Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School in Euless, TX
(KG-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 58
Address
 701 S INDUSTRIAL BLVD STE 105
Euless, TX 76040
Telephone
(817) 554-2800
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.hsieuless.org
City-data.com school rating
58
Students
646
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
34.0
Free lunch eligible students
296
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
53
School district
HARMONY SCIENCE ACAD (WACO)
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
TREETOPS SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL (0.7 miles):

78
EULESS J H (0.9 miles):

75
WILSHIRE EL (0.7 miles):

73
SOUTH EULESS EL (1.0 miles):

68
HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY - EULESS (0.0 miles):

65
MIDWAY PARK EL (1.0 miles):

58
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

58
OAKWOOD TERRACE EL (0.3 miles):

57
TRINITY H S (1.0 miles):

57
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Tarrant County:

54
Euless:

64
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless:

58

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 646
Enrollment in 2015: 630

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students102110106110111107646
Female students405654523654292
Male students625452587553354
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1 - - - - 1
Asian students293633352926188
Hispanic students15121714141183
Black students253426344237198
White students252324202430146
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - 1 - 1
Two or More Races students84671329

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 102
1st grade enrollment: 110
2nd grade enrollment: 106
3rd grade enrollment: 110
4th grade enrollment: 111
5th grade enrollment: 107

Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 292 (45.2%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

45.2%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 354 (54.8%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

54.8%
Texas:

50.1%

Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

0.2%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 188 (29.1%)
School:

29.1%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 83 (12.8%)
Here:

12.8%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 198 (30.7%)
School:

30.7%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 146 (22.6%)
Here:

22.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

0.2%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 29 (4.5%)
School:

4.5%
Texas:

2.1%

Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 349 (54.0%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

54.0%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 296 (45.8%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

45.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 53 (8.2%)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

8.2%
State:

6.2%

Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 34

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 5

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

19.0
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,235,093
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 36 (Salary Expenditures: $1,964,400)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $52,968)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $217,725)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,085,983
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $236,615
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,964,400
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $99,419)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $137,196)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,420,251

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian55
  • Black34
  • White28
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA19
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 141 (male: 86, female: 55)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Asian: 55 (male: 35, female: 20)
  • Black: 34 (male: 20, female: 14)
  • White: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • Black11
  • White13
  • LEP17
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
  • White: 13 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (male: 13, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic2
  • Black4
  • White5
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

2.0%
State:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

3.6%
State:

6.1%

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • White2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

5.7%
Texas:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

1.9%
State:

4.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian31
  • Black10
  • White13
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 62 (male: 34, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
  • Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

96.0
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,492
  • Males1,479
  • Females1,504
  • Hispanic1,487
  • Asian1,537
  • Black1,465
  • White1,469
Math Average Scale Score:

1,492
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 111
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

14%
36%
27%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 14%)
13%
43%
31%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
15%
29%
23%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
7%
36%
43%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 38%)
13%
25%
25%
38%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,465, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 19%)
16%
43%
22%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 17%)
17%
35%
31%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,455
  • Males1,428
  • Females1,482
  • Hispanic1,449
  • Asian1,505
  • Black1,416
  • White1,449
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,455
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 111
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

24%
30%
17%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,428, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 23%)
34%
28%
15%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,482, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 35%)
15%
30%
20%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,449, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
14%
43%
29%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,505, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 38%)
19%
15%
28%
38%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,416, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 25%)
34%
35%
6%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,449, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 31%)
24%
31%
14%
31%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,563
  • Males1,559
  • Females1,566
  • Hispanic1,539
  • Asian1,622
  • Black1,552
  • White1,525
  • Multirace1,579
Math Average Scale Score:

1,563
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 104
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

24%
30%
18%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 27%)
25%
29%
19%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 29%)
23%
31%
17%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,539, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 26%)
37%
21%
16%
26%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 38%)
8%
30%
24%
38%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 31%)
23%
39%
7%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 16%)
32%
28%
24%
16%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
29%
28%
14%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,520
  • Males1,500
  • Females1,537
  • Hispanic1,472
  • Asian1,538
  • Black1,530
  • White1,505
  • Multirace1,616
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,520
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 104
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

28%
32%
14%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
27%
40%
16%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 34%)
29%
25%
12%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,472, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 16%)
37%
26%
21%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 27%)
19%
39%
15%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 27%)
35%
23%
15%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,505, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 24%)
32%
32%
12%
24%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 57%)
43%
57%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,813
  • Males3,689
  • Females3,917
  • Hispanic3,628
  • Asian4,042
  • Black3,813
  • White3,677
  • Multirace3,988
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,813
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 103
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

33%
25%
30%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,689, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 9%)
45%
21%
25%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,917, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 14%)
23%
29%
34%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,628, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 0%)
42%
26%
32%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,042, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 15%)
15%
16%
54%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,813, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 15%)
31%
42%
12%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,677, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
50%
12%
25%
13%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,988, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
14%
43%
29%
14%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,688
  • Males1,678
  • Females1,696
  • Hispanic1,594
  • Asian1,776
  • Black1,669
  • White1,640
  • Multirace1,762
Math Average Scale Score:

1,688
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 105
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

10%
25%
25%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 36%)
13%
30%
21%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
7%
22%
28%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 15%)
23%
23%
39%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,776, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 64%)
18%
18%
64%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 35%)
15%
23%
27%
35%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 26%)
9%
43%
22%
26%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,762, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 57%)
14%
29%
57%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,604
  • Males1,583
  • Females1,622
  • Hispanic1,521
  • Asian1,676
  • Black1,571
  • White1,573
  • Multirace1,742
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,604
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 106
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 35%

19%
20%
26%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
27%
15%
25%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
12%
24%
28%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
38%
31%
23%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 61%)
7%
11%
21%
61%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,571, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 18%)
21%
26%
35%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 29%)
25%
17%
29%
29%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,742, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,835
  • Males3,842
  • Females3,829
  • Hispanic3,536
  • Asian4,088
  • Black3,696
  • White3,830
  • Multirace4,076
Science Average Scale Score:

3,835
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 106
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

25%
35%
29%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,842, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 13%)
21%
35%
31%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,829, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 10%)
28%
36%
26%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,536, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 8%)
46%
39%
7%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,088, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 26%)
15%
22%
37%
26%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,696, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 0%)
29%
45%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,830, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
25%
37%
25%
13%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,076, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 13%)
37%
50%
13%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,671
  • Males1,678
  • Females1,658
  • Hispanic1,584
  • Asian1,749
  • Black1,630
  • White1,683
Math Average Scale Score:

1,671
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 105
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

15%
32%
26%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
15%
28%
28%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 22%)
16%
38%
24%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 0%)
31%
46%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,749, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 41%)
18%
41%
41%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 19%)
16%
53%
12%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,683, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 31%)
19%
17%
33%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,597
  • Males1,606
  • Females1,581
  • Hispanic1,567
  • Asian1,659
  • Black1,543
  • White1,615
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,597
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 104
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

27%
29%
29%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 16%)
24%
25%
35%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
32%
36%
18%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
31%
38%
16%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 27%)
9%
18%
46%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
47%
28%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 20%)
20%
31%
29%
20%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

1.5
Texas:

0.4
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian10
  • Black7
  • White16
  • Multirace4
  • LEP10
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 47 (male: 25, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

72.8
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

3.1
Texas:

3.0
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

3.1
State:

6.8

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic3
  • Asian1
  • Black8
  • White5
  • LEP6
  • IDEA8
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 17 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 3
  • Asian: 1
  • Black: 8
  • White: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 6
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 8
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 40

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School:

61.9
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Asian4
  • Black10
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 18 (male: 14, female: 4)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Asian: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Euless, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Euless main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Harmony Of Innovation- Euless School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents