Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Idea Edinburg Academy School in Edinburg, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 89
Address
 2553 N ROEGIERS RD
Edinburg, TX 78541
Telephone
(956) 287-6100
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.ideapublicschools.org/Edinburg
City-data.com school rating
89
Students
746
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
29.1
Free lunch eligible students
501
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
101
School district
IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
AUSTIN ELEM (1.6 miles):

91
Idea Edinburg Academy School:

89
IDEA EDINBURG COLLEGE PREPARATORY (0.0 miles):

87
TRUMAN EL (0.6 miles):

84
EISENHOWER EL (1.4 miles):

81
LINCOLN EL (1.5 miles):

71
ELIAS LONGORIA SR MIDDLE (1.7 miles):

52
MEMORIAL MIDDLE (1.4 miles):

46
EDINBURG NORTH H S (0.7 miles):

41
Idea Edinburg Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Hidalgo County:

58
Edinburg:

70
Idea Edinburg Academy School:

89

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 746
Enrollment in 2015: 716
Enrollment in 2014: 624
Enrollment in 2013: 480
Enrollment in 2012: 336

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students123123124121126129746
Female students596951685967373
Male students645473536762373
Asian students - 3 - 1329
Hispanic students108114119116117122696
Black students2 - - - 2 - 4
White students136544537

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 123
1st grade enrollment: 123
2nd grade enrollment: 124
3rd grade enrollment: 121
4th grade enrollment: 126
5th grade enrollment: 129

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 373 (50.0%)
School:

50.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 373 (50.0%)
Idea Edinburg Academy School:

50.0%
State:

50.1%

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 9 (1.2%)
School:

1.2%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 696 (93.3%)
School:

93.3%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 37 (5.0%)
Here:

5.0%
State:

32.3%

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 602 (80.7%)
School:

80.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 501 (67.2%)
Idea Edinburg Academy School:

67.2%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 101 (13.5%)
Here:

13.5%
Texas:

6.2%

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 29.1

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 12.5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 25.7

Student/Teacher Ratio
Idea Edinburg Academy School:

25.7
State:

15.6

Idea Edinburg Academy School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,738,100
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 28.9 (Salary Expenditures: $1,211,331)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 10.6 (Salary Expenditures: $399,178)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $103,157)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $286,557)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $0
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,968,930
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,325,591
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11.6 (Salary Expenditures: $443,748)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $103,157)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $358,557)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 251 (male: 136, female: 115)
  • Hispanic: 241 (male: 131, female: 110)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 7, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 7, female: 13)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 11 (male: 4, female: 7)


Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

1.6%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

1.6%
State:

4.8%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,513
  • Males1,535
  • Females1,497
  • Hispanic1,508
  • White1,580
Math Average Scale Score:

1,513
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 108
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

8%
39%
28%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,535, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
7%
37%
23%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 19%)
10%
39%
32%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,508, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 23%)
9%
40%
28%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,458
  • Males1,473
  • Females1,447
  • Hispanic1,452
  • White1,523
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,458
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 108
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

13%
47%
16%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,473, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 29%)
9%
49%
13%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 21%)
16%
46%
17%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,452, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 22%)
14%
48%
16%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,523, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,595
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,602
  • Hispanic1,593
Math Average Scale Score:

1,595
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 115
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

9%
41%
21%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 28%)
13%
42%
17%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 30%)
2%
41%
27%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 27%)
9%
42%
22%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,581
  • Males1,548
  • Females1,635
  • Hispanic1,581
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,581
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 115
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

15%
26%
20%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 32%)
20%
29%
19%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 50%)
7%
20%
23%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 39%)
15%
26%
20%
39%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,918
  • Males3,809
  • Females4,094
  • Hispanic3,915
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,918
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 115
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.4 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

28%
29%
26%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,809, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 13%)
38%
25%
24%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,094, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 23%)
11%
34%
32%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,915, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
28%
30%
25%
17%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,708
  • Males1,701
  • Females1,714
  • Hispanic1,710
Math Average Scale Score:

1,708
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 118
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 118

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 53%

4%
15%
28%
53%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 56%)
10%
11%
23%
56%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,714, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 54%)
4%
15%
27%
54%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,630
  • Males1,620
  • Females1,638
  • Hispanic1,629
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,630
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 118
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 118

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

8%
24%
32%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 37%)
10%
19%
34%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 35%)
8%
27%
30%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 113, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 35%)
9%
23%
33%
35%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,023
  • Males4,039
  • Females4,009
  • Hispanic4,022
Science Average Scale Score:

4,023
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 118
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 118

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

9%
35%
30%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,039, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 29%)
10%
30%
31%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,009, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 24%)
9%
38%
29%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,022, Tested: 114, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 26%)
9%
36%
29%
26%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian2
  • LEP10
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 24 (male: 10, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

32.2
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 15 (male: 12, female: 3)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 11, female: 3)
  • White: 1 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 7, female: 1)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 11

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

14.7
Texas:

102.7

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Edinburg, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents