Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School in Allen, TX
(KG-04 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 99
Address
 256 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Allen, TX 75002
Telephone
(469) 742-8100
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.les.lovejoyisd.net
City-data.com school rating
99
Students
436
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
33.3
Free lunch eligible students
13
School district
LOVEJOY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WILLOW SPRINGS MIDDLE (0.5 miles):

100
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

99
SLOAN CREEK INT (0.1 miles):

97
JOE V HART EL (0.1 miles):

95
LOVEJOY H S (1.5 miles):

95
WALTER & LOIS CURTIS MIDDLE (2.5 miles):

95
CARLENA CHANDLER EL (1.9 miles):

94
DAVID AND LYNDA OLSON EL (2.6 miles):

94
ALVIS C STORY EL (2.3 miles):

87
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Collin County:

81
Allen:

88
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary:

99

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 436
Enrollment in 2015: 435
Enrollment in 2014: 438
Enrollment in 2013: 563
Enrollment in 2012: 565
Enrollment in 2011: 525
Enrollment in 2010: 528
Enrollment in 2009: 497
Enrollment in 2008: 791
Enrollment in 2007: 708
Enrollment in 2006: 725
Enrollment in 2005: 618
Enrollment in 2004: 540
Enrollment in 2003: 490
Enrollment in 2002: 423
Enrollment in 2001: 374
Enrollment in 2000: 707
Enrollment in 1999: 635

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04Total
All students368748896107436
Female students13636495458234
Male students23238394249202
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - 1 - 114
Asian students - 11048326
Hispanic students - 36871034
Black students - - 11136
White students26152697485343
Two or More Races students - 3465523

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 3
Kindergarten enrollment: 68
1st grade enrollment: 74
2nd grade enrollment: 88
3rd grade enrollment: 96
4th grade enrollment: 107

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 234 (53.7%)
Here:

53.7%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 202 (46.3%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

46.3%
Texas:

50.1%

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 4 (0.9%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

0.9%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 26 (6.0%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

6.0%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 34 (7.8%)
School:

7.8%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 6 (1.4%)
School:

1.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 343 (78.7%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

78.7%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 23 (5.3%)
School:

5.3%
Texas:

2.1%

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 13 (3.0%)
School:

3.0%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 13 (3.0%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

3.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

0.0%
State:

6.2%

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 33.3

Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 1
Number of FTE social workers: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

13.1
Texas:

15.6

Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,095,193
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 29.5 (Salary Expenditures: $1,630,925)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 60 (Salary Expenditures: $280,104)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $184,164)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $86,751
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,516,349
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,909,946
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7.7 (Salary Expenditures: $142,135)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $280,104)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $184,164)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $85,974

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian7
  • White2
  • Multirace2
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • White: 38 (male: 22, female: 16)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White16
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 22 (male: 13, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,613 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

3.7%
Texas:

3.6%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian10
  • Black4
  • White52
  • Multirace7
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 77 (male: 34, female: 43)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 52 (male: 23, female: 29)
  • Two or More Races: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Carrie L Lovejoy Elementary School:

176.6
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,587
  • Females1,540
  • Hispanic1,520
  • Asian1,626
  • White1,561
Math Average Scale Score:

1,565
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 92
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

5%
17%
32%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 51%)
4%
10%
35%
51%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 40%)
7%
23%
30%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 30%)
10%
20%
40%
30%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,561, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 46%)
5%
18%
31%
46%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,577
  • Males1,577
  • Females1,576
  • Hispanic1,526
  • Asian1,633
  • White1,577
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,577
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 92
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 92

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (96%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 60%

2%
22%
16%
60%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 59%)
2%
22%
17%
59%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 60%)
2%
21%
17%
60%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 50%)
40%
10%
50%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 60%)
3%
20%
17%
60%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,722
  • Males1,737
  • Females1,711
  • Hispanic1,702
  • Asian1,766
  • White1,717
  • Multirace1,782
Math Average Scale Score:

1,722
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 112
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.9 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 73%

1%
12%
14%
73%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,737, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 82%)
2%
8%
8%
82%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,711, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 67%)
16%
17%
67%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 64%)
18%
18%
64%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,766, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 75%)
1%
11%
13%
75%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,782, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 75%)
25%
75%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,638
  • Males1,626
  • Females1,648
  • Hispanic1,644
  • Asian1,653
  • White1,637
  • Multirace1,642
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,638
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 112
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 53%

6%
15%
26%
53%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 49%)
10%
17%
24%
49%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 56%)
3%
14%
27%
56%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 73%)
9%
18%
73%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
17%
16%
17%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 51%)
6%
15%
28%
51%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
12%
38%
50%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,258
  • Males4,157
  • Females4,335
  • Hispanic4,275
  • Asian4,296
  • White4,231
  • Multirace4,356
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,258
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 113
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.9 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 44%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

11%
16%
44%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,157, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 24%)
14%
21%
41%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,335, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 33%)
8%
14%
45%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,275, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 36%)
9%
18%
37%
36%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,296, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,231, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 27%)
10%
18%
45%
27%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,356, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 63%, Masters: 25%)
12%
63%
25%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 23 (male: 14, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

52.8
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

4.6
State:

3.1


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Allen, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents