Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Granger School in Granger, TX
(PK-12 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 64
Address
 300 N COLORADO ST
Granger, TX 76530
Telephone
(512) 859-2173
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.esc13.net/granger
City-data.com school rating
64
Students
406
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
37.0
Free lunch eligible students
191
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
42
School district
GRANGER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HOLLAND EL (11.1 miles):

92
HOLLAND MIDDLE (11.0 miles):

73
HOLLAND H S (11.2 miles):

66
Granger School:

64
MAIN STREET INT (8.8 miles):

44
TAYLOR H S (11.8 miles):

44
TAYLOR MIDDLE (8.4 miles):

21
NAOMI PASEMANN EL (9.1 miles):

19
BARTLETT SCHOOLS (5.4 miles):

16
Granger School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Williamson County:

63
Granger:

64
Granger School:

64

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 406
Enrollment in 2015: 426
Enrollment in 2014: 421
Enrollment in 2013: 412
Enrollment in 2012: 410
Enrollment in 2011: 415
Enrollment in 2010: 427
Enrollment in 2009: 448
Enrollment in 2008: 472
Enrollment in 2007: 470
Enrollment in 2006: 481
Enrollment in 2005: 461
Enrollment in 2004: 462
Enrollment in 2003: 468
Enrollment in 2002: 434
Enrollment in 2001: 403
Enrollment in 2000: 405
Enrollment in 1999: 407

Granger School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08G09G10G11G12Total
All students1933323323213326272930334027406
Female students721151611815101315915127174
Male students1212171712131816141421182820232
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11
Hispanic students7172016149121111121515194182
Black students - - - - - 221211 - - - 9
White students121512179101913131614172021208
Two or More Races students - 1 - - - - - 11 - - 1116

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 19
Kindergarten enrollment: 33
1st grade enrollment: 32
2nd grade enrollment: 33
3rd grade enrollment: 23
4th grade enrollment: 21
5th grade enrollment: 33
6th grade enrollment: 26
7th grade enrollment: 27
8th grade enrollment: 29
9th grade enrollment: 30
10th grade enrollment: 33
11th grade enrollment: 40
12th grade enrollment: 27

Granger School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 174 (42.9%)
School:

42.9%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 232 (57.1%)
Here:

57.1%
State:

50.1%

Granger School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
School:

0.2%
State:

0.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 182 (44.8%)
Here:

44.8%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 9 (2.2%)
Here:

2.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 208 (51.2%)
Here:

51.2%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (1.5%)
School:

1.5%
State:

2.1%

Granger School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 233 (57.4%)
School:

57.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 191 (47.0%)
School:

47.0%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 42 (10.3%)
Here:

10.3%
Texas:

6.2%

Granger School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 37

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

11.0
Texas:

15.6

Granger School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,816,435
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 37 (Salary Expenditures: $1,351,126)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $33,485)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $152,527)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $279,297)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,000,432
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,091,534
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,536,679
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $103,495)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $152,527)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $298,833)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,261,791

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 44 (male: 22, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 40 (male: 20, female: 20)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 38 (male: 27, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 17 (male: 10, female: 7)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 29 (male: 19, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,844 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in Kindergarten

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

12.1%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Granger School:

8.7%
Texas:

4.1%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

17.2
Texas:

79.4

Dual Enrollment:
(State average from 1,381 schools)
This school has students in grades 9-12 enrolled in a dual enrollment / dual credit program
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs provide opportunities for high school students to take college-level courses offered by colleges, and earn concurrent credit toward a high school diploma and a college degree while still in high school.These programs are for high school - enrolled students who are academically prepared to enroll in college and are interested in taking on additional coursework.For example, students who want to study subjects not offered at their high school may seek supplemental education at colleges nearby.

    Dual Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
Dual Enrollment: 34 (male: 27, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Dual Enrollment per 1,000 students
Granger School:

83.7
Texas:

133.0

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,130
  • Males4,123
  • Females4,142
  • Hispanic3,909
  • White4,353
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,130
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 31
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 4.7 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

10%
29%
32%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,123, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 32%)
11%
26%
31%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,142, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 25%)
8%
34%
33%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,909, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 7%)
7%
43%
43%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,353, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 50%)
13%
13%
25%
50%

    Biology Average Scale Score

  • All4,005
  • Males4,073
  • Females3,904
  • Hispanic3,874
  • White4,141
Biology Average Scale Score:

4,005
Texas:

3,772
Biology students tested: 32
Biology # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Biology Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7.2 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

13%
29%
46%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,073, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 16%)
11%
21%
52%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,904, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 8%)
15%
39%
38%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,874, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 6%)
19%
37%
38%
6%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,141, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 53%, Masters: 20%)
7%
20%
53%
20%

    English I Average Scale Score

  • All4,076
  • Males4,048
  • Females4,126
  • Hispanic4,002
  • White4,176
English I Average Scale Score:

4,076
Texas:

3,637
English I students tested: 36
English I # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

English I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.5 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 6.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 7 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

28%
19%
39%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,048, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 9%)
30%
18%
43%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,126, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 23%)
23%
23%
31%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,002, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 12%)
29%
24%
35%
12%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,176, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 18%)
29%
6%
47%
18%

    English II Average Scale Score

  • All4,051
  • Males3,967
  • Females4,151
  • Hispanic3,831
  • White4,251
English II Average Scale Score:

4,051
State:

3,718
English II students tested: 35
English II # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

English II Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 6.2 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 51%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

29%
14%
51%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,967, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 48%, Masters: 5%)
32%
15%
48%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,151, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 6%)
25%
12%
57%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,831, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
53%
7%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,251, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 61%, Masters: 11%)
6%
22%
61%
11%

    U.S. History Average Scale Score

  • All4,204
  • Males4,205
  • Females4,203
  • Hispanic4,039
  • White4,543
U.S. History Average Scale Score:

4,204
State:

3,953
U.S. History students tested: 32
U.S. History # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

U.S. History Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 20.3 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 12.6 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

9%
25%
38%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,205, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 27%)
9%
23%
41%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,203, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
10%
30%
30%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,039, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 7%)
7%
40%
46%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,543, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 57%)
7%
36%
57%
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,414
  • Males1,425
  • Females1,402
  • Hispanic1,372
  • White1,488
Math Average Scale Score:

1,414
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 44
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

34%
32%
23%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,425, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 13%)
26%
35%
26%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,402, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 10%)
43%
28%
19%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,372, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 7%)
46%
36%
11%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 19%)
13%
25%
44%
19%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,415
  • Males1,409
  • Females1,422
  • Hispanic1,386
  • White1,466
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,415
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 44
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

25%
36%
23%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,409, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 13%)
22%
39%
26%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,422, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
29%
33%
19%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,386, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 11%)
36%
35%
18%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
6%
38%
31%
25%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,540
  • Females1,554
  • Hispanic1,478
  • White1,610
Math Average Scale Score:

1,547
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 42
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

21%
46%
12%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 19%)
24%
43%
14%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 24%)
19%
48%
9%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 0%)
42%
47%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 41%)
5%
40%
14%
41%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,516
  • Males1,497
  • Females1,535
  • Hispanic1,451
  • White1,579
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,516
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 42
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

31%
26%
19%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 24%)
33%
24%
19%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,535, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 24%)
29%
28%
19%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 11%)
58%
21%
10%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
5%
31%
28%
36%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,664
  • Males3,495
  • Females3,833
  • Hispanic3,352
  • White3,938
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,664
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 42
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

48%
16%
31%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,495, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 0%)
62%
14%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,833, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 10%)
33%
19%
38%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,352, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 68%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
68%
11%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,938, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 9%)
32%
18%
41%
9%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,584
  • Males1,612
  • Females1,559
  • Hispanic1,565
  • White1,613
Math Average Scale Score:

1,584
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 26
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 26

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 58%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

15%
58%
12%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
8%
59%
16%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 14%)
21%
58%
7%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 7%)
20%
53%
20%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 30%)
10%
60%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,495
  • Males1,481
  • Females1,506
  • Hispanic1,477
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,495
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 26
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 26

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.6 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

42%
31%
15%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 8%)
42%
41%
9%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
43%
21%
22%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 7%)
53%
34%
6%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
30%
30%
20%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,715
  • Males3,866
  • Females3,586
  • Hispanic3,546
  • White3,933
Science Average Scale Score:

3,715
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 26
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 26

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.3 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

31%
42%
15%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,866, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 17%)
17%
58%
8%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,586, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
43%
28%
22%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,546, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
47%
33%
13%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,933, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 20%)
10%
60%
10%
20%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,573
  • Males1,577
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,559
  • White1,594
Math Average Scale Score:

1,573
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 23
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.8 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (36%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 65%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

22%
65%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 75%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
17%
75%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
27%
55%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
36%
55%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 82%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
82%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,499
  • Males1,509
  • Females1,487
  • Hispanic1,463
  • White1,538
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,499
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 23
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 23

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (44%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

65%
31%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
58%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
73%
18%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 82%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
82%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
45%
46%
9%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,667
  • Males1,702
  • Females1,634
  • Hispanic1,632
  • White1,693
Math Average Scale Score:

1,667
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 39
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

28%
28%
26%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 26%)
16%
31%
27%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 10%)
40%
25%
25%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
36%
35%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
22%
26%
22%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,677
  • Males1,701
  • Females1,654
  • Hispanic1,660
  • White1,694
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,677
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.4 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

15%
29%
28%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
11%
21%
36%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 25%)
20%
35%
20%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
14%
43%
14%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 30%)
13%
22%
35%
30%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,757
  • Males3,831
  • Females3,687
  • Hispanic3,585
  • White3,881
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,757
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 39
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

33%
23%
36%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,831, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 16%)
32%
21%
31%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,687, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
35%
25%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,585, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 7%)
43%
21%
29%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,881, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 9%)
26%
22%
43%
9%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,724
  • Males1,747
  • Females1,699
  • Hispanic1,684
  • White1,762
Math Average Scale Score:

1,724
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 29
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 29

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.8 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

17%
24%
42%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,747, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 33%)
20%
20%
27%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 0%)
14%
29%
57%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 9%)
18%
37%
36%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,762, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
14%
15%
42%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,739
  • Males1,714
  • Females1,766
  • Hispanic1,735
  • White1,725
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,739
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 29
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 29

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.4 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.2 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

7%
24%
38%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,714, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 27%)
13%
27%
33%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,766, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 36%)
21%
43%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,735, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
9%
27%
28%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 29%)
7%
29%
35%
29%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,906
  • Males4,004
  • Females3,801
  • Hispanic3,683
  • White4,077
Science Average Scale Score:

3,906
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 29
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 29

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

21%
45%
20%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,004, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 27%)
20%
40%
13%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,801, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
21%
50%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,683, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,077, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
14%
43%
14%
29%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,534
  • Males3,524
  • Females3,545
  • Hispanic3,542
  • White3,495
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,534
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 29
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 29

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.5 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

52%
34%
11%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,524, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
60%
27%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,545, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 7%)
43%
43%
7%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,542, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
45%
46%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,495, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
57%
29%
14%

Accountability


SAT/ACT:
Show data for

(State average from 1,567 schools)
The ACT Test (ACT) is a nationally recognized assessment used to indicate college readiness.
The SAT Reasoning Test (SAT) is a curriculum-based, college readiness test that assesses the academic skills and knowledge students acquire in high school and the ability to apply that knowledge.

Granger School - ACT/SAT scores

    Average ACT composite score

  • All19.2
  • Hispanic20.0
  • White18.8
Percent of graduates taking the ACT:

14.6%
Texas:

41.3%
ACT composite scores above criteria:

16.7%
State:

21.8%
Number of graduates: <50
Number of graduates taking the ACT: <25

Average ACT composite score:

19.2
State:

18.9
Average ACT English score:

17.5
State:

17.8
Average ACT mathematics score:

19.8
State:

19.1
Average ACT reading score:

18.2
Texas:

19.3
Average ACT science score:

20.0
Texas:

19.2

    Average SAT combined score

  • All978
  • Hispanic1,095
  • White958
Percent of graduates taking the SAT:

34.1%
State:

45.4%
SAT combined scores above criteria:

14.3%
State:

19.5%
Number of graduates: <50
Number of graduates taking the SAT: <25

Average SAT critical reading and mathematics combined score:

978
Texas:

875
Average SAT mathematics score:

492
Texas:

443
Average SAT critical reading score:

486
State:

432
Average SAT writing score:

461
State:

415
SAT or ACT Test Participation: 9 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 5
  • Two or More Races: 2

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Here:

4.9
Texas:

30.4
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Granger School:

4.9
State:

16.6

Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 1
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 1
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic22
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace4
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
  • 5047
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 41 (male: 26, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Granger School:

101.0
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 17 (male: 15, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 8 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 5

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Expulsion without educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and not providing educational services to the child for the remainder of the school year or longer in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion without services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services per 1,000 students
School:

19.7
Texas:

4.3
Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services per 1,000 students
Granger School:

9.9
Texas:

0.3

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,490 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 2
Number of Algebra I classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    9-10th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic13
  • Black4
  • White16
  • LEP2
  • IDEA4
9-10th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 33 (male: 21, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
9-10th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Percent of 9-10th grade students who passed
Granger School:

75.8%
Texas:

77.3%

Algebra II:
Show data for
Algebra II (college-preparatory) course topics typically include field properties and theorems; set theory; operations with rational and irrational expressions; factoring of rational expressions; in - depth study of linear equations and inequalities; quadratic equations; solving systems of linear and quadratic equations; graphing of constant, linear, and quadratic equations; properties of higher degree equations; and operations with rational and irrational exponents.
Number of Algebra II classes: 2
Number of Algebra II classes taught by certified teachers: 2

Student Enrollment in Algebra II: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Geometry:
Show data for
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
Number of Geometry classes: 2
Number of Geometry classes taught by certified teachers: 2

Student Enrollment in Geometry: 35 (male: 19, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Advanced Mathematics:
Show data for
Advanced mathematics (college-preparatory) courses cover the following topics: trigonometry, trigonometry/algebra, trigonometry / analytic geometry, trigonometry / math analysis, analytic geometry, math analysis, math analysis / analytic geometry, probability and statistics, and precalculus
Number of Advanced Mathematics classes: 2
Number of Advanced Mathematics classes taught by certified teachers: 2

Student Enrollment in Advanced Mathematics: 19 (male: 12, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Biology:
Show data for
Biology (college-preparatory) courses are designed to provide information regarding the fundamental concepts of life and life processes.These courses include(but are not restricted to) such topics as cell structure and function, general plant and animal physiology, genetics, and taxonomy.
Number of Biology classes: 2
Number of Biology classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    Student Enrollment in Biology

  • Hispanic16
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA4
Student Enrollment in Biology: 33 (male: 23, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Chemistry:
Show data for
Chemistry (college-preparatory) courses involve studying the composition, properties, and reactions of substances. These courses typically explore such concepts as the behaviors of solids, liquids, and gases; acid / base and oxidation / reduction reactions; and atomic structure.Chemical formulas and equations and nuclear reactions are also studied.
Number of Chemistry classes: 2
Number of Chemistry classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    Student Enrollment in Chemistry

  • Hispanic16
  • White16
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Chemistry: 32 (male: 13, female: 19)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Physics:
Show data for
Physics (college-preparatory) courses involve the study of the forces and laws of nature affecting matter, such as equilibrium, motion, momentum, and the relationships between matter and energy.The study of physics includes examination of sound, light, and magnetic and electric phenomena.
Number of Physics classes: 3
Number of Physics classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    Student Enrollment in Physics

  • Hispanic13
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA5
Student Enrollment in Physics: 37 (male: 27, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Granger, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Granger main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Granger School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents