763196
Black students16151647
White students13101033
Two or More Races students32 - 5

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 99
7th grade enrollment: 98
8th grade enrollment: 90

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 287 (100.0%)
Here:

100.0%
State:

49.0%

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 6 (2.1%)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

2.1%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 196 (68.3%)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

68.3%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 47 (16.4%)
School:

16.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 33 (11.5%)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

11.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (1.7%)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

1.7%
Texas:

2.1%

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 229 (79.8%)
School:

79.8%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 202 (70.4%)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

70.4%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 27 (9.4%)
Here:

9.4%
Texas:

6.2%

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 14.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1.4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 2.6
Number of FTE nurses: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

19.5
State:

15.6

Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $796,800
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 14.7 (Salary Expenditures: $547,536)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $25,346)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $128,165)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $95,753)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $324,094

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 38 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 38

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 5

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,038 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

2.0%
State:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 7th grade students retained
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

2.0%
Texas:

6.1%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic158
  • Asian5
  • Black32
  • White20
  • Multirace2
  • LEP35
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 217 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 158
  • Asian: 5
  • Black: 32
  • White: 20
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 35
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

756.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 3,456 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,998
  • Females4,998
  • Hispanic5,012
  • Black4,897
  • White4,992
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,998
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 87
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 87

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.7 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.4 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.9 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.6 (94%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 91%

9%
91%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,998, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 91%)
9%
91%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 5,012, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,897, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 91%)
9%
91%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,992, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,815
  • Females1,815
  • Hispanic1,808
  • Black1,911
Math Average Scale Score:

1,815
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 93
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.6 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 70%

2%
28%
70%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,815, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 70%)
2%
28%
70%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,808, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 67%)
2%
31%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,911, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,749
  • Females1,749
  • Hispanic1,741
  • Black1,804
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,749
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 93
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 93

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.8 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.6 (90%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 3%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 58%

3%
39%
58%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,749, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 58%)
3%
39%
58%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,741, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 59%)
2%
39%
59%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,804, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%
7th Grade
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,838
  • Females1,838
  • Hispanic1,825
  • Black1,841
  • White1,930
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,838
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 89
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 16.2 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.2 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 85%

2%
13%
85%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,838, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 85%)
2%
13%
85%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,825, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 85%)
3%
12%
85%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,841, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,930, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 91%)
9%
91%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,859
  • Females4,859
  • Hispanic4,778
  • Black4,953
  • White5,243
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,859
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 89
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 12.4 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 15.6 (91%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 1%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 74%

1%
25%
74%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,859, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 1%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 74%)
1%
25%
74%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,778, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 2%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 68%)
2%
30%
68%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,953, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
White: (Average Scale Score: 5,243, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 91%)
9%
91%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,880
  • Females1,880
  • Hispanic1,875
  • Black1,899
  • White1,917
Math Average Scale Score:

1,880
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 89
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 176

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.2 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.8 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 54%

6%
40%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,880, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 54%)
6%
40%
54%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,875, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 51%)
8%
41%
51%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,899, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 70%)
30%
70%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,917, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 73%)
27%
73%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,847
  • Females1,847
  • Hispanic1,830
  • Black1,849
  • White1,936
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,847
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 87
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 176

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 16.8 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 15.6 (92%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 3%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 77%

3%
20%
77%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,847, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 77%)
3%
20%
77%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,830, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 72%)
5%
23%
72%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,849, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,936, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,608
  • Females4,608
  • Hispanic4,568
  • Black4,587
  • White4,960
Science Average Scale Score:

4,608
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 89
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 176

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.6 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 67%

6%
27%
67%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,608, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 67%)
6%
27%
67%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,568, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 69%)
6%
25%
69%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,587, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,960, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,507
  • Females4,507
  • Hispanic4,479
  • Black4,455
  • White4,668
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

4,507
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 87
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 176

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 14.2 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.1 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 71%

13%
16%
71%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,507, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 71%)
13%
16%
71%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,479, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 72%)
10%
18%
72%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,455, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
18%
27%
55%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,668, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 83%)
17%
83%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

7.0
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 1 (all female)
  • Black: 1
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School:

3.5
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic62
  • Asian2
  • Black17
  • White11
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 92 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 62
  • Asian: 2
  • Black: 17
  • White: 11
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 87 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 61
  • Black: 16
  • White: 10
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

94.6%
State:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Dallas, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents