Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School in Flower Mound, TX
(KG-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 97
Address
 500 PARKER SQUARE
Flower Mound, TX 75028
Telephone
(972) 316-3663
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
97
Students
323
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
15.5
Free lunch eligible students
12
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
7
School district
TEXAS COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMIES
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
FOREST VISTA EL (1.4 miles):

97
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School:

97
PRAIRIE TRAIL ELEMENTARY (1.5 miles):

95
LAMAR MIDDLE (0.9 miles):

93
FORESTWOOD MIDDLE (1.1 miles):

90
TIMBER CREEK EL (0.6 miles):

86
MARJORY VICKERY EL (0.9 miles):

59
DEGAN EL (0.8 miles):

55
HUFFINES MIDDLE (1.5 miles):

44
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Denton County:

69
Flower Mound:

93
This School:

97

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 323

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students595054535354323
Female students282626242731162
Male students312428292623161
Asian students651476442
Hispanic students48358331
Black students42556527
White students392927342636191
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - 1 - - - 1
Two or More Races students66427631

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 59
1st grade enrollment: 50
2nd grade enrollment: 54
3rd grade enrollment: 53
4th grade enrollment: 53
5th grade enrollment: 54

Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 162 (50.2%)
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School:

50.2%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 161 (49.8%)
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School:

49.8%
Texas:

50.1%

Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 42 (13.0%)
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School:

13.0%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 31 (9.6%)
Here:

9.6%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 27 (8.4%)
School:

8.4%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 191 (59.1%)
Here:

59.1%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.3%)
School:

0.3%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 31 (9.6%)
Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School:

9.6%
Texas:

2.1%

Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 19 (5.9%)
School:

5.9%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 12 (3.7%)
Here:

3.7%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 7 (2.2%)
School:

2.2%
Texas:

6.2%

Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 15.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 9
Number of FTE school counselors: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

20.8
State:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $725,393
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 10 (Salary Expenditures: $377,742)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6.2 (Salary Expenditures: $119,552)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.5 (Salary Expenditures: $7,380)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $199,736)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $863,343
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $752,307
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $377,742
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7.4 (Salary Expenditures: $143,511)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.5 (Salary Expenditures: $7,380)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $199,736)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $887,110

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,479
  • Males1,509
  • Females1,453
  • Hispanic1,437
  • Asian1,525
  • White1,483
  • Multirace1,489
Math Average Scale Score:

1,479
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 53
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

17%
36%
24%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 40%)
16%
32%
12%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,453, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 7%)
18%
39%
36%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
14%
57%
15%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
8%
34%
25%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 20%)
16%
36%
28%
20%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
14%
29%
28%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,450
  • Males1,464
  • Females1,438
  • Hispanic1,415
  • Asian1,458
  • White1,467
  • Multirace1,448
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,450
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 53
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

11%
44%
26%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,464, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 28%)
12%
36%
24%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,438, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 11%)
11%
50%
28%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,415, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
29%
42%
29%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,458, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
58%
25%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 24%)
8%
36%
32%
24%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,448, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
14%
43%
14%
29%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,642
  • Males1,679
  • Females1,605
  • Asian1,748
  • Black1,475
  • White1,615
Math Average Scale Score:

1,642
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 51
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

14%
17%
28%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 52%)
4%
16%
28%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 31%)
23%
19%
27%
31%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 74%)
5%
21%
74%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,475, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 27%)
9%
27%
37%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,567
  • Males1,594
  • Females1,542
  • Asian1,631
  • Black1,469
  • White1,554
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,567
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 51
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

16%
23%
28%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 48%)
16%
8%
28%
48%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 19%)
15%
39%
27%
19%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 53%)
5%
16%
26%
53%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 23%)
9%
27%
41%
23%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,218
  • Males4,232
  • Females4,205
  • Asian4,352
  • Black3,896
  • White4,280
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,218
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 50
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.3 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 48%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

4%
24%
48%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,232, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 25%)
4%
17%
54%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,205, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 23%)
4%
31%
42%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,352, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 32%)
16%
52%
32%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,896, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,280, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 23%)
23%
54%
23%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,682
  • Males1,660
  • Females1,704
  • Asian1,759
  • White1,672
Math Average Scale Score:

1,682
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 50
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

4%
20%
40%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 32%)
4%
20%
44%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,704, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 40%)
4%
20%
36%
40%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,759, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 55%, Masters: 45%)
55%
45%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 39%)
3%
26%
32%
39%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,664
  • Males1,656
  • Females1,672
  • Asian1,684
  • White1,670
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,664
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 50

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.1 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 47%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

2%
10%
47%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 64%, Masters: 28%)
8%
64%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 54%)
4%
13%
29%
54%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 55%)
45%
55%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,670, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 40%)
3%
7%
50%
40%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,079
  • Males4,054
  • Females4,103
  • Hispanic3,753
  • Asian4,285
  • White4,039
Science Average Scale Score:

4,079
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 51
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.7 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

10%
25%
41%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,054, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 24%)
8%
24%
44%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,103, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 23%)
12%
26%
39%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,753, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
40%
20%
40%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,285, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 33%)
17%
50%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,039, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 23%)
10%
29%
38%
23%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,659
  • Males1,669
  • Females1,649
  • Hispanic1,636
  • Asian1,699
  • White1,659
Math Average Scale Score:

1,659
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 45
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 51%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

51%
40%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 14%)
48%
38%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,649, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 4%)
54%
42%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 13%)
37%
50%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 9%)
45%
46%
9%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,684
  • Males1,671
  • Females1,695
  • Hispanic1,673
  • Asian1,719
  • White1,682
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,684
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.1 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.8 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

8%
19%
26%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
5%
27%
36%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 59%)
11%
11%
19%
59%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
22%
11%
67%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,719, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 33%)
67%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 52%)
8%
24%
16%
52%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,750
  • Males1,722
  • Females1,773
  • White1,760
Math Average Scale Score:

1,750
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 25
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

4%
32%
24%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,722, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 27%)
55%
18%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,773, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 50%)
7%
14%
29%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,760, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 47%)
7%
26%
20%
47%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,757
  • Males1,715
  • Females1,784
  • Asian1,851
  • White1,773
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,757
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 38
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.6 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.9 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 63%

5%
24%
8%
63%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 47%)
7%
33%
13%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,784, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 74%)
4%
18%
4%
74%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,851, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,773, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 73%)
5%
9%
13%
73%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,342
  • Males3,989
  • Females4,582
  • Asian4,814
  • White4,436
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,342
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 37
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 38

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.1 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

16%
11%
27%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,989, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
33%
7%
40%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,582, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 64%)
5%
13%
18%
64%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,814, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 71%)
29%
71%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,436, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 52%)
10%
9%
29%
52%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,830
  • Females1,806
  • White1,843
Math Average Scale Score:

1,830
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 13
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.1 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.1 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 8%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 54%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

8%
54%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,806, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 33%)
11%
56%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,843, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 43%)
14%
43%
43%
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

40.2
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic16
  • Asian11
  • Black12
  • White40
  • Multirace21
  • IDEA12
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 100 (male: 88, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 15, female: 1)
  • Asian: 11 (all male)
  • Black: 12 (male: 6, female: 6)
  • White: 40 (male: 35, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 21 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 12 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 50

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

154.8
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White4
  • Multirace2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 8, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

    Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White10
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 6

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

18.6
Texas:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Expulsion without educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and not providing educational services to the child for the remainder of the school year or longer in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion without services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services per 1,000 students
School:

6.2
Texas:

2.0

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Flower Mound, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Flower Mound main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Founders Classical Academy Of Flower Mound School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents