Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Harmony Science Academy - Cedar Park School in Austin, TX
(Public • Regular School • Future)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 81
Address
12200 ANDERSON MILL RD
Austin, TX 78726
Telephone
(512) 284-9880
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
81
School district
HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (AUSTIN)
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Harmony Science Academy - Cedar Park School:

81
Harmony Science Academy - Cedar Park School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
This School:

81

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,533
  • Males1,540
  • Females1,520
  • Hispanic1,520
  • Asian1,574
  • Black1,443
  • White1,526
Math Average Scale Score:

1,533
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 75
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 75

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

13%
20%
28%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 43%)
14%
21%
22%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 31%)
12%
19%
38%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
14%
29%
14%
43%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 60%)
16%
8%
16%
60%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
27%
37%
27%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 29%)
7%
25%
39%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,474
  • Males1,473
  • Females1,477
  • Hispanic1,510
  • Asian1,502
  • Black1,398
  • White1,452
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,474
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 75
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 75

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 35%

17%
24%
24%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,473, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 37%)
14%
29%
20%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
23%
15%
31%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
29%
14%
14%
43%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 44%)
12%
16%
28%
44%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,398, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 18%)
36%
37%
9%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,452, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
14%
32%
33%
21%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,660
  • Males1,622
  • Females1,695
  • Hispanic1,613
  • Asian1,727
  • Black1,661
  • White1,628
Math Average Scale Score:

1,660
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 78
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

15%
16%
20%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 41%)
19%
19%
21%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 56%)
12%
12%
20%
56%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 36%)
21%
29%
14%
36%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 59%)
5%
13%
23%
59%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 47%)
12%
17%
24%
47%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 45%)
23%
9%
23%
45%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,540
  • Males1,504
  • Females1,572
  • Hispanic1,549
  • Asian1,615
  • Black1,484
  • White1,514
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,540
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 78
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

28%
16%
28%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 19%)
38%
16%
27%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 37%)
20%
14%
29%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 21%)
29%
14%
36%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 41%)
14%
9%
36%
41%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 6%)
35%
24%
35%
6%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 36%)
36%
14%
14%
36%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,765
  • Males3,595
  • Females3,926
  • Hispanic3,673
  • Asian4,031
  • Black3,633
  • White3,614
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,765
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 78
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

40%
16%
34%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,595, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 3%)
53%
15%
29%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,926, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 18%)
28%
18%
37%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,673, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 0%)
36%
28%
36%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,031, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 18%)
27%
9%
46%
18%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,633, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 6%)
50%
28%
16%
6%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,614, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 10%)
48%
9%
33%
10%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents