Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Howard Burnham Elementary School in El Paso, TX
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 78
Address
 7310 BISHOP FLORES DR
EL PASO, TX 79912
Telephone
(915) 584-9499
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.burnhamwood.org
City-data.com school rating
78
Students
540
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
27.3
Free lunch eligible students
217
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
56
School district
BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
POLK EL (1.0 miles):

95
KOHLBERG EL (1.3 miles):

78
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

78
GUERRERO EL (0.3 miles):

75
DAVINCI SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ARTS (0.9 miles):

67
FRANKLIN H S (0.3 miles):

61
BROWN MIDDLE (1.6 miles):

58
ROBERTS EL (1.1 miles):

53
PREMIER H S OF EL PASO (1.1 miles):

5
Howard Burnham Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
El Paso County:

54
El Paso:

56
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

78

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 540
Enrollment in 2015: 434
Enrollment in 2014: 428
Enrollment in 2013: 418
Enrollment in 2012: 404
Enrollment in 2011: 387
Enrollment in 2010: 389
Enrollment in 2009: 296
Enrollment in 2008: 257
Enrollment in 2007: 199
Enrollment in 2006: 261
Enrollment in 2005: 217
Enrollment in 2004: 220
Enrollment in 2003: 216
Enrollment in 2002: 156
Enrollment in 2001: 169
Enrollment in 2000: 115
Enrollment in 1999: 92

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students809387919693540
Female students464045534851283
Male students345342384842257
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 11 - - 2
Asian students21322212
Hispanic students628278778778464
Black students441 - 3315
White students10641131044
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - 1 - 1
Two or More Races students2 - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 80
1st grade enrollment: 93
2nd grade enrollment: 87
3rd grade enrollment: 91
4th grade enrollment: 96
5th grade enrollment: 93

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 283 (52.4%)
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

52.4%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 257 (47.6%)
School:

47.6%
State:

50.1%

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 12 (2.2%)
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

2.2%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 464 (85.9%)
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

85.9%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 15 (2.8%)
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

2.8%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 44 (8.1%)
School:

8.1%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

0.4%
Texas:

2.1%

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 273 (50.6%)
Here:

50.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 217 (40.2%)
Here:

40.2%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 56 (10.4%)
School:

10.4%
Texas:

6.2%

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 27.3

Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 2

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

19.8
Texas:

15.6

Howard Burnham Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $291,759
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 39 (Salary Expenditures: $1,165,342)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $16,608)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $119,964)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 16 (Salary Expenditures: $196,298)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $492,495
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,587,801
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,241,493
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $16,608)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $119,964)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 16 (Salary Expenditures: $196,298)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $585,749

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic151
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA13
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 161 (male: 89, female: 72)
  • Hispanic: 151 (male: 83, female: 68)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 11, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (male: 13, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic10
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

2.2%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

2.3%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

2.2%
State:

4.1%

    Total number of students retained in 5th grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Howard Burnham Elementary School:

4.3%
Texas:

4.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,539
  • Males1,546
  • Females1,533
  • Hispanic1,530
  • White1,616
Math Average Scale Score:

1,539
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 83
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 83

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

11%
25%
25%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 39%)
13%
20%
28%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,533, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 39%)
8%
31%
22%
39%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 35%)
10%
27%
28%
35%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,468
  • Males1,454
  • Females1,489
  • Hispanic1,456
  • White1,569
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,468
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 83
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 83

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

18%
31%
20%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,454, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 24%)
15%
39%
22%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 42%)
19%
23%
16%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 28%)
18%
34%
20%
28%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,621
  • Females1,592
  • Hispanic1,616
  • White1,544
Math Average Scale Score:

1,606
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 89
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

15%
25%
21%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 38%)
7%
29%
26%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 40%)
21%
24%
15%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 42%)
13%
24%
21%
42%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,563
  • Males1,549
  • Females1,575
  • Hispanic1,572
  • White1,470
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,563
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 89
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

17%
27%
20%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 33%)
19%
26%
22%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 38%)
15%
28%
19%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 40%)
14%
27%
19%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,470, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
50%
17%
33%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,019
  • Males3,938
  • Females4,092
  • Hispanic4,034
  • White3,788
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,019
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 89
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

17%
28%
43%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,938, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 7%)
14%
34%
45%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,092, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 17%)
19%
24%
40%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,034, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 14%)
17%
28%
41%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,788, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
33%
17%
50%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,647
  • Males1,654
  • Females1,646
  • Hispanic1,650
  • White1,648
Math Average Scale Score:

1,647
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 90
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

11%
27%
30%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 36%)
15%
23%
26%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 30%)
6%
30%
34%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 30%)
6%
28%
36%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 42%)
25%
17%
16%
42%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,596
  • Males1,565
  • Females1,625
  • Hispanic1,595
  • White1,630
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,596
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 91
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

13%
21%
36%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 18%)
21%
28%
33%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,625, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 39%)
6%
16%
39%
39%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,595, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 28%)
10%
22%
40%
28%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
8%
25%
34%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,773
  • Males3,789
  • Females3,775
  • Hispanic3,736
  • White3,887
Science Average Scale Score:

3,773
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 89
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

27%
45%
19%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,789, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 11%)
32%
39%
18%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,775, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 8%)
22%
50%
20%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,736, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 9%)
27%
49%
15%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,887, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
31%
38%
16%
15%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Science students tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,090 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

16.7
State:

159.6

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss El Paso, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents