Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Catherine Bell Elementary School in Little Elm, TX
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 48
Address
 601 VILLA PALOMA BLVD
Little Elm, TX 75068
Telephone
(972) 347-7200
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.dentonisd.org
City-data.com school rating
48
School district
DENTON ISD
Charter school
No
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MILLER EL (2.0 miles):

82
SAVANNAH EL (1.3 miles):

73
PROVIDENCE EL (2.1 miles):

72
NAVO MIDDLE (1.0 miles):

71
CESAR CHAVEZ EL (2.7 miles):

66
PALOMA CREEK EL (1.1 miles):

65
LITTLE ELM H S (2.6 miles):

54
RAY E BRASWELL H S (0.4 miles):

52
Catherine Bell Elementary School:

48
Catherine Bell Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Denton County:

69
Little Elm:

62
Catherine Bell Elementary School:

48

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,454
  • Males1,444
  • Females1,465
  • Hispanic1,443
  • Asian1,476
  • Black1,419
  • White1,497
Math Average Scale Score:

1,454
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 134
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 134

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

22%
38%
25%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 12%)
25%
35%
28%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,465, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 18%)
20%
39%
23%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 9%)
18%
49%
24%
9%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 13%)
13%
25%
50%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,419, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 13%)
36%
33%
18%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 22%)
13%
34%
31%
22%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,420
  • Males1,400
  • Females1,444
  • Hispanic1,428
  • Asian1,391
  • Black1,384
  • White1,457
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,420
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 134
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 134

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

27%
39%
18%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,400, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 12%)
32%
42%
14%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
21%
35%
23%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,428, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
27%
31%
21%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,391, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 63%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
13%
63%
25%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,384, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 11%)
38%
35%
16%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,457, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 22%)
18%
42%
18%
22%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,521
  • Males1,525
  • Females1,517
  • Hispanic1,522
  • Asian1,654
  • Black1,451
  • White1,591
Math Average Scale Score:

1,521
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 121
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

40%
23%
16%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 20%)
37%
20%
23%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 21%)
43%
26%
10%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 11%)
32%
36%
21%
11%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
17%
16%
34%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
65%
13%
11%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 36%)
14%
31%
19%
36%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,500
  • Males1,485
  • Females1,515
  • Hispanic1,467
  • Asian1,580
  • Black1,450
  • White1,568
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,500
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 121
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

38%
23%
18%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,485, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 18%)
43%
25%
14%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 25%)
33%
21%
21%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 16%)
42%
21%
21%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,450, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 13%)
57%
23%
7%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 31%)
12%
28%
29%
31%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,775
  • Males3,656
  • Females3,893
  • Hispanic3,776
  • Asian3,879
  • Black3,622
  • White3,957
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,775
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 121
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

36%
19%
33%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,656, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 7%)
40%
23%
30%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,893, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 18%)
33%
13%
36%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,776, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 16%)
42%
16%
26%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,879, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
33%
17%
17%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,622, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 9%)
50%
20%
21%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,957, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 55%, Masters: 12%)
17%
16%
55%
12%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,613
  • Males1,606
  • Females1,622
  • Hispanic1,593
  • Black1,599
  • White1,638
  • Multirace1,657
Math Average Scale Score:

1,613
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 126
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

17%
37%
25%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 19%)
22%
35%
24%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 23%)
12%
39%
26%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
20%
50%
13%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 20%)
20%
38%
22%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 21%)
14%
24%
41%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,657, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,557
  • Males1,538
  • Females1,579
  • Hispanic1,551
  • Black1,537
  • White1,578
  • Multirace1,625
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,557
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 125
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

25%
32%
17%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 23%)
30%
31%
16%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 30%)
18%
34%
18%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 24%)
21%
34%
21%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
33%
31%
18%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
19%
31%
17%
33%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,625, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,703
  • Males3,678
  • Females3,734
  • Hispanic3,677
  • Black3,613
  • White3,793
  • Multirace3,867
Science Average Scale Score:

3,703
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 126
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

37%
38%
16%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,678, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 9%)
45%
27%
19%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,734, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 9%)
28%
51%
12%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,677, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
37%
43%
13%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,613, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 11%)
51%
31%
7%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,793, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 7%)
26%
43%
24%
7%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,867, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
33%
17%
33%
17%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Little Elm, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents